I was entitled to nothing

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

Carnage wrote:

This is great.

O agree common law marriage laws are outdated.

The more they change laws against men, the faster SHTF.

BRING IT.

The divorce laws are outdated too but since those benefit the bitch they are OK with it.
Lurkers; This is why cohabitation with women is bad. On a whim they can change the laws overnight and you could be staring down the barrel of a wealth redistribution shotgun.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Monk wrote:

This has been in the pipeline for some time.

The next wave will be that men can be divorce raped at the end of an LTR, even though there was no cohabitation.

All that will be required is evidence of ‘commitment’.

Agitation for this has already begun, although it is relatively low-key at the moment.

Far fetched? An outright ‘man-tax’ has already been tried in Sweden. There also used to be actions for ‘Breach of Promise’.

I foresee an overreaching politician having an icepick driven into their eye-socket by someone like me that lacks both compassion and squeamishness.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Damn. So women want more rights if they don’t get married. And by “rights” they mean access to your money.

I can see it now.

Woman: “I agreed to meet him for a drink your honor. I am obviously entitled to at least half of his fortune. And he stared too long at my boobs. Please lock him up for twenty years.”

Judge: “You poor thing. I’m giving you his house, his car, his pension plan, and he has to make alimony payments the rest of his miserable life. Would locking him up 10 years be sufficient to make you feel better?”

I have never let a woman into my new condo. No way one will spend the night.

[Anonymous 3]

Ranger One wrote:

Monk wrote:

This has been in the pipeline for some time.

The next wave will be that men can be divorce raped at the end of an LTR, even though there was no cohabitation.

All that will be required is evidence of ‘commitment’.

Agitation for this has already begun, although it is relatively low-key at the moment.

Far fetched? An outright ‘man-tax’ has already been tried in Sweden. There also used to be actions for ‘Breach of Promise’.

I foresee an overreaching politician having an icepick driven into their eye-socket by someone like me that lacks both compassion and squeamishness.

You aren’t stupid enough to get married or cohabit though.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22531]

Her quote is total hypergamy and why mgtow is booming everywhere.

“I was shocked I wasn’t entitled to anything.”

aka “I am p~~~ed the state would not support and enable me to screw my ex over financially and materially when we broke up.”

ENTITLED.

Entitlement. Give me stuff.

And she is also lying. She is entitled to whatever she brought into the marriage and if there is joint property she is entitled to her part of the joint property. But I bet she hardly put in anything material/financial to the large degree THE MAN did.

AND, 17 years and you could not simply do a quick civil marriage at some point?!?!?! IF he said NO, you stayed with him anyway. If he said YES you’d be taking him to the cleaners right now and not give two s~~~s about what you were taking from him.

EVER WONDER WHY NO PAPERS RUN STORIES WORRYING ABOUT HOW MEN HANDLE FINANCIAL DISASTER AFTER DIVORCE????? F~~~ing gynocentric bitch hypocrite media. No one gives a s~~~ where the man is going to live, how he’s going to end up, how his emotional state is, if he is suicidal and depressed. F~~~ gynocentric society. I cannot wait for it to be burned to ashes.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22531]

And also cohab men face the 911 call issue just like married guys do. “One call, and that’s all”.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22531]

Crap I couldnt correct my posting anymore. I mis-stated “marriage” when it should have been “cohabitation”.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[PhilandryParticipant 538]

Atton,
you have defined the cicumstance very well and clarified it for me and others I’m sure. Your knowledge of these things is very valuable for providing reality checks in a system gone mad.

KTR,
you are right to the degree that there will be calls for wealth redistribution, but this is a socialist trait rather than communist as there is usually nothing left to redistribute by the time the communists take power.
I got some very ugly looks at a university once when I was looking at a poster put by the students socialist collective calling for redistribution of wealth.
I simply stated (fairly loudly) that redistribution of wealth is always called for by those who have never created any. Strangely, not one of the socialist pimple heads had any comeback, but if looks could kill I’d be dead as mutton.
LOL!

I predicted many years ago the gradual slide toward making any relationship a paying one for the women would come to pass. As time goes by, ANY interaction that regularly occurs between men and women will be monetised in favour of the women. I don’t know exactly how this will occur, but I guarantee it will.

The only avenue of free money available to women is mens labour.

Government will play a large part. Historically they have imposed financial leins on men such as slavery, man taxes, seizure of assets etc.

There is, however, a particularly troubling possibility ahead. Nationalisation of ALL male labour. This could be done with the stroke of a pen and would essentially make all men vassals of the state.

This would also work in very well with the feminazi concepts of labour camps for men. What about the elites? They will be divided from the common ruck of working men on class grounds based around their wealth and power as women still need to dream of husbands of high status.

I hope that before this happens the system will collapse of its own weight.

Being a man is incredible good luck. Do not waste it on the unlucky.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

No marriage.

NO COHABITATION.

No procreation.

Always at her place. NEVER at yours. Don’t even let her know your address if at all possible.

[narrow road travelerParticipant 1680]

Philandry wrote:

Atton,
you have defined the cicumstance very well and clarified it for me and others I’m sure. Your knowledge of these things is very valuable for providing reality checks in a system gone mad.

KTR,
you are right to the degree that there will be calls for wealth redistribution, but this is a socialist trait rather than communist as there is usually nothing left to redistribute by the time the communists take power.
I got some very ugly looks at a university once when I was looking at a poster put by the students socialist collective calling for redistribution of wealth.
I simply stated (fairly loudly) that redistribution of wealth is always called for by those who have never created any. Strangely, not one of the socialist pimple heads had any comeback, but if looks could kill I’d be dead as mutton.
LOL!

I predicted many years ago the gradual slide toward making any relationship a paying one for the women would come to pass. As time goes by, ANY interaction that regularly occurs between men and women will be monetised in favour of the women. I don’t know exactly how this will occur, but I guarantee it will.

The only avenue of free money available to women is mens labour.

Government will play a large part. Historically they have imposed financial leins on men such as slavery, man taxes, seizure of assets etc.

There is, however, a particularly troubling possibility ahead. Nationalisation of ALL male labour. This could be done with the stroke of a pen and would essentially make all men vassals of the state.

This would also work in very well with the feminazi concepts of labour camps for men. What about the elites? They will be divided from the common ruck of working men on class grounds based around their wealth and power as women still need to dream of husbands of high status.

I hope that before this happens the system will collapse of its own weight.

Imbecile tyrants can fantasize about taking my property after murdering me all they want. My #4 shot will send them straight to the pearly gates.

In the history of humanity. Tyrannical idiots fail in the face of righteous indignation. Every time.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

[Author]

Posts