Marry a mgtow

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

So this is how I see things going

1. Divorce count going up

2. Marriage count going down

3. Single mums going up

4. Single guys mgtow

So the government needs a new way to pay for those poor unmarried, fatherless kids & mothers/lonley women.

Single guys with their money will be a new tax target. So they will hit them or give bigger tax breaks if you’re married.

Answer:

Single mgtow marries single mgtow ☺

Both sign prenup about not taking anything from the other and jobs done.

Go back home, carry on with life and give your mgtow husband a call now and then to see how he’s doing 😁

We could start a ‘match up’ site here 😆

Keymaster?

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

If it weren’t for the fact that married filing separately is so expensive I would expect to already be seeing this. If they institute a “single man tax” I definitely see this happening, though I suspect they’ll instead try to hit men on Schedule A by eliminating deductions for single men while increasing those available to single mothers. Which is the taxation way of flushing twice as society spirals down the bowl.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I really like you Sidecar ….. tell me …. what do you do? … are you married? …. how much do you make?

You have lovely eyes 😀

[Anonymous 1]

Hahahaha

This thread is gold. 🙂

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

How cool would it be to have some girl you’ve been dating for a year or two demand to get married and be able to say, “sorry, I’m already married… Me and my buddy sidecar got hitched in vegas last year… “?

Even cooler to be able to say to the tax man, “You cannot tax me on that money as I have the deduction of being married…”.

If everyone should be considered equal under the law, surely that should apply to tax law…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

MGTOW seeks same for tax break.  Must sign prenup.  Me, 47 y/o, employed, HWP, bald, three kids, NS, social drinker, loves to barbecue, (My pork ribs are a dream).  I’m looking for a long lasting relationship in which neither of us know what the inside of each others houses looks like.  Play dates with kids at the park are possible.  I am a decent mechanic, intermediate MS word, excel, power point user.

Seeking life partner to combat penalty taxes for being happy and single, you be the same.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Sky-OParticipant 18990]

It’s like MGTOW gets married to MGTOW for tax purposes

Both are straight

I could see a trend develop after that starts happening where single sluts try to start dating two ‘married’ MGTOW guys in an attempt to guarantee. . .

A MGTOW DP !!

[RoyDalParticipant]

It is a notorious fact that many Hollywood leading men who happen to be gay marry lesbians to present a normal front to the ticket buying public for both of them. An if they have another couple sleep over Saturday night, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Thus, two straits marrying sounds like, well … it could work!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

You guys never disappoint!

Never thought gay marriage laws could be turned into something useful

Bgagagaga

If it is true that the institute of marriage is being dismantled on purpose by social engineers, then we might actually find them supporting MGTOW movement, if that’s what they want. But then if one of their purposes of breaking up families is isolation of males, feminization of them and suppressing their rebellious male features – then the government would be biased against MGTOW. I guess we wait and see

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Russky wrote:

If it is true that the institute of marriage is being dismantled on purpose by social engineers,

Nah. It’s all about the money. Heterosexual marriage rates are dropping into the toilet, which means the number of heterosexual divorces has been falling as well. Fewer heterosexual divorces means less money for divorce lawyers, so they see gay divorces as a lucrative field to shore up their incomes. But before divorce lawyers can leech off gay divorces they need gay marriages…

It’s no coincidence that the strongest proponents for gay marriage in every district are the Bar Associations.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Incorrect, @sidecar. There is only money in divorce if there’s a man and a woman. That means there’s a large transfer of wealth from the male to the prostitute. Otherwise they just separate their things and go their own separate homosexual ways.

[KeithParticipant 482]

My pension has a survivor benefit, so if I treat it as an annuity, market it to a fellow mgtow and the marry him, I can make some cash on something that I would otherwise never recover and if I die before my fellow mgtow he recovers his investment.   **I hope he likes hockey**

I may have consult a actuary. . . . LOL

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

Okay, all of this just occurred to me.  This is what we have to do.  Instead of raging against our gynocentric society, lets start openly supporting and stumping for same sex marriage.  There is a better chance of this happening than getting women to pull their collective heads out of their pxxxxxs.

Now here is where ILiveAgain’s idea really take hold.  Arranged same sex marriages.  The corporate, or blue collar single guy marries another dude that was raped by his ex-wife in the courts.  Dude gets insurance benefits and fulfills the court appointed mandate to provide healthcare insurance for his kids.  Mucho money saved, divorced dude gets a free vasectomy and can afford the occasional bottle of scotch.

What is more, divorced guy can save money, and take his skank ex back to court and demonstrate to the judge how he is in a stable relationship and is better suited to raising kids than his ex that is trooping barley legal c~~~ in and out of the front door.

This works on so many levels that my brain hurts.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

LOL!!!

Not a bad concept but I’m pretty sure the federal Leviathan and state mafia will catch on and put a stop to it.

 

[narwhalParticipant]

Although it sounds great, there are still some major pitfalls.  Marriage means you are legal thought of as 1 entity when it comes to finances. So if your partner has debt, so do you.  If your partner has serious medical issues,  the hospitals comes after you for money.  If he get’s sued, so do you, etc, etc.  I still would do it  (marry) if it was some guy I could trust, or even a family member.

I can’t wait to hear the first time something is done and challenged in court.  Are you going to have to prove that you love your partner?  Testify that you’re boinking each other?  Does that mean that if 2 heterosexuals aren’t boinking, they’re marriage is void?  If sex isn’t required, then why can’t I marry a family member? And why can’t I marry more then 1 person at a time  (essentially, a business entity that does no business)?  These are going to be the questions coming up within the next 20 years or so.  It’s going to totally destroy any sense of conventional boundaries to where the gov’t will have no choice but to get out of marriage altogther, which is where they should have gone right from the start.

 

Ok. Then do it.

[Executor MaxwellParticipant 591]

narwhal wrote:

I can’t wait to hear the first time something is done and challenged in court.  Are you going to have to prove that you love your partner?  Testify that you’re boinking each other?  Does that mean that if 2 heterosexuals aren’t boinking, they’re marriage is void?

Don’t be ridiculous, there is no sex in the marriage, just like the standard marriage today. All we want is marriage equality after all.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25019]

@ Scubasteve

They already have OK’d fetuses with 3 parents in Britain:

MPs say yes to three-person babies

By James Gallagher
Health editor, BBC News website
3 February 2015

Public Health Minister Jane Ellison: “This is a bold step”
MPs have voted in favour of the creation of babies with DNA from two women and one man, in a historic move.
The UK is now set to become the first country to introduce laws to allow the creation of babies from three people.

http://www.bbc.com/news/health-31069173

One other advantage of “marrying” a fellow mghow is that there will be a witness should things go sour on one of those flings with a female. We shall call our union permissive and open but only to others of the opposite sex. We keep our feelings for our brothers, I mean husbands, as sacred.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Chuck WowParticipant 141]

Keith wrote:

My pension has a survivor benefit, so if I treat it as an annuity, market it to a fellow mgtow and the marry him, I can make some cash on something that I would otherwise never recover and if I die before my fellow mgtow he recovers his investment. **I hope he likes hockey**

I may have consult a actuary. . . . LOL

There was a manager in my agency that was gay and had a registered domestic partner (about 10 years younger I believe). The manager died two years after retiring and his domestic partner receives a survivor benefit of $92K/year for life. Not a bad deal

[KeithParticipant 482]

A friend of mine has a lesbian daughter and I am attending her wedding in Chicago in July.  I am going to have to ask her about these issues.

This will be my first lesbian wedding, I hope they have a tractor pull at the reception.

 

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[KeithParticipant 482]

Chuck Wow wrote:

There was a manager in my agency that was gay and had a registered domestic partner (about 10 years younger I believe). The manager died two years after retiring and his domestic partner receives a survivor benefit of $92K/year for life. Not a bad deal

My employer recognizes the same sex relationships for all benefit packages, including pensions because marriages are not legal here.  If it becomes legal they only have 90 days to tie the proverbial knot.

the health care benefit alone is worth about $400.00 a month. . . lol

 

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[Author]

Posts