MGTOW now has a wikipedia page. is that new?

[Dark KenshiParticipant 2132]

Side, I agree with you in every point.

They are just rying to disguise themselves, to get men back to serve them once again.

We must be way more cautious now, as we are going “mainstream”, because they will attempt men into plantation by any means they think will be necessary, just like money, sex, laws and s~~~.

Our victory and our greatest weapon is that we have no demands, there is no negotiation to go back to the plantation. We just want to be left the f~~~ alone.

We will keep winning, brother, as long as we keep our postition.

"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.

[MIKETOWParticipant 757]

The cat is out of the bag now. If the feminuts hijack the MGTOW wiki page, it will only make themselves look bad.. The statistics speak for themselves, MGTOW has nowhere to go but up!

http://media.breitbart.com/media/2015/11/15_MAGW_GRAPHICS_w_1191867a.jpg

[Anonymous 29]

Let’s not get too excited about it.

It is barely even a start of acknowledgement of MGTOW.
Read it carefully and you will find lot’s of contentious wordage to write book’s about.
All it say’s is that perhaps we do exist and have some valid points/arguments.

Check out wiki’s sister site —->http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way
they still tow the feminist /mangina line . . . . and they call them selves rational ?

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

could someone post on the wiki page

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Blue Skies wrote:

could someone post on the wiki page

Be careful. This is a better article than most new ones, but the article is still being disputed as to whether factual evidence is prevalent. There’s also the issue of having it being merged back again to the men’s rights movement, although I’d rather have it stay distant from it.

The page does need to be cited in other relevant articles in order for it to get attention. So for now, this may mean nothing.

Also, this page could be deleted or all the information could be deleted, like with what someone did with Donald Trump’s page.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

And being on Wiki adds an air of respectability…

Bulls~~~. Not since they blew how much they are in league with the social justice warriors after the Gamergate fiasco. Wikipedia is compromised.

[AscendedParticipant 698]

We made it gentlemen.
We are recognized… which is actually counterproductive if we are ghosting. As long as we do not reveal ourselves, we’re alive and fine.

Nevertheless we are not entirely powerless. We have gained the grip of the things and that’s a great start.
We are so many and most of us are protected from the devastating s~~~storms… their charms into marrying us.
We’re taking the lead.

"We are free to follow our own path. There are those who will take that freedom from us, and too many of you gladly give it. But it is our ability to choose – whatever you think is true – that makes us human. There is no book or teacher to give you the answers, to show you the path. Choose your own way! Do not follow me, or anyone else."

[HimeoParticipant 471]

The female social matrix is adapting to us. Do not be fooled by the increase in NAWALT’s.

Still, it’s fun to poke the hive (Wiki is heavily biased towards SJW’s and Feminists).

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Himeo wrote:

The female social matrix is adapting to us. Do not be fooled by the increase in NAWALT’s.

Still, it’s fun to poke the hive (Wiki is heavily biased towards SJW’s and Feminists).

Agreed. Trying to broadcast this to women is a bad idea. You just want to reach men. Wiki is sjw territory.

That’s why i f~~~ing hate xpallodoc. He tells women about mgtow who are attractive bitches he clearly just wants to bang. I don’t get why people bash Sandman but don’t go after xpallodoc who is clearly compromising mgtow.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

Well that didn’t take long. It’s already been bastardised within a few days of being put up..

[Anonymous 2]

Good stuff. Could do with a bit more content, can’t we put together a history of our epic wins on the page?? How about the BBC battle? I think the page should sing out hope and technology for the future of men virtually having the blue pill fantasy without any of the legal, mental, zombie bulls~~~.

[AttonParticipant]

It looks like the page will survive but it needs to be a hell of a lot longer and include a lose but useful definition of MGTOW. It needs to be really good if it is going to stand much longer than a few weeks.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 29]

Atton wrote:

It looks like the page will survive but it needs to be a hell of a lot longer and include a lose but useful definition of MGTOW. It needs to be really good if it is going to stand much longer than a few weeks.

What makes you think it will be removed ?

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

i’m surprised it’s still up.

the SJW’s are already trying to delete it / f~~~ it up even more, and ban it from wiki again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Men_Going_Their_Own_Way

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

The article has be severely edited.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Thanks for bringing this.

The Wikipedia page is now permanently archived here:

/content/pages/mgtow/

Not a bad breakdown at all! Surprising and it goes to show the shaming and cultural perception of MGTOW is not a “joke” anymore. AND they remained true to the core fundamentals.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

And PS…. I don’t know where I just read this, but apparently someone thinks the Wikipedia page has been / will be altered. If this happens could someone please alert us.

For now we have it archived as above, but if it is potentially/eventually stricken or altered would be grateful if you could point it out. Thanks. We will try and remember to check it out.

It should be added to our site / about / homepage some way in the next batch of updates.
Thanks.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RoyDalParticipant]

It has been altered. Oh yes, it has.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

RoyDal wrote:

It has been altered. Oh yes, it has.

Fascinating.

OK have also archived the new one. Lying bitches ay???

/content/pages/wiki/

Says: “BBC television personality Reggie Yates did a documentary on Britons who take part in the manosphere. He also attempted to contact MGTOW, but none of them could be reached for comment.[7]”

What a LIE. Dishonest pieces of s~~~.

---

BBC LIES:

---

BBC MORE LIES:

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RoyDalParticipant]

A journalist who lies?! Gee, that’s never happened before! (Muffled laughter up sleeve here.)

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Author]

Posts