New Orleans restaurant Charging White People More for Food

[It’sallbsParticipant]

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03-14-new-orleans-restaurant-announces-white-privilege-tax.html

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

It’s just my white privilege being taxed. F~~~ them. I will never again set foot in the state of Louisiana. It’s over rated anyway.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Oh I am going to make sure this hits the local news.

With a little controversy this place will close.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

It’s legal because it’s voluntary.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Sky-OParticipant 18948]

Some people are already charged more for food.

Everyday.

If you use a working person as an example. They work and might be in a 32% combined tax bracket (payroll) which leaves them with $68 out of every $100 they make. Then pay sales tax in their state on purchases 8% bring the total tax to 40%.

So in order to walk out of a grocery store with $60 worth of food, they needed to start with $100.

VS.

Someone with an EBT card. $100 via an EBT card is not taxed down to $68 and sales tax is not charged on purchases made with an EBT card. (The state doesn’t not collect tax from itself)

So at that point, a person with an EBT card is essentially paying less for food than someone that has to work to buy food. (And factoring in not having to expend life energy through work to buy food as well)

[MarketWatcherParticipant]

Very good point Sky O.

[Sky-OParticipant 18948]

MarketWatcher wrote:

Very good point Sky O.

The same math applies to housing too.

There are plenty of working people that pay $900-1,200 month for an apartment and are broke after the 1st of every month.

People on Section8 are broke every month too: But still have an apartment but do not have to expend any life energy in order to have a place to live.

It’s a shell game. Structured to keep both working people and those that do not work at the same socio economic level. Perpetually.

[narwhalParticipant]

But that isn’t racism, Sky-O. That’s welfare and what I’d call unfair taxation. (The idea that a person who earns more should pay more for the less government services never made any sense to me)

Ok. Then do it.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

743 roadmaster wrote:

Oh I am going to make sure this hits the local news.

Well I found it on the US news section of David Icke’s website.

https://www.davidicke.com/category/49347/us-news

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[DarkRyuParticipant 2354]

They have to make up for the third world trash stealing the food.

[Anonymous 42]

This government does the same thing with affirmative action, the white man is discriminated against in much the same way no matter how low he is on the pay scale. You know, Equality, equal pay, and all that other discriminatory legislation delivered on the wings of “feels”…

[GregB0Participant]

MarketWatcher wrote:

t’s just my white privilege being taxed. F

They have to find new ways of getting money as quickly as possible as State Governments are increasing the deficit by giving it away to those “in need” faster each and every day. It is their opportunity to right an injustice.

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Sky-O wrote:

Some people are already charged more for food.

Everyday.

If you use a working person as an example. They work and might be in a 32% combined tax bracket (payroll) which leaves them with $68 out of every $100 they make. Then pay sales tax in their state on purchases 8% bring the total tax to 40%.

So in order to walk out of a grocery store with $60 worth of food, they needed to start with $100.

VS.

Someone with an EBT card. $100 via an EBT card is not taxed down to $68 and sales tax is not charged on purchases made with an EBT card. (The state doesn’t not collect tax from itself)

So at that point, a person with an EBT card is essentially paying less for food than someone that has to work to buy food. (And factoring in not having to expend life energy through work to buy food as well)

paying more because you’re in a higher tax bracket and paying more because you’re white aren’t equivalent

[Sky-OParticipant 18948]

It’s like. . .

N_____ please.

[narwhalParticipant]

surfdude12 wrote:

paying more because you’re in a higher tax bracket and paying more because you’re white aren’t equivalent

Not the same, but it is similar. Both are saying one person should pay another for the same product(s) because it feels like you should pay more.

Ok. Then do it.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Until the white Americans say, “That’s enough, cut that s~~~!” they will be forever guilty and blamed for all sins their long-gone ancestors did. Even this Nigerian owner who isn’t connected with the history of slavery in the USA tries to shame and blame white Americans! 😀

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

narwhal wrote:

Not the same, but it is similar. Both are saying one person should pay another for the same product(s) because it feels like you should pay more.

Only one is saying one person must pay more = white people = you can’t change your race

The other is saying one income must pay more = you can change your income

I hate both, but to equate these on any level trivializes white bigotry.

[narwhalParticipant]

Suggestius wrote:

Until the white Americans say, “That’s enough, cut that s~~~!” they will be forever guilty and blamed for what they long gone ancestors did. Even this Nigerian owner who has nothing to do with the history of slavery in the USA tries to shame and blame white Americans!

Not true. There are plenty of white people who will say this. But that person will be quickly called a racist by a large percentage of his own race who see a virtue signally opportunity.

Seriously, there are many people here (probably everywhere) who say there is no such thing as racism against white people because racism is institutional. Therefore their comments against whites cannot be racist. But then again, they will claim racism at any comment against blacks is concerned racist, even though the person making the comment has no ties to any institutions whatsoever.

There is no point in fighting that sort of logic.

It ends when those who claim victim take out all their allies, or when enough of their own abandon their victimhood.

I have no doubt that this guy is only doing this because he has few white customers to begin with. Here in Texas, a Mexican guy would never tax white people, because white people are usually the bulk of his customers. They’d just go to the Mexican restaurant around the corner…he’d go out of business.

Ok. Then do it.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

Not true. There are plenty of white people who will say this. But that person will be quickly called a racist by a large percentage of his own race who see a virtue signally opportunity.

Correct in Britain even politicians have publicly branded all older leave voters as racist.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Anonymous 38]

It’s a free country. Just don’t go there to eat.

[Author]

Posts