Libtards have won! Gay sex legalized in India.

Topic by Varun

Varun

Home Forums MGTOW Central Libtards have won! Gay sex legalized in India.

This topic contains 31 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by Eric Lauder  Eric Lauder 1 year, 4 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #855617
    +3
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Eric Lauder, I think you are being a little harsh when you suggest I might be retarded.
    If a state makes something illegal, they are sending a signal to the people about the general public sentiment around it -that it is not a good choice.

    Using the law as an educative tool to force a social agenda is a feminist concept: the law is meant to avoid actual harm to society.

    It is then possible to turn a blind eye to it when it comes to enforcement. An example would be the possession of cannabis in several countries.

    But this sends another message: “the state is inefficient/corrupt, that’s why laws aren’t being enforced”

    There is a huge difference between turning a blind eye to something and promoting it. The moment you legalise what has been illegal you are promoting it.

    No.
    Example being Putin’s Russia: homosexual sex isn’t a crime, while homosexual propaganda is a crime.
    Example number 2 being mgtow.com: a member can be openly gay/bisexual, what he can’t do is to promote gay sex as “a tool to fight against gynocentrism” – because the latter it’s clearly a scam (feminists do it with lesbianism) while the former is a feature and nothing more.

    Look at your TV screen on an average Saturday night and see how many homosexuals are all over it. Are there more or less than when Obama legalised homosexual marriage? Are there more or less homosexual couples on TV shows?

    That’s because it’s a new thing and therefore perceived as trendy.
    It’ll become boring to the general public when the trend will pass: a *yawn* is immensely more powerful than blame and harsh criticism.

    The legalisation has become a sort of promotion.

    Nope.
    You’re talking a about a recent trend following legalisation of homosexual marriage, we’re discussing about decriminalization of homosexual sex: sodomy laws were abolished in USA starting in 1962 and most states had already abolished them by 1985. Therefore the trend you see in TV is unrelated with decriminalization of homosexual sex.

    In the end homosexuality is a reproductive disability -it makes it harder to reproduce because you seek sexual gratification from men and they can’t give you children.

    Homosexuality make impossible to reproduce, not just “harder”.

    Some people are born homosexual, others are born swinging both ways and can be nudged into one life or the other depending one the reinforcement they get from early sexual experiences. It is not an ideal life.

    You don’t know the dynamic at play.
    Men who are bisexual are more or less equally attracted to both women and men, usually men who are bisexual tend to be more attracted towards women than to men (there’s a biological reason for that: women need just only to look fertile to be f~~~able, so it’s 80% women being attractive to them).
    BUT
    A lot, very likely most, bisexual men tend to become exclusively gay.
    This isn’t due propaganda, this is due attrition: there’s such word as an “easy woman” but there’s no such word as an “easy man” because all men are easy compared to women.
    Thefore bisexual men switching to full gay is just common sense in the long-run: a bisexual man who would be equally attracted to both women and men, and being himself average looking and average wealthy, is practically destined to become gay in the long run. The bisexual men who doesn’t switch to full gay are either much more sexually attracted to women than to men or they’re better looking/more wealthy than average, or both.

    It isn’t about propaganda: indeed pure lesbians are extremly rare, and bisexual women tend to become straight.
    Because for a woman it’s the very opposite, it’s easier to be straight: a woman just have to sit on her hands and wait for men making efforts to impress her. While being lesbian require them to do quite a lot of work, and furthermore lesbians do not have men to exploit for cash and prizes.

    If you want to see it being easier to be accepted as a bachelor then yes this is good news but it is rather selfish good news.

    MGTOW is about self-preservation above all else, other thoughts come after self-preservation.

    My idea is that old school ideas cannot save western society, because it’s exactly old school ideas who were exploited by feminists: in example feminism could never succeed without chivalry and men being ready to sacrifice themselves for women’s wellbeing.
    Indian culture have similar weaknesses, and the feminists are already exploting it: in example in India it’s legal for adult women to have sex with little boys, while it’s a crime for adult men to have sex with little girls. Even if that’s unnatural and absolutely anti-biology: in nature a powerful adult man can provide for a whole harem of young women and even teens, and having a lot of healthy offspring, while an adult woman getting pregnant from a little boy unable to provide for her while pregnant would be a biological dead end.
    The above behavior is fully unnatural, against biology, and yet there’s a similar attitude in the whole west, and yet in India it’s even enshrined within the law.

    I am a reluctant MGHOW. I do not like the world being all messed up. MGTOW is to my mind the escape pod from a burning culture, set on fire by liberalism and feminism (which is a child of liberalism). I never wanted our culture to burn. I don’t want India to burn either. I am not, however, Tuna.

    MGTOW provide actual benefits, immediate benefits, compared to having legal duties towards women: the report of the bank account isn’t an opinion, it’s hard numbers.
    On the other hand, society can’t be saved trying to keep to do the same, since it was the old attitudes who enabled feminism. It’s quite the opposite: “let it burn” is much likely to end feminism, because men not caring force women to deal with actual responsibilities and actual issues, and most women would rather wear a burqa than having actual responsibilites…

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #855625
    +3
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    Your uncle was among those who wished to force you the make a pact to defend your female cousin, right? Without nothing in exchange from her, right?
    If it’s so, then tell to your mangina uncle to go to f~~~ himself.
    The decriminalization of gay sex in your country greatly improves your chances to be stealth: the more homosexuality is viewed as normal, the more men’s singlehood is even more normalized, the more no one gives a f~~~ about your marital status and the more no one gives a f~~~ about the fact you don’t have a woman.

    Yes he did. And if I try to voice up against him, a lot of people are gonna be p~~~ed. Better let him stay in his blue pill euphoria.

    I agree its becoming more of a promotion. A publicity stunt. The common discussion is that people are doing it “just” because they can. The lgbt community over here is way too small to be exploited politically.

    But this might just be the beginning of what has already happened in the west. Mind you, once you get the courts in your pocket, you can do just about anything. Less than a quarter of the population is well-educated enough to reason and see through bulls~~~.

    Its gonna be one hell of a s~~~storm in the coming years. The good ol’ glory days are over.

    I’m leaving for 6 months to India to set up a shop that will be selling rainbow merchandise to those 1.3 billion people!
    I’ll come back a multimillionaire!

    You won’t be disappointed. We buy dildos for head massages over here. xD

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #855646
    +2
    JVB
    JVB
    Participant

    Gay , arranged marriages. Sound like a winner

    Peace is > piece.

    #855647
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Your uncle was among those who wished to force you the make a pact to defend your female cousin, right? Without nothing in exchange from her, right?If it’s so, then tell to your mangina uncle to go to f~~~ himself.The decriminalization of gay sex in your country greatly improves your chances to be stealth: the more homosexuality is viewed as normal, the more men’s singlehood is even more normalized, the more no one gives a f~~~ about your marital status and the more no one gives a f~~~ about the fact you don’t have a woman.

    Yes he did. And if I try to voice up against him, a lot of people are gonna be p~~~ed. Better let him stay in his blue pill euphoria.
    I agree its becoming more of a promotion. A publicity stunt. The common discussion is that people are doing it “just” because they can. The lgbt community over here is way too small to be exploited politically.
    But this might just be the beginning of what has already happened in the west. Mind you, once you get the courts in your pocket, you can do just about anything. Less than a quarter of the population is well-educated enough to reason and see through bulls~~~.
    Its gonna be one hell of a s~~~storm in the coming years. The good ol’ glory days are over.

    I’m leaving for 6 months to India to set up a shop that will be selling rainbow merchandise to those 1.3 billion people!I’ll come back a multimillionaire!

    You won’t be disappointed. We buy dildos for head massages over here. xD

    My idea is that what happened in the west is happening even in India, and homosexuality being normalized is just a consequence, a side effect.

    What happened in the west is:

    There was a model: two heterosexuals living together for their whole adult life.

    This model is now outdated, most people don’t live like that, two cases:
    USA 52% people are never married, among those who signed marriage contract about 50% divorced. That’s about 75% outside the above model, the above model is for 25%, and that’s a minority.
    Italy 34% people are never married, among those who signed marriage contract about 33% divorced. That’s about 66% outside the above model, the above model is for 33%, and that’s a minority.
    Countries like Portugal, Belgium and Spain have even narrower minorities following the old model: their divorce rate is respectively 71%, 61% and 58%.
    France have a 55% divorce rate.
    Russia have a 52% divorce rate.
    And mind that the above percentages but the first two are very likely to be higher, because I took them from 2011 stats: those 7 years old stats say that divorce rate is 46% in USA (while it has already surpassed 50%) and 25% in Italy (while it has already surpassed 33%), so France it’s likely to be about 60% and Russia about 55% or even more. And Portugal about 75%.

    Since the above model is dead, then all the alternative lifestyles become acceptable:
    Single for life
    Polyamory
    Same-sex relationships

    Those three alternative lifestyles are just a symptom, something that has become possible due the fail of the old model.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #855881
    +1
    Uchibenkei
    uchibenkei
    Participant
    7965

    i don’t care what consenting adults do as long as it doesn’t affect me. I’m against marriage with women. Gay marriages last longer than any other. Let the gays have it. Why do you care what other people do? 2 more men who won’t marry women. ha ha ha

    That is the problem, what they want will affect you. It would not be a damned issue if they would go back into a quiet little community and shut the f~~~ up, but that never happens. It is in your face, only my way or legal action. Having to see that crap all over the damned place. Can’t watch any TV show with out it being front and center some way or other.

    i don’t watch tv because it’s for women, and i don’t see s~~~ happening everywhere in front of my face. Nor do i think I will start seeing it everywhere. public displays of affection are frowned upon in most societies even for hetero couples. most of them will marry and shut the f~~~ up. why would being married change their outdoor behavior? It won’t. only women change after marriage. like keymaster says, marriage is for gays. it’s not for straight men. let them have it.

    I bathe in the tears of single moms.

    #855889
    +1
    ScarberianMPTGL
    ScarberianMPTGL
    Participant
    3286

    Gay , arranged marriages. Sound like a winner

    Reminds me of a Russell Peters clip where he talks about Gay Indians. Here, I found it:

    I, Lelouch Vi Britannia, command you, all of you, to Go Your Own Way!!

    #855902
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    @varun

    I heard that this law was recently, in the last 20 years, mainly used as a useful tool BY WOMEN DIVORCING THEIR HUSBANDS.

    The “anti-gay” law was actually particularly focused against anal sex REGARDLESS IF IT’S AMONG TWO MEN OR AMONG A MAN AND A WOMAN.

    Practical outcome: if you screwed your wife’s ass, thanks to “anti-gay” legislation, she was going to screw you more than usual.

    Can you confirm that?

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #855911
    +2

    Anonymous
    1

    As Milo Yiannopoulous says -being gay lets you get away with saying anything. Its another protected status created by liberalism. It is another group who have rights over and above the normal (like women).

    Yes, in this great Utopia everybody is equal, but some are more equal than others.

    We have a situation where these protected status groups have more rights than the average citizen. Of course this promotes more people to become “protected status” by joining the LGBTQXYZ community.

    #855938
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    I heard that this law was recently, in the last 20 years, mainly used as a useful tool BY WOMEN DIVORCING THEIR HUSBANDS.
    The “anti-gay” law was actually particularly focused against anal sex REGARDLESS IF IT’S AMONG TWO MEN OR AMONG A MAN AND A WOMAN.
    Practical outcome: if you screwed your wife’s ass, thanks to “anti-gay” legislation, she was going to screw you more than usual.
    Can you confirm that?

    The wives over here use every tool at their disposal to get their ground. It wouldn’t surprised me.

    I have heard of a couple of instances where the section 377 (the gay lay) is coupled with a major player, the section 498a (the anti-dowry law) , to convict husbands….and their entire families.. The 498a is a pretty controversial law, and the supreme court itself has said that this law should be used as a shield rather than a weapon.

    The lawyers over here are a terrible bunch. They take advantage of the naive nature of wives to fill their pockets. In most cases, the wives gets like only half of what she becomes entitled to. The rest of the wealth gets sucked up by the courtrooms and lawyers, and other enforcement officials.

    An Indian MRA Deepika Bharadwaj explains it more clearly.

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

    #855983
    +3
    CuckSniper
    CuckSniper
    Participant
    449

    Good. It’s a step in the right direction. The gay men in my city f~~~ing hate females and lesbians. They find them repulsive.

    And it’s not just because “ew vagina”, but they pretty much give the same reasons why we don’t want anything to do with females either.

    But it makes sense why gay men would hate females. Because we all know females hate females and gay men are basically also female LOL

    #856018
    +2
    Narwhal
    narwhal
    Participant

    I don’t view legalization of homosexual activity as a win for liberalism. They sure thought it was in the US, but it really hasn’t strengthen them at all. Liberalism is stronger when it has an establishment to rally against. When the win, they actually lose since there is nothing more to fight against.

    They thought that legalization would change peoples minds on homosexuality. I suppose it did a little, but instead of support, they get indifference. They now have to build more straw mans in order to paint the opposition as evil.

    Ok. Then do it.

    #856040
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    I have heard of a couple of instances where the section 377 (the gay lay) is coupled with a major player, the section 498a (the anti-dowry law) , to convict husbands….and their entire families.. The 498a is a pretty controversial law, and the supreme court itself has said that this law should be used as a shield rather than a weapon.

    It’s enough, I don’t think that there was great focus on HOW such law was used, it’s even very likely that the media did hide such aspect, so the very fact that even don’t minding about such aspect you heard a couple of cases it’s pretty telling, I think.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

Viewing 12 posts - 21 through 32 (of 32 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.