Men in surplus.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

Suggestius wrote:

criminally charged with social parasitism

Wow! I’m starting to LOVE the Soviet Union. But I don’t think the US has enough prisons. Maybe we could put them on a chain gang and have them build a wall or something.

Now, where to put it?????????

Order the good wine

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

TaxGuy wrote:

Wow! I’m starting to LOVE the Soviet Union.

This coin has the other side. Bad workers knew they won’t be kicked out of the job. It was hard to fire employees because of different Labor Unions which were ready to fight for them any moment. Would you like to tolerate your coworker doing something f~~~ing up every day?

Another example, you are a writer, but it doesn’t matter if you are writing books day and night long. If you are not in the Writers Union you would be charged for social parasitism. Logic is simple – if you are an independet writer than it’s impossible to put you under censorship and one day you may have published something that contradicts to the main line of the ideology. The Party doesn’t need it.

Good example is a famous Soviet rocker whose name was Victor Tsoi. He was gathering stadiums, been an idol for generations, but was forced to work for a stoker so to avoid of being charged with social parasitism because rock wasn’t welcome by the Soviet authorities.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[JVBParticipant]

Yes love the wall. But who will pay for it ?

Peace is > piece.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Badger wrote:

Women are capable of doing these and many other things that men are able to do, but the major problem in our culture now is women don’t think they have to do anything but leech off some man. Over and over you read here how they don’t even think they need to keep house or cook. So many of them consider themselves to be better or superior to men and have little respect for men. They think they are justified in being promiscuous or cheating in marriage.

The same in Russia. But that’s why I didn’t speak about exact cultures or countries. Modern women (both western and westernized) are now spoiled. My theory is about equal capabilities of the both genders. And in my strong opinion it’s the both stupid and dangerous to underestimate women.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Suggestius wrote:

Gentlemen, I’ll be brief.

Faust, I saw someone has written on the forum that by asking “where have all the good men gone” women mean “Where are all the alphas?”

Awakned, you live in the past. World of the first half of the XX century was built by men. Being a housewife was normal in those times and many women was poorly educted. But in the middle of the past century number of skilled and eductaed women was growing up. During World War II women sucsesfully replaced men at many places. They were vechicle operators, conveyor assemblers, farmers and even military pilots. So they can do everything the men can do, except sperm production.

Boar, one of the biggest mysteries is how have we gained such creativity. Yes, it makes the Humans noticeably different to other Earth species. But your c~~~ will be still getting hard for a naked attractive female with bedroom eyes. This unites you with the all other living beings on the planet. The only difference is you can say “no” to her and males of animals/insects cannot.

Well animal can say “no” to a female.
/forums/topic/mgtow-lion/

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/china/Male-panda-refuses-sex-in-live-show-on-China-TV/articleshow/46825946.cms

There are probably more animals that are hard to get on video or the video is not popular.

As for women can do what a man do. There are SOME women that can do what a man does. It will be hard press to find a woman that can do as well as man. If 80% men are gone surely some women can survive as well as a large population of women that cannot survive because there are much fewer people who grow foods. It will take a generation or more for women to adjust to the new lifestyle. Some women can adjust immediately but a large number cannot. Maybe technology and civilization go back a few generation to accommodate the new adjustments.

Women generally are inferior to men in getting things done.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

It’s impressive. Then, creativity is the only that makes a difference between humans and other planetary living beings.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

I won’t be commenting anything. You decide.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[KeymasterKeymaster]

“It’s Not Your Imagination, Single Women: There Literally Aren’t Enough Men Out There”:
https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/youre-single-because-there-arent-enough-men-253

THE END.

^ Take Note how “every guy she goes out with is an asshole”, “below her league”….. but she’s “amazing in every way”.

There is no surplus of men.
There is a surplus of supremely arrogant bitches though.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

Suggestius wrote:

As for women can do what a man do. There are SOME women that can do what a man does. It will be hard press to find a woman that can do as well as man.

There are a few women who are extremely skilled and capable. The American sharpshooter Annie Oakley defeated here future husband in a challenge match. Few men were able to match her skill. That is what Suggestius is saying. NO, not all women choose to develop their abilities to the level of a man, but they are inherently capable of doing so in some cases. Why bother to develop skills when it easier to induce a man to marry you and have him support you?

http://www.historynet.com/annie-oakley

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Since I was 18 I had more than 20 permanent girlfriends including those I lived with, and few more just as sexual partners. No need in a dozen examples more. In the same time your second link is much useful. And I’ll use it for a further development of my theory. Obviously I can start with this.

The male working-class (today it’s hard to imagine the female working-class, but I reminds you it did exist) feels a shortage of women for dating with. Because there is for 35 percent more of the women than the men who are University graduates, and they aren’t looking for poorly educated guys. So, the number of educated women grows. Along with feminism (support by a government) and projects like “He-for-She” women will be getting more skills. We are watching men and women switched to opposite. In the past women were less educated, but for now these are the men who become less educated.

Think of it, just a hundred years ago that was unbelievable to see a woman operating a tower crane, but in the middle of the XX century we have seen many of them in the operator’s cabin. Women are learning pretty quick if it’s necessary. By gaining higher education these will be the women who sit in the boss chairs.

But, gentlemen, you are loosing me amongst this bunch of details. I’m trying to see much further – over the horizon. I try to understand if humanity is moving to the woman’s world. Because when I’m looking around I’m finding more proves of Earth is the female’s world. If it’s pre-programmed by the Nature then we can say for sure we are observing a transformation into the Matriarchy.

Anonymous wrote:

It’s not nice to f~~~ with mother nature, she a woman and she’s a BITCH!

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[GrumpyParticipant]

First I’d like to point out that based on current MSM reports/propaganda there is actually a surplus of women.

Especially in North America (50.6% avg) = USA 50.8% women – Canada 50.4% women
Assuming you are in the Russian Federation, there is also a surplus of women (53.9%)

Next I will post this current link (2013) of population by gender.
Contrary to populist opinion there ARE ONLY 2 F~~~ING GENDERS. (sexuality is open to interpretation)
http://www.worldometers.info/world-population/world-population-gender-age.php

Please take the time to review the numbers and the economic/industrial regions together.
The striking contrast is that all industrialized nations (you know, where the ALL f~~~ing money is generated and feminism runs rampant), and also areas where warfare is “normal” are seeing a decline in the male populations.

As an aside. The only reason a woman can do anything she wants to do, is because men made it safer and possible for her to do it. That is not hyperbole, just a historical fact.

The one point that isn’t being addressed is that these are birth rates, not death rates.
The other point not being addressed is would women migrate to the culture/area in question where the men do out number the women?

Where are all the **** men they ask.
The answer is all men are dying or saying screw this s~~~ almost as fast as a women changes her mind

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Grumpy, my topic is entitled “Men in surplus”. Definition from the Oxfrod dictionary:
Surplus – an amount of something left over when requirements have been met.
So I strongly doubt if women ever may be in surplus. One woman, normaly, is capable to give a birth to one child per a year. In the same time one man can inseminate few women per a week (even more if he is healthy). So as I said before – the woman’s society doesn’t need a big number of men.

Grumpy wrote:

Assuming you are in the Russian Federation, there is also a surplus of women (53.9%)

PS: According to Rosstat the men-women ratio in Russia (2016) is 1000:1158 by other words here are 67,7 mln men per 78,5 mln women. It’s roughly 16%. Only at the ages of 65-80 the ratio is rapidly changing to 1:2 and then 1:3. And this is an interesting detail. At these ages males, by our nature, are useles for being the both defenders and inseminators.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

Veteran MGTOW members don’t care if there are 100 women to each man, because under the current punitive laws toward men, MGTOW veterans want to avoid marrying, cohabitating, or having anything other than minimal contact with them.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Of course it’s better to be MGTOW then been sent to a war. We would leave women along with their helots with a big pleasure. But we cannot escape from the government runs by females and their branlessly loyal manginas.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[,Participant 1301]

Feminism is the war thrust upon US. Like we had a choice?

The carousel makes the physical surplus meaningless. Even when mgtows outnumber the whiteknights and manginas the c~~~s will have a SlurpUs surplus that they’ll pass around or wage battle over. That is, IF feminism stays powerful.

our smart choice NOW is that we can walk away, it may cost us tenured drafted legions to exit but to those new recruits, beware, stay back.
It should weaken feminism but the conquering will require direct action as in politics and law and marketing and taking the narrative. We that walk away are imo the grass roots and may be susceptible to a fake order of organization. Procreation will continue. We will need to educate the young.

edited for adds and spellings.

with joy/without hate

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

No, it’s not a war. It’s just a phatos to an opposition between two sides like it was in the time of so-called the Cold War. If my theory is correct then MGTOW can outnumber those guys only once. After that MGTOW will not exist. Evolution doesn’t need living beings who cannot reproduce themselves, or more likely to say when the Evolution doesn’t need in exact living beings they stop to reproduce itself.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Grumpy wrote:

Where are all the **** men they ask.
The answer is all men are dying or saying screw this s~~~ almost as fast as a women changes her mind

It’s really very simple. There is no dearth of males in this country… when women say “where have all the good men gone” they mean “where are all the dick swinging douchebags who get my vagina tingling but who aren’t going to pump and dump me and treat me like s~~~”.

It’s not that they can’t find a man, they just can’t find a male unicorn… and they won’t settle for less. Just like us, even the ugly women think they deserve a perfect man who gets them wet AND makes them feel special and who stays around and treats them like princesses. Isn’t that what blue pill men want as well? A hot chick who is a lady in the streets and a whore in the sheets, but only for them, who is loyal and appreciative and who can make sandwiches and give blowjobs?

None of us are going to find one of those and none of them are going to find the male equivalent they’re looking for. It’s not hard to figure out… the problem is that everyone expects something that would be too good for them even if it did exist, which it doesn’t.

The only real difference… and this is key… is that a man can get by without a woman but a woman can’t get by without a man (or the collective resources of all men, seized by the government and handed to them for nothing).

When either women can survive in the world without income redistribution or the government starts seizing pussy and passing it around with no strings attached to pathetic horny men who can’t get laid on their own, we’ll really and truly have equality. Until then, who gives a s~~~ what women say? We’re going our own way after all, right?

[,Participant 1301]

Stargazer wrote:

The only real difference… and this is key… is that a man can get by without a woman but a woman can’t get by without a man (or the collective resources of all men, seized by the government and handed to them for nothing).

When either women can survive in the world without income redistribution or the government starts seizing pussy and passing it around with no strings attached to pathetic horny men who can’t get laid on their own, we’ll really and truly have equality. Until then, who gives a s~~~ what women say? We’re going our own way after all, right?

Right On, right on.

OH GEEZE the gov’t passing out vagina like old cheese…
there IS only one way <clitose intolerant>

with joy/without hate

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

Stargazer wrote:

When either women can survive in the world without income redistribution or the government starts seizing pussy and passing it around with no strings attached to pathetic horny men who can’t get laid on their own, we’ll really and truly have equality.

Agafia Lykova she is a 72 now. This woman lived deep in the taiga since her birth, and lived there alone for the last 29 years.

The photo of the first encounter. She is young there.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[HemeriosParticipant 35]

Well good topic, I don’t know everything about viking culture but that comes closes to woman equality on the battle field.
The point on safety in society is also correct, 400 years ago if a woman walked around then like they do now in the summer today she will be raped 10 times from home to market to home. They became lazy under our wings and the introduction of chivalry in society instead of the battle field where it should have stayed didn’t make it any better. Point is it is expected that the male works itself to death and we do more extremes sports and die at battlefields in larger quantities then females do.
They can do the same work as us but don’t have our mentality to push on and take the risks when needed to.

Cid Highwind the most badass MGTOW in gaming history and a great role model!

[Author]

Posts