Scott Adams – The Era of Women…

[Darth SinParticipant 576]

The brilliant Dilbert creator made a very realistic post on the the situation of the American politics.

Link:- http://blog.dilbert.com/post/151737656851/the-era-of-women

Article:-

If the latest groping/kissing allegations against Trump hold up – and I assume they will, based on quantity if not credibility – it won’t matter what Wikileaks says about Clinton. She will win easily.

If Clinton wins, you’ll wonder if this invalidates the Master Persuader Hypothesis. The short answer is no, because the concept doesn’t account for unknowns of this magnitude. If a meteor had struck Trump a day before election day, it wouldn’t say much about his skill as a persuader. The Master Persuasion Hypothesis worked splendidly until the double-whammy of the Access Hollywood tape and the “octopus” meteor.

Trump could still win, but only if some new and unexpected meteor strikes Clinton. Here’s how I see it through the persuasion filter:

Facts and policies stopped mattering months ago. No one cares.

Wikileaks has no meteors to offer. The Wikileaks misdeeds involve people who are not Clinton, and they involve issues that are boring and a bit complicated. The public will not be much influenced by them.

The “octopus” line about Trump is engineered persuasion of the highest order. It makes the story deeply visual and extra-creepy. Godzilla, or someone similarly skilled, is probably behind that word. It’s too engineered for a civilian to concoct during an interview. That’s professional work. And it’s probably a golden stake through Trump’s political heart. (Well played.)

This is a good time to remind you that I endorse Gary Johnson because he only touches himself.

Anyway, getting to the point of this post, if Clinton wins, it will be because women voted for her in landslide proportions while men (on average) preferred Trump. And that means two things of historic importance.

We will elect the first woman to be President of the United States. That’s good for everyone.
and…

Everything that goes wrong with the country from this point forward is women’s fault.
I feel some relief about that. The next four years are likely to be some of the worst in our country’s history. The Republican establishment will make sure of that because a failed America is in their best interest in the short run. Four years from now they want to offer their chosen savior (Paul Ryan). Trump would have a good chance of bullying the Republican establishment as he has done so far. Clinton, not so much. She’ll be buried in scandals, both real and imagined.

Men had a good run. We invented almost everything, and that’s cool. But we also started all of the wars and committed most of the crimes. It’s a mixed record to be sure. Now it’s time for something different, apparently.

Hillary Clinton is all yours, ladies. She and her alleged rapist husband are your brand now. Wear them well.

—

Adams makes a good point. Politically, if Hillary wins, it will be the era of women (and their white knighting mangina slaves).

Therefore, everything wrong with the USA from 2017 onwards is solely their fault.

I pity my American brothers. You are stuck with the either a traditionalist (Trump) or a feminist (Hillary).

F~~~ it all and just GYOW I say.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22589]

Adams is playing both sides from the middle. That is not a good place to be in politics. The moment Trump looks stronger, he will support Trump. And should Hillary show strength, he will support her.

This is political monkey branching. I have no respect for such people because such tactics show a complete absence of the concepts of loyalty and honesty towards one’s beliefs.

If one do not believe any anything, then one believes in nothing and is loyal to no one.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Faust For Science wrote:

Adams is playing both sides from the middle. That is not a good place to be in politics. The moment Trump looks stronger, he will support Trump. And should Hillary show strength, he will support her.

This is political monkey branching. I have no respect for such people because such tactics show a complete absence of the concepts of loyalty and honesty towards one’s beliefs.

If one do not believe any anything, then one believes in nothing and is loyal to no one.

I see it just like sports: you pick a team/club/franchise and stick with it.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[HitmanParticipant]

Darth Sin wrote:

Godzilla,

you talking to me ?
hahahaha!!!
Now on a more serious note,
just because we ( might) have a woman president doesn’t make everything that happens her fault or the fault of women in general..
Obama is (half) black.
is everything wrong with the country the black man’s fault now ?
no.
i blame feminism.
cultural suicide brought on by decades of it.
……wait a minute..
it IS women’s fault.
you just can’t blame one , Hillary..
all western women are infected with the diseased political views that feminism encouraged.

[pabsawakeParticipant 1761]

Darth Sin wrote:

Men had a good run. We invented almost everything, and that’s cool. But we also started all of the wars and committed most of the crimes. It’s a mixed record to be sure. Now it’s time for something different, apparently.

What the f~~~ bro?

did you not catch Keymaster’s little bit of info about Queen ruler ship thought Europe 1400-1900 27 percent more wars.

"You can either love women or understand them, you can't do both". Truth over everything

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

That was a quote from the blog, and the blog included a lot of satire.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22589]

Nerevar wrote:

I see it just like sports: you pick a team/club/franchise and stick with it.

A sports team does not get to make choices that effect your life and the lives of those you know and care for.

[pabsawakeParticipant 1761]

if it was the Dilbert quote from the comment then I stand corrected and retract my previous reply. I thought the OP was speaking for himself.

when I clicked on his link I somehow got redirected.
saw it now. apologies gentlemen. and to the OP

"You can either love women or understand them, you can't do both". Truth over everything

[KeymasterKeymaster]

pabsawake wrote:

f it was the Dilbert quote from the comment then I stand corrected

Yeah it was a quote from the article, but no harm done!……

Darth Sin wrote:

Men had a good run. We invented almost everything, and that’s cool. But we also started all of the wars

pabsawake wrote:

did you not catch Keymaster’s little bit of info about Queen ruler ship thought Europe 1400-1900 27 percent more wars.

It’s true.

http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2016/01/european-queens-waged-more-wars-than-kings.html

http://mentalfloss.com/article/74643/europes-queens-were-more-likely-go-war-its-kings

Men invented diplomacy and peace treaties.
Women invented paternity fraud.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Hitman wrote:

Darth Sin wrote:

Godzilla,

you talking to me ?
hahahaha!!!
Now on a more serious note,
just because we ( might) have a woman president doesn’t make everything that happens her fault or the fault of women in general..
Obama is (half) black.
is everything wrong with the country the black man’s fault now ?
no.
i blame feminism.
cultural suicide brought on by decades of it.
……wait a minute..
it IS women’s fault.
you just can’t blame one , Hillary..
all western women are infected with the diseased political views that feminism encouraged.

Exactly, Hitman. This why I don’t mind Hillary winning when it means defeating someone like Trump. We’ve had nothing but men Presidents yet feminism has still done this to us. Does anyone really think a male President, whether Trump or someone else, is going to change that?

Plus on the bright side feminists have told us how great a female President would be and if Hillary sucks as much as many people think we won’t have to worry about another woman winning for a long time.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Everything that goes wrong with the country from this point forward is women’s fault.

Since when have women ever accepted responsibility for anything?

Best case they’ll blame men for not stopping them.

But we also started all of the wars

That is a straight up lie.

and committed most of the crimes.

For most of history husbands were tried and punished for the crimes of their wives. Wives were only ever punished for crimes against their husbands. So that’s another lie.

[The Missing ManSpectator 342]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Plus on the bright side feminists have told us how great a female President would be and if Hillary sucks as much as many people think we won’t have to worry about another woman winning for a long time.

But Hillary won’t suck, she will be the greatest president ever.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I heard an interview with him on Stefan Molyneux’s show and I think he’s being very ironic – he’s not supporting her but he acts like it as a deep joke. He said he’s doing so because he doesn’t want to commit suicide with two shots in the back of his head. I think he’s a Trump supporter, but don’t remember the interview exactly.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[AttonParticipant]

The era of women began at the start of human history. They have far more control over this world than they will ever admit.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Atton wrote:

The era of women began at the start of human history. They have far more control over this world than they will ever admit.

Correct, on the average who contribute less but gain more from society since the beginning of humanity?

Who suffer more and contribute more but gain less from society?

Maybe at the start of civilization men is treated more fairly because society needs men to brave the harsh environment, as civilization prosper, men are given less and less while women gain more and more.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[AttonParticipant]

Gnostic wrote:

Atton wrote:

The era of women began at the start of human history. They have far more control over this world than they will ever admit.

Correct, on the average who contribute less but gain more from society since the beginning of humanity?

Who suffer more and contribute more but gain less from society?

Maybe at the start of civilization men is treated more fairly because society needs men to brave the harsh environment, as civilization prosper, men are given less and less while women gain more and more.

All while men suck them off and call the nearest woman maser, f~~~ that s~~~.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3726]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Plus on the bright side feminists have told us how great a female President would be and if Hillary sucks as much as many people think we won’t have to worry about another woman winning for a long time.

I presented a similar idea in an earlier thread. Didn’t go over so well, probably due to my word choice in the headline 🙂

The gist of my argument was that due to the extreme overleveraging of the global economy (200 TRILLION PLUS. That’s TRILLION with a capital “T”), some ki9nd of massive deleveraging must be coming down the pipeline, one way or the other, and it smells suspiciously like the next 4-8 years could be the time frame.

Therefore, due to the extreme pinheadedness of the ‘mmurican people, whomever is the sitting president when the heavily microwaved hot potato explodes will get all the blame, even though their choices/policies will have little if any actual responsibility for the “clustercrash” that will ensue.

The people, or enough of them, are obviously too stupid to see the difference between complicity in weapons sales to the planet’s worst human rights abusers, and a guy who while admittedly being a “crude masher,” has basically never really hurt anyone, at least at nowhere near on the scale of a Saudi Arabia or a Qatar.

Therefore, better to have Hillary get the blame and let responsible Conservative/Libertarian types pick up the pieces later. Hopefully we’ll be smart enough to drop the retarded abortion s~~~ like a hot potato by then. Ya ya I know the poor poor little baby-clumps.

Since women have been artificially terminating pregnancies for thousands of years and will continue to do so forever, the only question is whether or not to let the idea be used to make “useful idiots” out of religitards.

Don’t let them.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[GeraldParticipant 3648]

To a point I took from the write up… Did electing Obama stop people from blaming whites about race issues? I think it made it worse, personally, but it did stop some of the “I can’t get ahead because I am black” comments I used to hear.

Now, with a woman (man I wish it was the right woman) in the White House, will women stop blaming men or the patriarchy? Hell no. They will still say men are oppressing them, men this, men that. It just might get slightly quieter with the “I can’t get ahead” comments.

All in all, you get what you asked for, so remember to hold those who elect whichever candidate wins, responsible for electing them. Personally, no matter which one wins, or even if one of the third party candidates wins, I see dark times ahead for us in the US. I am not a conspiracy theorist, nor an end times kind of guy, but even I am doing some prepping, though minimal.

No longer can we walk away, we must run. Remove the motive power.

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Faust For Science wrote:

Nerevar wrote:

I see it just like sports: you pick a team/club/franchise and stick with it.

A sports team does not get to make choices that effect your life and the lives of those you know and care for.

True. Maybe a wrong example.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Therefore, better to have Hillary get the blame and let responsible Conservative/Libertarian types pick up the pieces later.

The problem is the “responsible conservative / libertarian types”…

…aren’t.

The republicans have no more interest in solving problems, ending corruption, or getting a handle on our spiraling down the bowl economy than the democrats. They just want to be the ones who get to sign the checks. Look at how they kept raising the debt ceiling over and over and over.

That’s why they are sooo upset over Trump’s nomination. He might actually fix s~~~, and then nobody will get to sign big checks.

[Author]

Posts