Question to the monks

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

[AutoliteParticipant]

DanceMyOwnWay wrote:

What’s it like and do you miss the sex.

No.

It’s like an association. I’ve been in enough bad relationshhits to know that the sex is nowhere near worth the misery endured. Imagine that you give a dog a thick steak. And each time the dog takes a bite of that steak, you bash it in the head with a baseball bat. Now do this repeatedly each time you give the dog a steak. Soon, the dog is going to associate eating steak with getting it’s head bashed in. It won’t be long before the dog no longer desires any steak…

[AutoliteParticipant]

Remember also that any physical contact with a woman is now a potential rape/sexual assault charge sitting over your head for the next forty years. I have a very low tolerance for liability. And that liability alone is enough for me. That kinda thing makes it easy for me to stay monk…

[EGParticipant 1852]

Autolite wrote:

DanceMyOwnWay wrote:

What’s it like and do you miss the sex.

I always laugh whenever I hear “sex” with the word “the” in front of it. We should use that phrasing more often. Instead of just calling it “sex”, we should call it “the sex” to put a whole new spin on it. Particularly when you want to put a negative spin on it, such as, “Last night Pumpkin and I had the sex.” Or, “Things were fine in my life until I got seduced by that bitch and we had the sex. Now my life is fnuked.” When used in this way it can be a powerful tool to view the sex from a different angle, and possibly make better choices therein.

I had the sex with one woman, one time. That was enough.

Autolite wrote:

Remember also that any physical contact with a woman is now a potential rape/sexual assault charge sitting over your head for the next forty years. I have a very low tolerance for liability. And that liability alone is enough for me. That kinda thing makes it easy for me to stay monk…

When people ask questions, how do you answer without earning yourself a label such as antisocial, or paranoid? If you’re surrounded by blue-pilled people, they notice when you disappear. Some of them might even demand answers. And they may purposefully misunderstand those answers in order to label you. What then?

[AutoliteParticipant]

EG wrote:

When people ask questions, how do you answer without earning yourself a label such as antisocial, or paranoid? If you’re surrounded by blue-pilled people, they notice when you disappear. Some of them might even demand answers. And they may purposefully misunderstand those answers in order to label you. What then?

I’ve never been asked why I avoid women/relationshhits. But I’ve found that most people are in general feeble minded simpletons and will think the worst about you anyway regardless of any explanation that you can give them. There isn’t really anything that you can do about that. Often they’ll just assume that you’re gay.

But if I were asked I would tell them that I am a ‘loner’ and I am far more comfortable to just be by myself. It’s the truth and they need not understand the why of it but hopefully they can acknowledge and accept that that’s just the way some people are…

[CPT ObviousParticipant 2729]

Autolite wrote:

And each time the dog takes a bite of that steak, you bash it in the head with a baseball bat.

And if you are married long enough, the analogy can go one step further:

Hold the steak up in front of the dog repeatedly, but don’t let him eat it. Then bash him the head anyway.

Then give the steak to a stray dog in the neighborhood.

"You don't know a woman till you have met her in divorce court."

[Anonymous 3]

Autolite wrote:

EG wrote:

When people ask questions, how do you answer without earning yourself a label such as antisocial, or paranoid? If you’re surrounded by blue-pilled people, they notice when you disappear. Some of them might even demand answers. And they may purposefully misunderstand those answers in order to label you. What then?

I’ve never been asked why I avoid women/relationshhits. But I’ve found that most people are in general feeble minded simpletons and will think the worst about you anyway regardless of any explanation that you can give them. There isn’t really anything that you can do about that. Often they’ll just assume that you’re gay.

It is not bad enough to live our lives according to the opinions of others, and we have also to consider what they may be thinking?

The good news is that, contrary to our belief, WE ARE NOT THE CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE! People only think of us for a few seconds, if at all.

And we are conditioning our life, our happiness, our choices, for this??? For the measly seconds that they consider our existence?

Let us be pragmatic. We live in society and we interact with people, we need people for goods and services if we are to antagonize people we are creating hardships for ourselves.

For what? What can a man gain for antagonizing others? So that they know your ideas, to validate them? They wont! They only validate THEIR OWN IDEAS.

So, if your ideas, choices and lifestyle do not sit well with others, BE QUIET ABOUT IT! Nobody needs to, or has the right to know anything about you.

Keep it to yourself. Present yourself publicly as an ordinary citizen, a gray man, with nothing remarkable. Nobody will think of you.

But we don’t like to do this. We must shout out loud our opinions, so that others may see how great they are… Unfortunately there is a saying:

“Opinions are like farts, only ours don’t smell, everybody else’s smells bad”.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

EG wrote:

iMickey503 wrote:

I don’t really want a women. I know it would be fun. But I’m just no longer really interested anymore.

Didn’t one of them get you locked up over bullsh!t? Yeah, I can see why you’re no longer really interested anymore.

Well that and your so attractive E.G.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22515]

Autolite wrote:

Remember also that any physical contact with a woman is now a potential rape/sexual assault charge sitting over your head for the next forty years. I have a very low tolerance for liability. And that liability alone is enough for me. That kinda thing makes it easy for me to stay monk…

Doesnt matter if you touch them or not, or even if you ever met. Lying heresay of women can destroy you thanks to the gynocracy white knights.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Autolite wrote:

Remember also that any physical contact with a woman is now a potential rape/sexual assault charge sitting over your head for the next forty years. I have a very low tolerance for liability. And that liability alone is enough for me. That kinda thing makes it easy for me to stay monk…

Doesnt matter if you touch them or not, or even if you ever met. Lying heresay of women can destroy you thanks to the gynocracy white knights.

Yes this is true. The point being is that I try to reduce the liability as much as possible. Zero interaction I would like to think helps. ‘No contact’ means that the woman would have to fabricate and sustain a blatant lie from nothing. She may even have to beat a lie detector. The more profound the lie, the harder it is to maintain…

[AutoliteParticipant]

Deleted…

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22515]

Autolite wrote:

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Autolite wrote:

Remember also that any physical contact with a woman is now a potential rape/sexual assault charge sitting over your head for the next forty years. I have a very low tolerance for liability. And that liability alone is enough for me. That kinda thing makes it easy for me to stay monk…

Doesnt matter if you touch them or not, or even if you ever met. Lying heresay of women can destroy you thanks to the gynocracy white knights.

Yes this is true. The point being is that I try to reduce the liability as much as possible. Zero interaction I would like to think helps. ‘No contact’ means that the woman would have to fabricate and sustain a blatant lie from nothing. She may even have to beat a lie detector. The more profound the lie, the harder it is to maintain…

Oh I totally agree with you about reducing risk and zero contact. I am saying it may not be enough. Men have been screwed over even with positive evidence the woman is lying. The authorities can just refuse to look at it. Guys can get screwed if a judge or da wants to make an example out of some guy even if the guy is innocent, just to appear to support the gynocracy’s feminist laws.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[WallyParticipant]

Been Monk for over a decade, as time goes by I don’t miss it and when it’s offered I can stop and do a cost benefit analysis, it’s never worth it. I have actually found it easier to interact with them personally and professionally and there are several women I consider friends. At times I have to stop and really think to myself “I can pretty much do what I want, when I want.” My job is flexible and I enjoy what I do. I have plenty of money saved from not being in a relationship to spend on my hobbies. As far as companionship, everytime I take my dog to the dog park and I see my him running to me with his tail wagging- well it doesn’t get any better than that.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[WallyParticipant]

CPT Obvious wrote:

Autolite wrote:

And each time the dog takes a bite of that steak, you bash it in the head with a baseball bat.

And if you are married long enough, the analogy can go one step further:
Hold the steak up in front of the dog repeatedly, but don’t let him eat it. Then bash him the head anyway.
Then give the steak to a stray dog in the neighborhood.

Probably the best analogy with regards to marriage I have read, well put sir.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[MonkParticipant 16988]

EG wrote:

Instead of just calling it “sex”, we should call it “the sex” to put a whole new spin on it. Particularly when you want to put a negative spin on it, such as, “Last night Pumpkin and I had the sex.” […] When used in this way it can be a powerful tool to view the sex from a different angle, and possibly make better choices therein.

Clever. It shows how little it takes to see something in an entirely different – and more realistic – light.

[MonkParticipant 16988]

Anonymous wrote:

Let us be pragmatic. We live in society and we interact with people, we need people for goods and services if we are to antagonize people we are creating hardships for ourselves.

For what? What can a man gain for antagonizing others? So that they know your ideas, to validate them? They wont! They only validate THEIR OWN IDEAS.

So, if your ideas, choices and lifestyle do not sit well with others, BE QUIET ABOUT IT! Nobody needs to, or has the right to know anything about you.

Keep it to yourself. Present yourself publicly as an ordinary citizen, a gray man, with nothing remarkable. Nobody will think of you.

Ghosting 101. Why you should ghost in a nutshell.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Secret Agent MGTOW wrote:

Oh I totally agree with you about reducing risk and zero contact. I am saying it may not be enough. Men have been screwed over even with positive evidence the woman is lying. The authorities can just refuse to look at it. Guys can get screwed if a judge or da wants to make an example out of some guy even if the guy is innocent, just to appear to support the gynocracy’s feminist laws.

Well it’s like I’ve said, I want to reduce the liability as much as possible. Our dysfunctional, corrupt anti-male biased legal system is something that I can do nothing about. I understand that. ‘No contact’, ‘no interaction’ will reduce the risk. It does not eliminate the risk. I never claimed that it does…

[DanceMyOwnWayParticipant 2096]

Wally wrote:

Been Monk for over a decade, as time goes by I don’t miss it and when it’s offered I can stop and do a cost benefit analysis, it’s never worth it. I have actually found it easier to interact with them personally and professionally and there are several women I consider friends. At times I have to stop and really think to myself “I can pretty much do what I want, when I want.” My job is flexible and I enjoy what I do. I have plenty of money saved from not being in a relationship to spend on my hobbies. As far as companionship, everytime I take my dog to the dog park and I see my him running to me with his tail wagging- well it doesn’t get any better than that.

This is the kind of view that works for me.
Women always ask me, “where is this going, am I no. One etc.”

I’m number one. Be a positive addition to my life or not.
I’m not here to be your safety blanket woman.

As long as life is interesting, less stress and drama and greater peacefulness seems appealing. I’m sure it MUST be so for most men.

If you fall down 7 times, get up 8

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

Do I miss sex? Oh yeah…..very much so…..
Do I miss the EXPENSE of dating or having a girlfriend or a wife? HELL NO!
Do I love having my entire home and garage as my Man Cave? HELL YEAH!

Yesterday….I was having lunch in a bar….taking a break from an all day motorcycle ride…next to me was a young millennial couple…the woman simply would never shut up…and kept trying to exert even the slightest amount of control over her boyfriend…who was pretty clear…he just wanted a little peace and quiet to give his ears a break…

And it was very clear that they weren’t married and she was definitely trying to work him into eventually getting into that sort of an arrangement.

Do I miss any of that? Nope!

I just miss the Sex…as for Companionship …. touch is nice as are PDA’s but women’s companionship is worthless…and their opinions on things are absolute trash.
I’d rather listen and converse with other guys….I find women to be both emotionally and financially draining….and when I am around women for any extended period of time…I start to desperately look for a quiet place I can escape to…

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Sex with women might be fun were it not for the high costs associated with it.

It’s not just the money. You will sacrifice time and peace of mind. Since most women feel it’s a man’s job to keep them happy, some men spend a lot of precious time in order to keep snowflake happy. I personally would rather play golf or walk on the beach. And the drama- most women I know live in a perpetual state of drama and they love to drag men into their world of crazy.

Of course the money enters into the equation.
Women will tell any lie to separate you from your assets.

I could be wrong, but the decision to go monk seems to be a very good choice

[Author]

Posts