? Internet Censorship in October

[RoyDalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Anything that works he’s out to f~~~ it up, so rest assured it’s a bad thing that turns worse then implodes…

Yep.

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

This is true, but there is nothing preventing anyone from setting up and running their own DNS system.

Try that in the People’s Republic of China (to name one of many) and you will wake up in a solitary confinement cell.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[sidecarParticipant 35874]

Where, exactly, does Emperor Obama think he is empowered to unilaterally make decisions like this? At the very least, as this is a matter of international contract between nations (a.k.a. a treaty), it should be ratified by congress.

[HitmanParticipant]

every U.S president in their final days in office has done all the dirty work they had trouble with during their presidency.
.
Obombya is NO different.
did you guys see a record number of pardons recently?
more then any president before him..
.
the chinese have a very interesting saying..
” May you live in interesting times ”
.
a double-edged blessing/curse..
.
if we are still here after Oct. !st.
as i think we will be,
then i guess the problem with internet censorship bypassed us..
.
see you in the F.E.M.A. camps in Alaska otherwise..
.
fear mongering is the key to control..
.
aint scared..
.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

The manosphere is strong enough to fight censorship.

The companies just look for money. Throw a few bucks their way and they will open the gates for you.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Varun wrote:

The manosphere is strong enough to fight censorship.

The companies just look for money. Throw a few bucks their way and they wi open the gates for you.

No, we actually NEED to start developing alternatives. This is happening because the megacorps have bought up so much of the web they feel they can control a majority and feed us propaganda in sufficient numbers.

We actually need a new websites and alternatives we can flock to.

[AttonParticipant]

Varun wrote:

The manosphere is strong enough to fight censorship.

The companies just look for money. Throw a few bucks their way and they will open the gates for you.

The thing about the manosphere is that it has an abundance of men in it. Men who just happen to hold skills in programing and networking for a new internet.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Big Boss wrote:

No, we actually NEED to start developing alternatives. This is happening because the megacorps have bought up so much of the web they feel they can control a majority and feed us propaganda in sufficient numbers.

We actually need a new websites and alternatives we can flock to.

Maybe. Or maybe we can bribe them. Think diplomatic.

Atton wrote:

The thing about the manosphere is that it has an abundance of men in it. Men who just happen to hold skills in programing and networking for a new internet.

Internet v2.0? I like it.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

The thing I’m concerned about is how jurisdiction will change after this moronic move. The current freedom of speech, as we’re communicating through the servers in the US is covered by the 1’st amendment. This freedom of speech doesn’t really exist in other countries. If somebody states something right now that goes counter to the gynocratic tyrrants – like statistics of divorce-rape etc. Then that person does not have to fear anything as it’s more or less protected by US law. But if the jurisdiction changes, that person can be charged as it’s no longer protected by the US law. Or am I wrong about this?

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Al BundyParticipant 245]

Big Boss wrote:

No, we actually NEED to start developing alternatives. This is happening because the megacorps have bought up so much of the web they feel they can control a majority and feed us propaganda in sufficient numbers.

We actually need a new websites and alternatives we can flock to.

Wouldn’t it be funny if MGTOW and loosely-affiliated subcultures morphed into something like the fraternal organizations of old? Lodges across the country, smoky back rooms, frank and private conversation between men, real social networks not susceptible to easy Internet espionage or subversion…. Why, it would be enough to give Hitlery the vapors–bring out the fainting couch!

[W]e are MGTOW. We eat shaming language like tic tacs.

--chir

I have known more men destroyed by the desire to have wife and child and to keep them in comfort than I have seen destroyed by drink and harlots.

--William Butler Yeats

[Anonymous 11]

Don’t worry. This really is not that big of a deal. The Internet routes around all damages. It was originally developed to be able to survive a nuclear war.

The kiddie porn rings have built their own encrypted networks on top of the Internet. The FBI recently busted one wide open. Anything is possible with the Internet which is why I don’t ever fully trust it.

Faux News is a joke nearly as much as anti-virus is a joke. At least MSNBC is comical. I would not know anymore though, because I’ve cut the cord.

[aeragoanParticipant 1186]

Well if they try to prosecute us and banned ,i will going to print 1000 mgtow symbols and put it in every f~~~ing men’s toilet in my city..

[Anonymous 3]

Al Bundy wrote:

Big Boss wrote:

No, we actually NEED to start developing alternatives. This is happening because the megacorps have bought up so much of the web they feel they can control a majority and feed us propaganda in sufficient numbers.

We actually need a new websites and alternatives we can flock to.

Wouldn’t it be funny if MGTOW and loosely-affiliated subcultures morphed into something like the fraternal organizations of old? Lodges across the country, smoky back rooms, frank and private conversation between men, real social networks not susceptible to easy Internet espionage or subversion…. Why, it would be enough to give Hitlery the vapors–bring out the fainting couch!

One of the first steps of Cultural Marxism/feminism was to stamp those out of existence. The government, through their useful idiot women, made sure not to allow any male spaces. They would always have females invade, and once a female has invaded the club just can’t work, because women always make everything about themselves and derail any useful discussion. There is no solidarity possible between men with a woman around.

People think that is to prevent men from discussing the truth about feminism and women in general, but that really isn’t the case. The real goal is to keep an oppressive government in power. When men gather and learn the power they have, and learn how the world really works, younger men especially tend to be outraged and wish something better. This is especially true when they look to older men as mentors and also want something better for their mentors.

Stalin and other dictators used to infiltrate resistance groups, get them to gather in one spot, and kill them all in one fell swoop. Often with biological warfare. But just not even allowing groups of men to gather and learn from each other probably works even better. No martyrs that way, no outrage.

[Author]

Posts