Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › My ex-wife still loves me!
This topic contains 50 replies, has 35 voices, and was last updated by TaoTheMgtowWanderer 3 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Cunning creatures !! Careful bro, you’re getting set up. And yes when you say no……. she’s gonna go ballistic
Peace is > piece.
They ALWAYS miss what they lost, and in some cases purposely threw away!!
It doesn’t matter the reasons or the excuses, but she lost the human being that has done the most for her, and probably much more then any other human EVER will do for her sorry ass EVER again !! Reality is setting in, and NOW she wants HER life back with you front and center. Unfortunately, her little blue pill man servant has taken a red pill or two and has been awakened to the true female nature of his lil sweetie, and he has left the plantation !!!
Honey, you better open up a Match.com account, and TRY starting over !!!
In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash
eric,my ex said what a great dad i am,
that she “still loves” me
and was hinting about getting back together.
i let her know that we do not make a good couple,
and that i love her too,
i’m just not “in love ” anymore…
.
i tell her what she wants to hear….to a point.
then the line must be drawn.
nicely.
but very seriously, so there is no mistake.
NEVER go back with ANY ex.You guys want Mrs. Sloppy?
Sloppy seconds??? eeewwwwh…Hahaha!!!
thanks but no thanks brother!
i can’t finish the divorce with my own Mrs.Sloppy!
she really lived in a pile of crap.
zero organisation skills.
so glad she left.
now my home is clean and the way I want it.
.
one chance per woman per lifetime.They ALWAYS miss what they lost, and in some cases purposely threw away!!
It doesn’t matter the reasons or the excuses, but she lost the human being that has done the most for her, and probably much more then any other human EVER will do for her sorry ass EVER again !! Reality is setting in, and NOW she wants HER life back with you front and center. Unfortunately, her little blue pill man servant has taken a red pill or two and has been awakened to the true female nature of his lil sweetie, and he has left the plantation !!!
Honey, you better open up a Match.com account, and TRY starting over !!!
I always have been aware that separation and divorce are a slaughter for men, even when I was going to marry. I just thought that it wasn’t going to happen to me. And since I haven’t been hurted so much as the average man by the divorce, that wasn’t my red pill.
I always have been aware that women are more interested about money than men, even when I was going to marry.My red pill process has been very different:
My lawyer telling me that AT LEAST 70% stalking accusations after a separation are false, and it’s more likely to be 80%.
My country signing Istanbul Convention saying that domestic violence is just only male-on-female and discrimination against men is allowed in order to prevent it.
My lawyer telling me that alimonies for cohabitation were coming, and to never live with a woman “because we’re all whores”.
My country passing alimonies for cohabitation.That’s why I could care less if AWALT or NAWALT: it doesn’t matter, nor even in the slighest.
ALAG: All Laws Are Gynocentric.
That’s the point.
It’s WAY WAY WAY more than the unfair divorce laws: unfair divorce laws can be explained with the importance of motherhood, the best interests of the children, etc.
Saying OFFICIALLY that male violence against women does matter and the opposite doesn’t matter, saying OFFICIALLY that a woman without children deserve alimonies after a cohabitation: those are very different things.
The rabbit hole proved, through REAL laws, to be way deeper than I thought.
And it’s all on paper, it’s law.Then ALAG means that even an eventual true unicorn would still have all the power over me.
It doesn’t matter if she’s not going to use it because she’s a true unicorn.
She can do it.
Legally.
And laws will keep change, and every time laws will change the new version will be more gynocentric than the previous.
That’s enough for me.
I’ll never give to a woman legal rights over me nor even the chance to benefit from future legal rights over me that aren’t already law.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Alimony for cohabitation.
Good luck with that. Then females wont be able to spend the night. Pump her and kick her out.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Sounds like a nuclear weapon.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
And laws will keep change, and every time laws will change the new version will be more gynocentric than the previous.
That’s enough for me.
I’ll never give to a woman legal rights over me nor even the chance to benefit from future legal rights over me that aren’t already law.And this is what I learned here, from you.
This and the “STD rise” in recent years is what “finished off” my wants to ever deal with any woman again.
I escaped a false accuastion trapping t~~~ once in 2002, maybe she was afraid of my “silent retaliation” but she did it on the gay brother of her boss. Like getting shot at, the bullet avoiding your head by millimeters and then never running into gunfire again. I have the problem that I have some wealth and assets, and that makes me an easy target. Women don’t do s~~~ like that with chads that don’t have any money these gold-diggers could grab.
In July of 2018, this honey pot forum was sold out to an unidentified NPC sock puppet and troll organization. Most independent thinkers and writers migrated to other MGTOW forums as a result of the never-ending infighting and deliberate trouble starting caused by members who were given "carte blanche" by the admin to do whatever they want. Before my departure, I only left a few thousand cat pics here to comfort and ridicule the feminist owners who now run this place. Their background agenda is to make MGTOW look like a club of losers the public eye. And during the course of 2019, they actually managed to destroy almost all other MGTOW venues as well. Here is the truth about "theindependentman.org" aka "TIM" which was created as an extended workbench to further divide the community. When you register, they install a spyware Zombie cookie on your browser that does all kinds of things the user does not know of: http://www.filedropper.com/essay-on-the-removal-of-malware-cookies-used-by-tim
How much did she take you for in the divorce? Next time she says she still loves you, tell her:
“It warms my heart to hear that. So you’re giving me everything back right? That’s what people do for the ones they love “.
Alimony for cohabitation.
Good luck with that. Then females wont be able to spend the night. Pump her and kick her out.
The law in its actual form applies just only when the weaker part is unable to have a decent living after the cohabitation ends, and it applies for a limited time, proportionated to how much the cohabitation lasted.
In example: if she earns 2K and he earns 3K (monthly, after taxation), she get nothing.
If she have zero income and he earns 3K and the cohabitation lasted 3 years then he’ll give her about 1K for just only 3 years.The problem is that even Canada have a very moderated law about cohabitation until 2013. In 2013 they changed it basically making cohabitation and marriage almost the same thing.
More and more women will be lawmakers and judges in future.
Their biology suggest them that men owe s~~~ to women, especially support, for sleeping with women.
Our female ancestors were less likely to survive in the jungle without such instinct, that’s why women have such instinct, it’s not that they’re bad: they don’t even know that they have such instinct, and they have a myriad of ways to rationalize the practical outcomes of such instinct: it may be “the good of the children”, it may be “the protection of the weaker part”, and so on.
Still, it’s just an instinct, and their “rationalizations” are pure s~~~: when the case is reverted, and the weaker part is the man, those “rationalizations” suddenly change. A man isn’t judged “weak” due his actual income, it’s judge “weak” regarding his “potential” of earning an income.
It means that if you’re a man who earned 3K but you’re now jobless, they aren’t going to say that she have to give you money. Because you have the “potential”, you know…you can eat your “potential”: a man can survive even without eating, he can eat his “potential”, according those females.I’m not taking such s~~~.
Even a cartoon is more wise than judges when the weaker part is the man:Tigress: It is said that the Dragon Warrior can survive for months at a time on nothing but the dew of a single ginko leaf and the energy of the universe.
Po: I guess my body doesn’t know I’m the Dragon Warrior yet. Gonna take a lot more than dew, and universe… juice.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
How much did she take you for in the divorce? Next time she says she still loves you, tell her:
“It warms my heart to hear that. So you’re giving me everything back right? That’s what people do for the ones they love “.
The family house, that was paid 80% by me, and was by far the best house we owned as family.
She get money for the children.
No alimonies for her: she’s a college professor and also she get a rent from another house.
She did not even tried for alimonies, even though I earn more than her. She did know she wasn’t going to get it from me. Ever. I would had left the job rather than giving her alimonies, and she knew.
The only trick she tried was insisting about her need of a new car during the last months: she hoped that I was going to buy her a SUV as a mean to keep her happy and solve the crisis.
She thought I was going to buy her a Volvo XC60 with my savings, “in order to save the marriage”: she even gave a down payment, it was a full optionals version, used zero miles.
She lost the down payment, not a big loss for her, it was just only 1,000 euro. Probably during this last black friday she have just spent more than 1,000 euro.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Eric-
This sounds like a stressful situation.
On one hand, when kids are involved, we sometimes will try to make things work even when we know better.
On the other hand, why will she treat you better than she did before? I say forget what she wants. What do you want?
Good luck
How much did she take you for in the divorce? Next time she says she still loves you, tell her:
“It warms my heart to hear that. So you’re giving me everything back right? That’s what people do for the ones they love “.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This to this this ^^^^ No, really. Seriously.
They ALWAYS miss what they lost,
Honey, you better open up a Match.com account, and TRY starting over !!!
Hahaha stupid women always on the social media match.com. I met some very sick women on there. No way ever again hahaha
I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d
It has to be said …
.
.
Careful, it’s a trap!#ManOut
Eric-
This sounds like a stressful situation.
On one hand, when kids are involved, we sometimes will try to make things work even when we know better.
On the other hand, why will she treat you better than she did before? I say forget what she wants. What do you want?
Good luck
The good of the children is unrelated to my return: it isn’t the amount of time that I spend with them that matters, but the quality of time that I spend with them that matters.
I have my son with me very often: it’s 4-5 days per week, two-three hours for each of those 4-5 days. My daughter: 1 day each week, and also I see her for ten minutes every day when I carry my son at his mother’s house.Plus more two full week-ends with both, each month.
The amount of time I spend with my son is very close to when I was at home, and the quality is far superior.
With the daughter the situation is more mixed: way less time than before I leaved her mother but also superior quality, then ther’s the fact that daughters need fathers way less than sons.I gave up to a woman treating me better, being more beautiful and actually having the plus of involving me in threesomes since she’s bisexual.
I gave up because I didn’t wish to live with her and by so giving her legal rights over me.
She would had earn, through cohabitation, way less legal rights then the rights my ex wife would earn from a reconciliation.
My ex wife is doing it because now she have a 22,700 euro debt and she failed to hook a rich and older man, while there were some chances that the other woman was being sincere.I’m not going to take such bad deal.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I just have one question – how hard did you laugh when she said this?
ONE CHANCE
PER CHICK
PER LIFETIME.
NO EXCEPTIONS.
She had her chance.
Here’s all you really need to say when you see her.
Ironically, a lifeless machine monster seems to know the proper way to deal with most of today’s problems concerning women.
Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.
said that she still love me,
If she had loved you, she wouldn’t have left you in the first place..!! Never ever ever trust women by their words, see their actions to know the true nature of them.
My advice.. RUN !!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678