MGTOW now has a wikipedia page. is that new?

Topic by Puffin Stuff

Puffin Stuff

Home Forums MGTOW Central MGTOW now has a wikipedia page. is that new?

Tagged: 

This topic contains 46 replies, has 32 voices, and was last updated by Himeo  Himeo 4 years ago.

Viewing 7 posts - 41 through 47 (of 47 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #168980
    +3
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    The lying & staging the news is not the main concern.
    It’s replacing a legit WIKI entry for MGTOW with f~~~ing untrue crap and then trying to strike it.

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
    #169016
    +1
    The_Mad_Pirate
    The_Mad_Pirate
    Participant
    1278

    The lying & staging the news is not the main concern.
    It’s replacing a legit WIKI entry for MGTOW with f~~~ing untrue crap and then trying to strike it.

    It’s was about to happen. Totalitarian Feminazis can’t wait too long to try to push their propaganda bulls~~~. Their idea of freedom is to twist and censor any opinon that doesn’t push their ideology. Just remember what happened with GamerGate wikipedia page in 2014. It only took them a few hours to create a totally false narrative.

    "We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

    #169117
    Mango Ingaway
    Mango Ingaway
    Participant
    2264

    “This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia’s deletion policy.”

    Didn’t they already erase it the first time someone tried to create one?
    Seems like we’re rustling some jimmies. 🙂

    It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

    #169908
    +2
    Arathorn
    Arathorn
    Participant
    2

    There is now a message on the page that says: This article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia’s deletion policy.

    #170589
    Cyberguy94
    cyberguy94
    Participant
    81

    I checked the page.

    Found out the original article has been reduced to half its original lenght.
    I’ve also noticed that another post in this forum about MGTOW on Wiki has been deleted and can’t be found.

    Are hackers attacking the site again?

    #170666
    Goadsaid
    goadsaid
    Participant
    100

    I may not be a tech/wiki genius but who gets to decide what gets edited, deleted etc. and why? If the page was put up in a particular version, what do they do to change that? Send an email. I’ve never added or deleted anything to wikipedia or wiki or anything but it would seem to me that simply directing them here or to Sandman’s videos would clear up any confusion about the existence of us and also what we are about. I mean, could all of us simply send carbon copies of the same email to get the page back to how we want it?

    #171137
    Himeo
    Himeo
    Participant
    471

    I may not be a tech/wiki genius but who gets to decide what gets edited, deleted etc. and why?

    They have a detailed and biased set of editing rules they follow. They worship the all-important “[Citation Needed]”. The long and short of it is, the best citations are “unbiased” and printed (newspapers, books), but they accept “lesser” evidence (Documentaries, Youtube videos, blogs, etc.). Truth is irrelevant on wikipedia. All that matters is who said what and what form they said it in.

    The reason SJW’s have taken over wikipedia is because they claim every source (of citations: i.e. the person or group saying stuff) they don’t like is biased. There are a lot of bitter old cat ladies moderating wikipedia with nothing but time and an axe to grind..

    This is how women argue. They don’t argue the facts, and just the facts, they attack the messenger not the message. Wikipedia is fatally flawed to fall for this.

    TL;DR Wikipedia Is a glorified gossip game.

Viewing 7 posts - 41 through 47 (of 47 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.