I Love This Guy!

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Logic, maturity and confidence!

[CasperParticipant 66]

She’s mad!

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

You know why she’s p~~~ed? This dude just intellectually bent her over, screwed her silly and she knows it.

I love how she openly admits her own misandrist tendencies by saying she’s all about helping female students with self-confidence and self belief and showing very little concern with treating men the same way, because there are more men in STEM subjects than women. So by default you’re not giving the men the same emotional advantage via support as the women, sexist.

So not only does she reveal feminism to be completely about female superiority, but she indirectly and openly admits to being sexist.

No wonder they scream rape culture, when they try to make any points they actually back themselves into a corner.

Sorry miss feminist, logic has been weighed, you’re a sexist pig.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

@ 4:40 on timeline BOOM…shame tactic & victim card!

[RoyDalParticipant]

I should not have been surprised that a university got rid of a Nobel Prize winner — and his wife — because feminists were sending it twitter tweets. After all these years of successful feminist hate campaigns, one more egregious incident should not have surprised me.

You know what I want for Christmas? One of those shirts with scanty clad girls on it, a shirt just like the one that almost got that astrophysicist fired.
Better yet, a shirt with topless girls waving Confederate flags and posing in front of racing cars!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[rorickParticipant 682]

Wait! did I hear she saying at first “who would like to start” then says “doctor” …f~~~ isn’t that sexist .. say if a male reporter did the same thing giving the first opportunity to the guy then he would have been called a chauvinist pig and asked to apologies or even resign ..

If the debate continued for another ten minutes she would have cried!

[RedDawnParticipant 1391]

The irony is that women are woman’s biggest enemy, while mangina’s and white knights are men’s biggest enemy. If women were able to remove feminists from power and chivalry wasn’t the norm for men then there would be greater equality. Though equality really is an idealistic notion, much like communism which has already been proven not to work, with it’s failures still evident today in North Korea and Russia.

Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

[UntamedParticipant]

He’s definitely right. Women nowadays are advantaged, encouraged, supported and cheered to go better themselves. That there are more women entering and leaving colleges with degrees is a fact. That most of them don’t chose Sciences isn’t because of some imagined biased, he’s right on that too. Women just aren’t interested in the Sciences as much as men, that’s a fact. Boys dream about going to mars, girls are into fluffy stuff for the most part.
He’s also right when he said that 50 or 60 years ago women were disadvantaged and that isn’t true any more.
So what we have is a bunch of deluded, hating BluePiller Femstappo c~~~s attacking, belittling and destroying an entire segment of society using an argument that hasn’t been valid for at least 40 years.
I think the balance has tipped on their side far too long.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[prmai49Participant 52]

Could anyone make sense of when she said that when women identify as female on a test, they lack confidence or do worse? How could this even be studied for? Like do they take the same/similar tests and have women mark themselves as men, sounds completely ridiculous and sounds like a scape goat for women just having s~~~ty confidence period.

[olderwiserParticipant 65]

What should’ve happened is that the guy should’ve said that STEM subjects involve a lot of logic / reasoning and an ability to detach from your emotions so that facts can be researched and looked into deeply without emotions getting involved which serve no purpose in those subjects during the period of which they are being studied, sure they are needed for day to day life, motivations and other daily endeavors but in the (especially science subjects) classroom if you do not have the ability to listen to a remark without getting emotional, be it you are a man or a woman, you should reconsider what you are about to study or take a gap year and work on your ability to have more emotional self-control and introspective character when any kind of criticism is pointed your way. Maybe STEM subjects aren’t for everyone (mainly females & emotional maginas). BOOM!

Life consists of two days, one for you one against you. So when it's for you don't be proud or reckless, and when it's against you be patient, for both days are test for you.

[QuietManParticipant 26]

What kills me is the premise that someone can give you confidence. This woman is talking about instilling confidence in young girls. She says she does that. That’s BS.

You can’t give anyone confidence. Confidence is earned. In fact, I’d argue that the more people “give” you confidence, the less confidence you’ll have.

Confidence is born by fighting for it. By rising up above those who would hold you back and discredit your ideas. Confidence is internal. It can’t be fostered by external validation. You have to have an internal loci of control. Confidence is a form of mental independence not dependent upon validation from others.

Confident people stand on their own two feet. People who lack confidence need others to stand up for them.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

I can see the butthurt in her face. And I felt pretty sorry for Tim Hunt after what happened. He ended up being proven right.

[numbCruncherParticipant 772]

You say "love is a temple, love the higher law" ...You ask me to enter, but then you make me crawl. And I can't be holding on to what you got, when all you got is hurt

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

One of those shirts with scanty clad girls on it, a shirt just like the one that almost got that astrophysicist fired.

I have this t shirt that has a black and white photo of a naked model. But over her eyes, nose, amd other areas are blacked out with bone/skull appearance. Kind of hard to describe.

I have NEVER gotten so many compliments from girls on a shirt before. It was uncanny. I like the shirt because it evokes this emotion that women are toxicly dangerous. Apparently women deep down know this. I swear almost everytime I wear it girls say they like it. I bet they dont even know why though lol.

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

DeepInThought wrote:

Logic, maturity and confidence!
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/VCaEO6ue_io?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Ya, this is ridiculous. Someone posted this video a while back. The female dr ends up, unkowingly, making a strong case that women dont belong in science.
Her entire position is that there needs to be just as many women as men in science. Who gives a f~~~? Only some PC idiot would hold such an immature idealistic notion.

Her most ridiculous claim was women lose confidence when they write their name at the top of a test, because it reminds them they are female

How insane is that? What, did they forget they were girls? They are so delicate they cant handle writing their name?

-women are just as capable of being scientists.
– we need special treatment of women in science fields.

Oh contrar! Cry me a f~~~ing river you circular reasoning t~~~

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

QuietMan wrote:

What kills me is the premise that someone can give you confidence. This woman is talking about instilling confidence in young girls. She says she does that. That’s BS.
You can’t give anyone confidence. Confidence is earned. In fact, I’d argue that the more people “give” you confidence, the less confidence you’ll have.
Confidence is born by fighting for it. By rising up above those who would hold you back and discredit your ideas. Confidence is internal. It can’t be fostered by external validation. You have to have an internal loci of control. Confidence is a form of mental independence not dependent upon validation from others.
Confident people stand on their own two feet. People who lack confidence need others to stand up for them.

This is such great insight on the topic and so true.

Resident cynic.

[FrankOneParticipant 1435]

I don’t think it’s exactly what you’re describing, though….

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

FrankOne wrote:

I don’t think it’s exactly what you’re describing, though….

Ha! No – its much less morbid and much more of a rhetro 80s black and white model pic. I actually got it at a department store. It exudes this dichotomy of: women are sexy/beautiful, but dangerous/deadly.

I was just shocked how almost everytime I wore it girls would compliment it. My buddies wife complimented it so I asked her why, explaining to her what I just told you. She said – “I guess were attracted to the morbid”. Such a head trip, these girls.

Resident cynic.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/real-life/391709/Lingerie-shoot-exposed-scar-internet-trolls

[LowKeyParticipant 702]

Pause it @2:24 read the headline below

Quite ironic they’re discussing about logics and such when clearly in the headline below, a woman JUST made an ILLOGICAL choice.

Don't let defeat, defeat you; Let defeat be your greatest teacher.

[Author]

Posts