I was entitled to nothing

[SMADParticipant 651]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-42134722

A BBC article discussing potential changes in common law. Wimmenz want more rights if they don’t get married.

So now that marriages are in decline, this is a new tactic? Ugghhhhh.

Marriage?  No thanks, i'm not ready to be THAT miserable.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

This is great.

O agree common law marriage laws are outdated.

The more they change laws against men, the faster SHTF.

BRING IT.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Anonymous 12]

another trap.

Never cohabitate – she can f~~~ you just as much as in marriage.

[AwakenedParticipant 35203]

Just GHOST On THROUGH…..Keep On Walking…. there is NOTHING Left for YOU !!!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[MonkParticipant 17010]

This has been in the pipeline for some time.

The next wave will be that men can be divorce raped at the end of an LTR, even though there was no cohabitation.

All that will be required is evidence of ‘commitment’.

Agitation for this has already begun, although it is relatively low-key at the moment.

Far fetched? An outright ‘man-tax’ has already been tried in Sweden. There also used to be actions for ‘Breach of Promise’.

[roninParticipant 341]

SMAD wrote:

Wimmenz want more rights

I thought what wimminz wanted was more left. Lol.

We are at the dawn of a New Era. We are the Vanguard.-Greg Honda.

[Anonymous 42]

That’s just progressives progressing.

Stay alive, step aside! Give them more independence than they can handle! 100% Independence! Sink, fall, or swim! Stay in it for the WIN!

My indifference has grown stronger with each gynocentric day, and each gynocentric change!

THEY MAKE A MAN’S LIFE A TOXIC WASTE SITE!

^^^^^^And there’s no plans for a supperfund cleanup!

[narrow road travelerParticipant 1680]

Grey man ghost might be an effective counter to this insanity. Keep as little liquid capital in the machine as possible.

The false harassment claims, are just the tip of the iceberg. With a common law marriage expansion definition.

Theoretically, any woman can speed dial 911. File a false claim of relationship with a man. Have a kangaroo court family law show trial.

You’re tried in absentia, found ‘guilty, liable, or whatever legalize term.’ The kangaroo judge sends some papers to your employer, bank manager, title company, or investment broker. Those corporate officers in temporary possession of your liquid assets. Will blindly hand your property over to the kangaroo court.

While under the haze 10+ years ago. I would have thought my previous paragraph was an implausible scenario. Now processing the flood of daily injustice against men. It could happen at any moment for the unprepared.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

ronin wrote:

SMAD wrote:

Wimmenz want more rights

I thought what wimminz wanted was more left. Lol.

Give this men a sexbot, he f~~~ing earned it.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

Anonymous wrote:

another trap.

Never cohabitate – she can f~~~ you just as much as in marriage.

F~~~ed financially of course, they stop sucking and f~~~ing as soon as the ring goes on.

Marriage is failing so they make LTRs like marriage… Hopefully this will mean LTRs decline like crazy as well.

Don’t worry though!, these gals don’t need men!. They’re so strong, independent and have ‘better careers than men’ so surely they won’t need help or cash.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Got to get the money to the women.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[DocParticipant]

Just means men won’t cohabit.
Women got themselves to blame.

The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape, finding oneself in the ranks of the insane. Marcus Aurelius

[BoarParticipant]

What is the mine shaft entitled to after it has been exhausted? What is the field entitled to after the harvest? What is the Starbucks coffee cup entitled to after the last sip of the Pumpkin Spice Latte with Madagascar Cinnamon, Organic Indonesian Nutmeg and Almond Milk has been swilled?

We have the resources to be extracted and this does not entitle us to anything. Not even respect or acknowledgement. Give them NOTHING!

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[Anonymous 42]

Space Cowboy wrote:

Marriage is failing so they make LTRs like marriage… Hopefully this will mean LTRs decline like crazy as well.

Abstinence and self segregation is the only hope for the modern individual man now bylaw segregated and isolated from his natural rights and the blessings of life! You cannot negotiate with this enemy planted in the hearts of modern liberated women! The liberated monster inside them can and will DEVOUR YOU!!!!

narrow road traveler wrote:

While under the haze 10+ years ago. I would have thought my previous paragraph was an implausible scenario. Now processing the flood of daily injustice against men. It could happen at any moment for the unprepared.

It isn’t just one or two impurities in the law, the whole of the law is stinging drunk naive willing participants practicing absolute tyranny!

Feminism did this!

Make no mistake about it!

!!>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<!!

RUN!!!!! RUN!!!!! RUN!!!!!

[Golgotha777Participant 326]

We’re in the unfortunate (or fortunate depending on how you look at it) position of being a generation of martyrs for this social experiment of female civic domination.

Someone has to take the hit, you know? If men don’t reject the state of things as they are, the misery will go on forever.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Common Law = Wealth Redistribution = Communism

Sovereignty above all else.

[Anonymous 0]

I am so triggered by this that I can’t get my thoughts in order and lately have been giving serious consideration to a urban-GALT lifestyle. Blue pill society calls that a LONER.
I call it self protection.

[TwistParticipant]

narrow road traveler wrote:

While under the haze 10+ years ago. I would have thought my previous paragraph was an implausible scenario. Now processing the flood of daily injustice against men. It could happen at any moment for the unprepared.

I’ll never mistake equating laws with justice again.

This was legal:

As was this:

[AttonParticipant]

Mother-of-five Yvonne, who was with her ex-partner 17 years, said she was “shocked to find out” her legal rights when they ended the relationship.

“I was entitled to nothing,” she said.

“I was no longer just dealing with a break-up – but with the fallout of not being legally entitled to share in any of what I thought were our joint assets.”

I am tired of this s~~~ and how it is seen as a given, the concept of joint assets and entitlement are s~~~. They are a complete in anathema to the concept that the workers labor is their own,the concept that slavery is impermissible. The division of assets was constructed as a form of punishment for those found guilty of fault in a divorce. It was rightfully used in these cases as a mechanism to reward damages to a person who was wronged willingly and knowingly by another. In the context of a mutually agreed apron contract of marriage prohibiting such wrong doing.

This does not and should not apply to an informal and undefined relationship. As it is by its nature ambiguous if both parties find the concept of division to be acceptable. In the context of an actual marriage of the past this was understood and subject to an actual agreement. In the context of this common law bulls~~~, there is no right of refusal. No informed consent, no understanding of the parameters of a division of assets if any.
Unlike virtually any other deal or agreement eg a mortgage. One can regularly expect to understand the parameters that and you reserve the right of refusal, until such time as you consent to said deal.

In short if you want to do a business deal your informed consent is required. With common law even your knowledge isn’t necessary. There is no reason for this system to exist and if there must a be division of assets it should be a contract like any other. One that is not subject to change on a whim of a court feeling that it is unfair. One that actually requires all parties understand what they are getting into. The status quo is slavery under the veil of terms like rights, entitlement and protections. If this woman see’s a division to be important she can and should have negotiated that, like every other financial exchange outside of the context of tax and damages. This system is be extended over time to become applicable, to individuals that don’t even live under the same roof. The only way to avoid being abused by all of this is ultimately to go MGTOW. Because women want free s~~~ and they give no f~~~s about the consent or rights of others.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 3]

They’ve been saying this for awhile but nothing has really happened, so it probably won’t actually. The lawmakers know exactly how far they can push and get away with things. Blue pill men like to have zero rights and rush into marriage. Other men think marriage is too s~~~ty to bother with, and just cohabit. Others don’t even do that. If cohabiting becomes the next line, that just moves more men to refuse to cohabit, and more men that have nothing to do with women entirely beyond that.

While it may be a goal at one point to move those lines, they like to do it slowly, mostly onto a new generation and have it accepted that way. I think they’re still a little surprised at the drop in marriage rate. They’re likely waiting for that to stabilize and rise a little bit before drawing more people in.

[Author]

Posts