Its all about what you can do for them… Even just dating

[DanceMyOwnWayParticipant 2096]

What you are talking about is Briffaults law. They always want to know “what’s in it for me.” You don’t have to pay for s~~~ for a woman, often they will pay your way. She sounds highly typical and was already f~~~ing someone else. You bailed and cut her off = good choice. Her behaviour would have worsened. The std test is a good idea as someone else said. These modern chicks will raw dog chads and potential beta orbiters without a second thought. Bear in mind too you will probably meet a lot more of these types.

If you fall down 7 times, get up 8

[ForeverDoneParticipant 2928]

DanceMyOwnWay wrote:

What you are talking about is Briffaults law. They always want to know “what’s in it for me.” You don’t have to pay for s~~~ for a woman, often they will pay your way. She sounds highly typical and was already f~~~ing someone else. You bailed and cut her off = good choice. Her behaviour would have worsened. The std test is a good idea as someone else said. These modern chicks will raw dog chads and potential beta orbiters without a second thought. Bear in mind too you will probably meet a lot more of these types.

Interesting you said that. She did state a few times that when she’s in a LTR, they usually go without a condom and he just pulls out. I asked, are you on birth control? She said no, but since I am in my 40’s I am much less fertile. I think we should stick with condoms I said. She didn’t like as they irritated her pus. This is true as we had long 1 hr+ sex sessions and her pussy walls were as red as a rare steak. I felt bad, so I tried other condoms like the non latex and natural ones. Non latex broke three times and the natural one fell off during sex (no ejaculation). I switched to spermicidal condoms and same issues for her. However, I wasn’t taking a chance. I find it very strange that since my divorce, only one woman I was seeing was on birth control that I actually had sex with. She was only on birth control because it had to regulate her periods or something.

As for this one, I just think it’s weird that a woman, yes, quiet attractive, but a single mother with kids in her early 40’s thinks a guy is not only going to pay 100% for everything, but marry her. Not only marry her, but enable her to not work and just stay home and do whatever she wants. Who would sign up for that? I wouldn’t sign up for that if she was a supermodel without kids. I just felt like I had to pay for her time and sex. If I was going to do that, I could just hire an escort.

I love how women want to be treated with respect and equally, but if a man wants to spend time with her, he has to pay for everything. In the end, aren’t we, as men, just paying for access to her pussy, mouth and ass? If so, what’s the difference between dating a woman and a prostitute; aside the fact that one is completely legal, and the other isn’t?

The other question would be why would I willfully stick with her, pay for her company with food, entertainment, etc. when other men are dicking her down? In addition, since I know she rather go w/o a condom, why would I even do that? So, she wants to hang out with me non-exclusively, but also have the option to see other men. WTF? I do not know how I ever looked or acted like a cuck to her, but that’s not ever going to happen. As I get older, the value of a woman’s “services” seem to be worth less and less to me. It’s just so strange how the world has turned up to where men are basically paying women for their time and the chance to have sex.

[SuggestiusParticipant 3312]

No difference between a modern woman and a prostitute. Some of them even agree with that observation.

Happiness for all and let no one be forgotten ("Roadside picnic", Arkady and Boris Strugatsky)

[Author]

Posts