I Love This Guy!

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Great reference @lowkey.

Also, you know what really burns these two bitches and really hammers it home as they cannot label him? Because he is openly gay! And that gentlemen f~~~s them completely because rarely if ever will a woman take on a gay guy because they’ll get destroyed. FACT!

[OldBillParticipant]

I’ve seen that story before, DeepInThought, and still makes me shake my head.

I’m a keloid healer. Every major scar on my body is a pinkish/reddish lumpy nodule. I’ve got keloids from a broken arm and from abdominal surgery. I’ve got a keloid on one pectoral from where welding slag burned through my clothes. I’ve got keloids on my back, side, and waist from shrapnel.

What I don’t have is the mindless narcissism necessary to demand that other people ignore my scars and call me handsome.

The ignorant c~~~ in that article looks like she had a f~~~ing zipper installed between her groin and sternum. It’s big, puckered, and the suture marks are clearly visible. The surgery team turned her into a f~~~ing canoe as they chased down that uncontrolled bleeding to her ruptured spleen. Remarking on a scar that massive and that noticeable isn’t being cruel. Remarking on that scar that massive and noticeable is merely commenting on reality. Not remarking on a scar that massive and noticeable is delusional and a willful denial of reality.

She’s fat and she has a goddamn zipper running up her torso. She is not “brave”. She is not “beautiful”. She’s just a tubby, deluded, attention whoring c~~~ with a big f~~~ing scar.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

You know why most scientists are men? Because they understand basic principles like correlation vs. causation or equality of opportunity vs. equality of outcome. If I were a woman who wanted to become a scientist, I’d be ashamed to have this Dr. Emily Grossman represent me on live, national television and have such a deficit in understanding about ANYTHING scientific. She had to change the premise of her argument 2-3 times throughout just to be able to continue the mental gymnastics at work here! She didn’t disprove a thing Milo said; that’s the kind of person feminism wants to idolize? Pathetic. She’s either intentionally playing dumb and thereby being dishonest or she’s unintentionally being dumb in which case, she has no place in science not based on her gender, but based on her inability to grasp basic principles used in science all of the time.

QuietMan wrote:

What kills me is the premise that someone can give you confidence. This woman is talking about instilling confidence in young girls. She says she does that. That’s BS.

You can’t give anyone confidence. Confidence is earned. In fact, I’d argue that the more people “give” you confidence, the less confidence you’ll have.

Confidence is born by fighting for it. By rising up above those who would hold you back and discredit your ideas. Confidence is internal. It can’t be fostered by external validation. You have to have an internal loci of control. Confidence is a form of mental independence not dependent upon validation from others.

Confident people stand on their own two feet. People who lack confidence need others to stand up for them.

Exactly. The long and short of the video is that Grossman wants men to be responsible for whether or not women become involved in the STEM fields, but the decision is theirs alone.

By the by, the fat shaming video with Milo makes me laugh. They’ve investigated the whole “healthy overweight” myth and, guess what? IT’S A MYTH.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

@oldbill.

Actually I couldn’t care less about the scar what made me laugh was in the video she talked about how she worked as a model (likening herself to a Victoria Secrets Angel) and that she UNDERSTOOD the fashion industry. Firstly the pic of her just shows she is delusional and the fact she knows sweet FA about the fashion industry. Total ignorance and denial.

Oh and let’s not forget how the presenter introduced him “Writer, Broadcaster and Mischief Maker…” She should have lost her job right there and then for discrimination and slander!

[rorickParticipant 682]

Wow she also called the debate as “mysogynistic backlash” .. And here’s his reply

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/06/11/why-do-feminists-cook-up-stories-about-misogyny-when-they-lose-debates/

[numbCruncherParticipant 772]

Sorry, the misogynistic backlash was me.

I told her she looks much hotter when she’s angry.

Check out the photos of her rolling her eyes.

<<Shudders>>

You say "love is a temple, love the higher law" ...You ask me to enter, but then you make me crawl. And I can't be holding on to what you got, when all you got is hurt

[CodeBleuParticipant 161]

DeepInThought wrote:

@ 4:40 on timeline BOOM…shame tactic & victim card!

Fat mannequins aren’t very practical anyway. They use more material to produce, as well as the clothes to hang them on. Nobody wants to see them when they’re window shopping. If I wanted to see a tent, I’d go to Gander Mountain. He’s just echoing the sentiments of rational thinkers everywhere. We aren’t attracted to fat. We are attracted to fit. Too f~~~ing bad! No matter how much these “lesbianic” Betty Page haircut having, tatted up, fat dykes want accommodations made for them, it still doesn’t mean they belong in certain environments. No amount of protests, slut-walks, monkeying with politics that these feminists do is ever going to change what we feel in our logical brains.

[Author]

Posts