Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › MGTOW now has a wikipedia page. is that new?
Tagged: page edits
This topic contains 46 replies, has 32 voices, and was last updated by Himeo 4 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
Side, I agree with you in every point.
They are just rying to disguise themselves, to get men back to serve them once again.
We must be way more cautious now, as we are going “mainstream”, because they will attempt men into plantation by any means they think will be necessary, just like money, sex, laws and s~~~.
Our victory and our greatest weapon is that we have no demands, there is no negotiation to go back to the plantation. We just want to be left the f~~~ alone.
We will keep winning, brother, as long as we keep our postition.
"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.
The cat is out of the bag now. If the feminuts hijack the MGTOW wiki page, it will only make themselves look bad.. The statistics speak for themselves, MGTOW has nowhere to go but up!
http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/11/15_MAGW_GRAPHICS_w_1191867a.jpg
Anonymous29Let’s not get too excited about it.
It is barely even a start of acknowledgement of MGTOW.
Read it carefully and you will find lot’s of contentious wordage to write book’s about.
All it say’s is that perhaps we do exist and have some valid points/arguments.Check out wiki’s sister site —->http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way
they still tow the feminist /mangina line . . . . and they call them selves rational ?could someone post on the wiki page
MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.
could someone post on the wiki page
Be careful. This is a better article than most new ones, but the article is still being disputed as to whether factual evidence is prevalent. There’s also the issue of having it being merged back again to the men’s rights movement, although I’d rather have it stay distant from it.
The page does need to be cited in other relevant articles in order for it to get attention. So for now, this may mean nothing.
Also, this page could be deleted or all the information could be deleted, like with what someone did with Donald Trump’s page.
And being on Wiki adds an air of respectability…
Bulls~~~. Not since they blew how much they are in league with the social justice warriors after the Gamergate fiasco. Wikipedia is compromised.
We made it gentlemen.
We are recognized… which is actually counterproductive if we are ghosting. As long as we do not reveal ourselves, we’re alive and fine.Nevertheless we are not entirely powerless. We have gained the grip of the things and that’s a great start.
We are so many and most of us are protected from the devastating s~~~storms… their charms into marrying us.
We’re taking the lead."We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."
The female social matrix is adapting to us. Do not be fooled by the increase in NAWALT’s.
Still, it’s fun to poke the hive (Wiki is heavily biased towards SJW’s and Feminists).
The female social matrix is adapting to us. Do not be fooled by the increase in NAWALT’s.
Still, it’s fun to poke the hive (Wiki is heavily biased towards SJW’s and Feminists).
Agreed. Trying to broadcast this to women is a bad idea. You just want to reach men. Wiki is sjw territory.
That’s why i f~~~ing hate xpallodoc. He tells women about mgtow who are attractive bitches he clearly just wants to bang. I don’t get why people bash Sandman but don’t go after xpallodoc who is clearly compromising mgtow.
Well that didn’t take long. It’s already been bastardised within a few days of being put up..
Anonymous2Good stuff. Could do with a bit more content, can’t we put together a history of our epic wins on the page?? How about the BBC battle? I think the page should sing out hope and technology for the future of men virtually having the blue pill fantasy without any of the legal, mental, zombie bulls~~~.
It looks like the page will survive but it needs to be a hell of a lot longer and include a lose but useful definition of MGTOW. It needs to be really good if it is going to stand much longer than a few weeks.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
Anonymous29It looks like the page will survive but it needs to be a hell of a lot longer and include a lose but useful definition of MGTOW. It needs to be really good if it is going to stand much longer than a few weeks.
What makes you think it will be removed ?
i’m surprised it’s still up.
the SJW’s are already trying to delete it / f~~~ it up even more, and ban it from wiki again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way
My Goal: To Leave Society.
The article has be severely edited.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Thanks for bringing this.
The Wikipedia page is now permanently archived here:
Not a bad breakdown at all! Surprising and it goes to show the shaming and cultural perception of MGTOW is not a “joke” anymore. AND they remained true to the core fundamentals.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.And PS…. I don’t know where I just read this, but apparently someone thinks the Wikipedia page has been / will be altered. If this happens could someone please alert us.
For now we have it archived as above, but if it is potentially/eventually stricken or altered would be grateful if you could point it out. Thanks. We will try and remember to check it out.
It should be added to our site / about / homepage some way in the next batch of updates.
Thanks.If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.It has been altered. Oh yes, it has.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
It has been altered. Oh yes, it has.
Fascinating.
OK have also archived the new one. Lying bitches ay???
Says: “BBC television personality Reggie Yates did a documentary on Britons who take part in the manosphere. He also attempted to contact MGTOW, but none of them could be reached for comment.[7]”
What a LIE. Dishonest pieces of s~~~.
BBC LIES:
BBC MORE LIES:
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.A journalist who lies?! Gee, that’s never happened before! (Muffled laughter up sleeve here.)
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678