Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Jut another article
This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by Frank V. 3 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Guess what. Its men fault they dont get laid.
PS: Comments are f~~~ing gold!
Always going big, Yeah you know the kid, Call me haymaker.
This article was written by a Helen Carroll. Of course that there would be a woman who would blame it on the men.
"Question everything" - Albert Einstein
Awesome article.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
This was covered in another thread here:
Lots of people commented, good to read.
Frank V.
Hmm.. I did read somewhere that sex actually help females maintain their soft skin and keep it fresh and glowy. Sex is said to be better than drinking water when it comes to maintaining their skin.
…and I’m here wondering why they’re miserable for being celibate.
đ
While some of us MGTOWers enjoy our celibacy, women are made miserable by it.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
As I posted originally:
These bios donât dig nearly as deep as one might think. And, frankly, the headline does not match the content, but you donât have to read that deeply.
Susan:
She last got laid when âWindows 98â was a big deal, AOL was how we got to websites and âDot Comâ was a still a buzz phrase.
And why not ? She was only 38, and we will assume was attractive enough. There where plenty of men, especially younger men, who would have given her sex and companionship.
No, Susan, if I am to make a few reasonably generous assumptions about you (and ask the IT guy for a little research help), I am not buying the claim that, somehow, it is âmenâs faultâ that you havenât been laid since fax machines where still popular.
Simply put, you wanted it on your terms. Like any reasonable effort in life, compromise is required. Be it politics of any kind, designing the next airliner or even balancing the household budget- you have to compromise in life to get anything to happen.
ââŚ.They seem left with an impossible choice: meaningless, soul-sapping casual encounters or decades of celibacyâŚ..â
Poppyc~~~ !
You could have enjoyed the performance and company of a youthful (but very adult) lover. I know because, frankly, I was that younger lover for a few older women growing up.
ââŚ.There must be plenty out there who would like a no-strings relationship, but Iâd end up returning to my flat feeling lonely and rejected, so thatâs not the answerâŚ.â
You where the one who left strings attached, not the men. No, instead of meeting a man with a reasonable compromise, you tried to get it all, and got nothing.
Shirley:
Marriage One: ââŚ.married her first husband aged 16 believing she had found the perfect escape from an unhappy home-lifeâŚ.that marriage, to a man who was ten years her senior, lasted just 18 months.â
So you used and older man to move away. Some would think I was mean to guess that, but I wonder if your birthday, and the timing of certain other events would match up with using him to move out early. If I was consulting on an investigation, I would be neglecting my job if I didnât at least consider it and research it.
Marriage Two: âAged 32, Shirley married her second husband, who owned an engineering company, at a big church wedding in Knightsbridge, followed by a month-long honeymoon in AfricaâŚ..the stress of trying for a baby, discovering that Shirley was infertile and then two rounds of IVF put enormous strain on the marriage, which ended after three yearsâ
So, after waiting at least 14 years to marry a rich man, you blew it by thinking with your womb, rather than being sensible and adopting or just skipping children. My guess is you stressed the poor man out.
In short, you p~~~ed away the efforts of years to find the most âeligible manâ possible, you flush it all down the drain in the rage of âbaby rabiesâ
Marriage Three: ââŚEver hopeful of finding lasting love, she married her third husband within days of meeting him at a wedding in Los AngelesâŚ.realising that she barely knew her husband, divorced him within a year of their weddingâŚ.â
Holy smokes ! A track record like this demonstrates a total inability to make a stable marriage, even by todayâs craptacular standards ! Anyone who has you as a âLife Coachâ needs to listen very closely to what you say, and do the exact opposite.
I suspect you might have been the one who thought the word âcowâ belongs in any clothing line for women. Hereâs a news flash- most women donât like to be associated with the word âcowâ, at least here in the US ! No man implied your product was for âcowsâ- you did !
With a half-clever name, it might be doing better. http://venuscow.co.uk/
ââŚsex should be a reward for men who put them on a pedestalâŚâ
And did you put your men âon a pedestalâ ? No, you just used sex with strings attached to play them like a puppet.
!
Please, donât âblameâ men for being smart enough to look at your record. You make it obvious at this point.Suzie:
Oh what the hell ! This one I really need to let the others savor, but I will leave with this:
If a MGTOW lives sexless or as a âmonkâ, he is ridiculed and others try to shame him instead of respecting his freedom to chose.
But when you promote sexless relationships at https://www.platonicpartners.org/ , itâs just dandy !
Enjoying that passionate affair with double standards ?
Frank V.
Least I forget : Good call OldBill. You got a good eye for this stuff.
Frank V.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678