Maybe we SHOULD vote for Hillary

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Ok, I know I KNOW. Just hear me out.

I was reading Clusterf~~~ Nation today, and Kunstler pretty much perfectly summed up my feeling about this election:

Vote for Trump? Not if you chained me to the back bumper of a Toyota Landcruiser and dragged me over six miles of broken light bulbs. Hillary? Make that nine miles, and throw down some carpet tacks.

Now here’s where it gets interesting; He raised one very VERY interesting and salient point:

But wait a minute…! Here’s something to consider: a proposition put out by David McAlvany on his podcast last week: To Understand Election 2016 You Have to See 2020. The idea is that the winner of the presidential election is sure to be the biggest loser because the global economy is in the process of tanking, Long Emergency style, and the global finance system is going down with it. Whoever presides over this fiasco from the White House is going to be a bigger bag-holder than old Herbert Hoover in 1929.

If it’s true that the whole s~~~ sandwich cart is about to fly off its wheels, maybe having (s)H(r)illary in the hotseat will serve as a dire warning for future generation who rush to elect someone purely based on the novelty of gender.

Thoughts?

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Click bait.

Your subject sucks.

No.

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

No

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

“the global economy is in the process of tanking,”

Nonsense.

[narwhalParticipant]

No.

Personally, I think whoever gets elected will be impeached within a year. Both candidates have significant enemies, shading records, and are really likely to do something stupid rather quickly.

Ok. Then do it.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Imagine if Hillary “wins”, gets impeached and then we’re stuck with Tim Kane clown? Oh boy
“right hand person” my ass

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[DoinMyOwnThing40Participant 1000]

LOL, no way. I am not willing to see this country go further and further down the toilet. I heard people back when Obama was running that we should vote for him because then it would wake America up and then no one will vote democrat again. Yeah right, that was wishful thinking. It’s silly nonsense thinking.

Women are parasites. Each and every last one of them.

[TuneoutParticipant]

DoinMyOwnThing40 wrote:

LOL, no way. I am not willing to see this country go further and further down the toilet. I heard people back when Obama was running that we should vote for him because then it would wake America up and then no one will vote democrat again. Yeah right, that was wishful thinking. It’s silly nonsense thinking.

Actually a lot of people thought he’d be better just because he’s Black – the same idiots who think Hillary will be great because she’s female.

This kind of reasoning is scary

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[Anonymous 42]

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9549]

I would never vote for that nasty bitch! I don’t want the next 4 – 8 years being hollered at every time she talks. And I don’t want to hear about rights and equality for women in every one of her speeches, when women have it better than men.

HILLARY FOR FIREING SQUAD 2016!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOCK HER UP!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Anonymous 42]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

I don’t want the next 4 – 8 years being hollered at every time she talks.

R-Evil doesn’t like “Hollery” Clinton!

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

“the global economy is in the process of tanking,”

Nonsense.

Not Nonsense.

152 TRILLION dollars in debt, 225% of global GDP just to service it, how does that not bode financial catastrophe at some point? Especially when it(debt increase) show no signs of slowing down…..

I’m open to possibilities, but first you’ll have to explain how the 152 trillion gets paid back with ever diminishing resources….

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

152 TRILLION dollars in debt, 225% of global GDP just to service it, how does that not bode financial catastrophe at some point? Especially when it(debt increase) show no signs of slowing down…..
I’m open to possibilities, but first you’ll have to explain how the 152 trillion gets paid back with ever diminishing resources….

I agree we are f~~~ed. Who would you rather have to pick up the pieces?

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

“the global economy is in the process of tanking,”

Nonsense.

Not Nonsense.

152 TRILLION dollars in debt, 225% of global GDP just to service it, how does that not bode financial catastrophe at some point? Especially when it(debt increase) show no signs of slowing down…..

I’m open to possibilities, but first you’ll have to explain how the 152 trillion gets paid back with ever diminishing resources….

Closing of IMF, nationalization of central banks and global write-off would do that

I’m not sure where, but it’s either in the Bible or in Torah, it says that every seven years debts need to be forgiven. Is that so?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Chaff/FlareParticipant 3235]

Russky wrote:

but it’s either in the Bible or in Torah, it says that every seven years debts need to be forgiven. Is that so?

Jubilee. Old Testament/Torah

When you find yourself in the majority, it's time to reflect.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

And I don’t want to hear about rights and equality for women in every one of her speeches, when women have it better than men.

You may have a point, but I’m thinking long term. The Federal c̶o̶u̶n̶t̶e̶r̶f̶e̶i̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶o̶p̶e̶r̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ Reserve Bank™ is rapidly running out of options before our currency hyperinflates out of existence.

Notice how they “conveniently” leave out food, fuel, and housing inflation from their “official” inflation numbers supposed because they’re “volatile,” but even more conveniently *include* wages in their figures. Because gods forbid the American worker should start to ever get ahead a little – f~~~ NO! We gotta stop that s~~~ cold.

As if people’s wages aren’t “volatile.”

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Russky wrote:

Closing of IMF, nationalization of central banks and global write-off would do that

Hey I’m with you on that one Russky. The power of the creation of new money should only rest with the people’s duly elected officials, and then only with great difficulty.

One possible problem though – apparently a big chunk of that debt is private. Should we just cancel that too? IT sounds great I know, but then you’re giving a huge free ride and windfall to the Kartrashian types that ran up their credit cards like there’s no tomorrow, and a big “F~~~ YOU” to people like you and I who are probably a lot more responsible and don’t have huge debt.

I like the theory, just not sure about the sticking the dismount.

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

DoinMyOwnThing40 wrote:

LOL, no way. I am not willing to see this country go further and further down the toilet. I heard people back when Obama was running that we should vote for him because then it would wake America up and then no one will vote democrat again. Yeah right, that was wishful thinking. It’s silly nonsense thinking.

He woke America up to the fact that a Democratic President is better than a Republican. One of the highest approval ratings of an outgoing President in history.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

“the global economy is in the process of tanking,”

Nonsense.

Not Nonsense.

152 TRILLION dollars in debt, 225% of global GDP just to service it, how does that not bode financial catastrophe at some point? Especially when it(debt increase) show no signs of slowing down…..

I’m open to possibilities, but first you’ll have to explain how the 152 trillion gets paid back with ever diminishing resources….

No, not if you understand fiat money isn’t real. It’s literally just a game, one that strong countries like ourselves are taking advantage of to deficit spend.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Chaff/Flare wrote:

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

152 TRILLION dollars in debt, 225% of global GDP just to service it, how does that not bode financial catastrophe at some point? Especially when it(debt increase) show no signs of slowing down…..
I’m open to possibilities, but first you’ll have to explain how the 152 trillion gets paid back with ever diminishing resources….

I agree we are f~~~ed. Who would you rather have to pick up the pieces?

Let’s have a guy who hasn’t picked up a book in his adult life fix it. One who was born with $200 million silver spoon in his mouth and still found a way to lose it. Yeah, that’ll work…

[Author]

Posts