@can’t-stump-trump Dude, how do you explain women outperforming men with high ACT and SAT scores and outperforming men in universities?
Citation needed. I am a high school teacher, and far more aware of statistical trends related to standardized test scores than you. Men have outperformed women on the SAT every year of its existence (https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/conf_achgapwomen_allspach.pdf), something which I also consistently see in my profession, as I happen to teach an SAT prep course. The gender parity on SAT scores is statistically significant, and my own experience teaching correlates to the aggregate perfectly.
While it is often true that girls have higher GPAs than boys, GPA is far from an objective standard. Most teachers are women and favor (consciously or unconsciously) girls in their grading. The education system is also largely tailored towards the female methods of learning (art, projects, feelings, and cuddles) as opposed to the male method of learning (rigorous and disciplined drills, memorization, and analysis).
When every subjective measure of intelligence favors women, and every objective measure favors men, what does that tell you about (a) the gender parity in intelligence, and (b) the way our society evaluates them? Clearly the education system favors women as much as possible, and even DESPITE this men still outperform women, with the entire deck stacked against them, the moment an objective standard like the SAT is brought into play. Refer to the following video from Turd Flinging Monkey for further arguments proving men are far more intelligent than women: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kNbMRmtEoS0
Yes, Western Civilization was built almost entirely by the great minds of men, but that is due to a vast difference in interests.
Peculiar. Men have outstripped women in every area of expertise purely because of interest? Did it occur to you that this interest might be biologically influenced by the roles nature designed men and women for? People are interested in what they’re good at. Men are interested in ideas because their purpose is to invent, create, and build. Women are interested in people because their purpose is to bear and raise children. If women can do what men can do, why haven’t they ever? Refer to the following video from Colttaine about what men and women as groups have contributed to society. It’s long, but if you really are interested in finding the answers to your questions (and not just trolling), you’ll take the time to watch. Trust me, your mind will be blown by his eloquence and impeccable logic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9Yn3i-DMKw
As for blaming Marxism for problems that women themselves obviously caused, this is nothing but white knighting. Like the tradcons, you’re willing to lay the blame on everyone but the women themselves. Men like Cato the Elder, Confucius, and St. Paul were making the same observations about female nature and why women should never be given authority under any circumstances centuries before Marx was born. Matriarchies have always been primitive s~~~holes, while patriarchies grew into kingdoms, empires, and great civilizations. Marxism and feminism make good bedfellows, but feminism is merely the politicization of female nature. Women are collectivists by nature because they value security more than freedom, so feminism and Marxism go hand in hand, but one did not cause the other.
Anyone ever hear of a happy husband?
Rarely. Most of the people I know who got married ended up divorced paying alimony for life to their ex-c~~~ while she and Chad f~~~ every day in the house the husband bought and paid for with his hard earned money. But even if I grant happy marriages exist, would you pull the pin on a grenade simply because some grenades are duds and won’t kill you? Would you eat an M&M out of a bowl if you knew half of them were poisonous and would kill you?
I also presume that there are very few religious people here, considering Christians believing the family to be the keystone of society.
As one of the primary apologists for Christianity on this entire site, I find it ironic that you would question the presence of religious people in a response to one of my comments. Though you may have been here a while, you certainly haven’t taken the time to get to know the members of this site. So since you seem to take Christianity seriously, let me tell you what St. Paul said:
“Let women be subject to their husbands, as to the Lord: Because the husband is the head of the wife, as Christ is the head of the church.” (Ephesians 5:22-23)
And again:
“I do not permit a woman to teach or to have authority over a man. She must be quiet.” (Timothy 2:12)
And from Solomon himself:
“What my soul still seeks and has yet to find is this: ‘One man out of a thousand have I found, but a woman among them all I have not found.'” (Ecclesiastes 7:28)
Once again, I am not anti-family in the abstract sense. But the Bible teaches that wives must submit to their husbands and never be given authority over men. In the current system, by law, husbands have no authority over their wives, and wives are given default custody of the children in the event of a divorce. This is not a workable system, and it is the reason that marriage must be avoided at all costs.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
MGTOW_Mike 1 year, 8 months ago.
