I love how women think they contribute to man's "success"

[KeymasterKeymaster]

33wolfman wrote:

If you think about in a way that meme can be true, the most successful men choose NOT to have a woman in his life, or if they do it’s the mans choice on his terms.

Yes it’s very cleverly worded don’t you think?

“A man’s success has a lot to do with the kind of women he chooses to have in his life”

But apparently not.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/homeless-billionaire-nicolas-berggruen-curious-783353

This is what would happen if that MGTOW billionaire was stupid enough to let a woman into his life:

http://www.businessinsider.com/r-harold-hamm-offers-975-million-divorce-check-ex-wife-rejects-it-2015-1

•••••••

So….

“A man’s success has a lot to do with the kind of women he chooses to have in his life!!!!”

“STOP IT NOW. Nobody’s buying your s~~~ sandwich anymore. It makes you look arrogant and stupid. He will be more successful without you. Guaranteed.”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

More like detriment.

 

 

 

 

How come I have more disposable income now that I’m single? I did secret jobs and hid money my entire marriage. To gamble and get whores? No. To buy comics and hockey equipment.

Women have the amazing ability to suck away money wherever it is for the act of doing nothing. Marriage, the sexual harassment fiasco at my job…..

Fuck this planet.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Lone Sea Voyager wrote:

C~~~: My husband (Womanspeak for idiot)

C~~~: Behind every successful man (Womanspeak for ATM machine)

 

Ok. When we make the thread of the Womanspeak universal translator, we need this! Why haven’t we done that yet?

 

Excellent post all around sir.

Fuck this planet.

[Anonymous 42]

(speed bump)

Good call Qcummer! Great job Keymaster! These speed bumps are getting easier to flatten with you guys turning them to s~~~ before they ruin the thread. I really appreciate it, THANK YOU!   

P.S. Look at the clothing section in any major department store; 90 sq. ft. of female clothing for every 10 sq. ft. of male clothing. An old lady died in my area, when they took out all her clothing for charity, most of it still had the price tags and was never worn, It was enough to fill a trailer, I’m guessing about 40 to 50 THOUSAND DOLLARS WORTH!

They live for today, and have lots of cats tomorrow…

[Cap285Participant 6007]

You have made a mistake. A mistake that will haunt you. Your little he man woman haters club will be dealt with accordingly. See you on the 404 page.

Oh no! Prepare for the coming of feminist/PC Internet police! Put your head between your legs and kiss your ass goodbye!

Hear that boys? Keeping your money for yourself will haunt you the rest of your life. I’d love to hear her explain how that works. Typical feminist/t~~~ antics. F~~~ free speech. Silence those who disagree with you.

F~~~ing MGTOW bitches!

Fuck this planet.

[Anonymous 42]

Cap285 wrote:

F~~~ing MGTOW bitches!

Hey Cap, bitches can’t MGTOW, unless you meant dicking bitches by a MGTOW???

[GrumpyParticipant]

Very Interesting (ala Artie Shaw)

In my case, I will admit to a bit of truth to this assumption in an abstract sort of way. Technically, my success comes from rebuilding my life repeatedly after each and every woman I had “behind/beside” me, got left behind. Had they not have been in my life, I would not have had to make the effort to rebuild. I am better off now than I was during and immediately after them,  I became quite proficient at repeatedly rebuilding my finances, ego I am successful. Does that count?

Somehow, a woman would take that as a compliment

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Mana KnightParticipant 333]

On the subject of the recently punted c~~~ – I have said it before and I will say it again – Show me a female hacker who has done anything?
Anyone who has shut down or hacked the likes of Sony, The Pentagon, etc have been men.

They would have to employ a man to have any hope of actually taking down some men. Even then I doubt it.

[Anonymous 42]

Mana Knight wrote:

On the subject of the recently punted c~~~ – I have said it before and I will say it again – Show me a female hacker who has done anything? Anyone who has shut down or hacked the likes of Sony, The Pentagon, etc have been men. They would have to employ a man to have any hope of actually taking down some men. Even then I doubt it.

The reason they get into government sites is because women chose the passwords, choices like  “pentagon” for the pentagon, stupid s~~~ like that. I’m sure KeyMasters passwords are a 256 bit encryption that leads to a f~~~ you box!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Last night, the member “random precision” (now deleted and displaying as “anonymous” in this thread) first threatened twice and then attempted to take down our site. Even if she employed a man, that man failed. And we suffered no loss.

It’s clear who the hateful ones are, isn’t it. We’ve never tried to take down a feminist site.
Why bother? it’s too easy to take a feminist down with a few well chosen words.

That’s what they hate: when you kill’em with kindness.

We sent her a friendly email but haven’t heard back. Seems the hateful little c~~~roach has scattered.

So… is allowing women REALLY going to contribute to a man’s success?
Allow her anywhere near you, and she will only want to bring you down.

Make sure you never let her. MAKE SURE.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Why bother hating us??? We don’t hate each other, why do they? Is it something we said????? Something we thought?

Or is it that we’re collectively pulling that diamond off their fingers and trading it for a brand new remote control airplane, with lots of nitro to fly it!

Did we cancel her fancy restaurant meals for the next 25 years? That must be it! No food for the hog and you get the tusks!

[EscapedMentalPatientParticipant 1489]

Anonymous wrote:

Why bother hating us??? We don’t hate each other, why do they? Is it something we said????? Something we thought?

It’s actually part and parcel of this very thread, my friend.  How fitting.  Success.  They haven’t an inkling of the concept, particularly when it is success brought on by one’s own hard work, diligence and calculated fortitude.

Someone like this would far rather now spend their time (although I’d be very surprised if the threat wasn’t empty and devoid, like their hearts and souls) finding a way to dismantle the joy and success of another, rather than actually put some time on the books in creating their own happiness.

This “404 Threat” is living, breathing proof of a woman “contributing to a man’s success”.  They absolutely can’t.  They are only capable of attempting to sabotage it in the pursuit of nurturing and continuing to hide their own insecurities and shortcomings.

[Anonymous 42]

EscapedMentalPatient wrote:

This “404 Threat” is living, breathing proof of a woman “contributing to a man’s success”.

Try an 86 threat on me and she’ll be wearing .38 hole between her eyes! (Mega Dot) Followed by having the whole mess dissolved in a 55 gallon drum of H2SO4, then trickled downstream during a good rain!

What happens when you f~~~ with with a man that’s already been really f~~~ed? Nobody knows, they’ve never been seen again!

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

As trite as this bumper sticker level meme seems to be and as easy as it is to use as target practice for reality bullets, I don’t think it should be dismissed as something inconsequential and harmless.  Before continuing here, I’ll agree with the rest of the sentiment here that the meme is false.  But consider the timing at which memes like this have begun to appear in the overall scheme of things and it begins to look a little more ominous.  Let me explain…

Notice that the meme does not refer to a “wife” behind every successful man?  It only refers to a “woman”.  The relationship she has to him is not even defined…  I’ll get back to this.

40 or 50 years ago, you didn’t see sentiments like this.  What we saw back in that time from feminists of the day were that women had not accomplished all these measures of success because men were unfairly keeping them down by some form of cheating in the struggle to achieve success.  The message being thrown at me by feminism 30-40 years ago when I was a teenager was that men were more successful than women because men had cheated somehow to get some unfair advantage that women did not have.

Back in that time, before divorce was so freely available as it is today, in order for a woman to benefit from a man’s success, she had to actually make the effort of being a worthwhile companion to him.  A man might still provide resources and other benefits of his success in the context of a relationship, but he would have some expectations about what would be provided to him in return within that relationship.

Many women unwilling to make the effort to be a worthwhile spouse bought into that narrative that they would be as successful as any man if those unfair advantages that men had could be neutralized.  A successful effort was launched to take them from men.  But it was not an effort to take them from men and eliminate them.  It was an effort to take them from men and give them to women, and it was successful.  Fast forward several decades and we see women with all kinds of advantages in law and education and in the economy that men never even had.

Yet, there are still no female engineered moon landings, no female cures to diseases, no female break-throughs in technology or medicine changing the world.  It’s starting to get a little embarrassing how little has been achieved by women given all the resources and social adjustments that were made to provide advantages to women to allow them all the successes that men had supposedly been unfairly keeping from them.  What’s been learned by a very few women, and what will require many more years for the average woman to realize (if she ever does) is that all that success that men had for all those eons… did not come from unfair advantages.

It came from the willingness and ability to make enormous sacrifices of time and effort and sweat, willingness to give up time with family and time spent with children, willingness to put one’s own personal safety at risk when necessary, willingness to make enormous efforts in order to get a job done whose result would be bigger than any individual who had a part in creating it, willingness and ability to be an unnamed, unrecognized part of an enormous team of other men in order to get something done that could not be done by any one of them working alone.

What woman can anyone find who has EVER been willing to do these things to achieve anything…?

What is being learned is that success always had a price… that women were never aware of because men always paid it and never mentioned it to them, or demanded much in the way of special recognition for paying it.  Even with all the unearned perks and advantages being heaped upon women today, they still can’t be as successful as men have been without paying that price.  The price is higher than most women are willing to pay.

So now, after all that time and effort has been spent trying to get those same opportunities that men had, women have realized that those opportunities for success are really just opportunities to work and sweat and suffer for success.  And that’s all they ever were…  Women are finding that they are not willing to make the sacrifices for success, and they are not willing to be worthy companions for a successful man to share the benefits of his success.

Add to this that as the opportunity to work to succeed at all has been taken from men and handed to women, there has emerged a very notable shrinking in the number of those successful men who might have some benefits of success to share with a woman.  (Where have all the ‘good’ men gone?).  Now, not only have they learned that the success they wanted for themselves has a higher price than they are willing to pay, they are simultaneously learning that they have done enormous damage to that other half of the population who, in another time, would have paid that price for them and shared the benefits of that success with them.

Now, it’s every man/woman for themselves.

The price of success is as high as it ever was, but the population of men allowed to be successful is shrinking to a smaller number than it’s ever been.  Among those men who have paid that price for success, there is a growing fraction of them who are not sharing it.

That’s us.  That’s MGTOW.

So, in the midst of this feminist movement that the average woman bought into, she is finding that success of her own has a price she is not willing to pay, she’s being told that being a companion worthy of a successful man sharing those benefits with her is actually beneath her, she is finding that there are fewer and fewer men able to achieve success, and among those men there is this rising movement of men who are unwilling to share the benefits of it with her…  What are her options now?

If she’s unwilling to earn it, and I’m unwilling to share it with her, the most convenient third option is to take it from me.  Taking it by force is too much work, but if she can convince me that I owe it to her (because I could not have achieved it without her), then she can demand that government or some other force of social justice war-monger take it for her from me and give it to her.

For many years, this has been done very successfully in divorce courts.  And I’ve noted since I was a teenager that marriage is not forever… it’s just a formality that women have to go through to be in a position to get a divorce and take from you forever.

But in the last 10 years or so, men are less and less willing to get married in the first place.

And now, finally, at this point, we start to see the arrival of memes that indicate that a man cannot be successful without a woman… while failing to even define the relationship with that woman…

If I have not connected the dots clearly enough yet:

They want what you have.  They are unwilling to work it.  They are unwilling to deserve it being shared with them.  And the usual method of taking it from you in a divorce doesn’t work anymore because you aren’t willing to marry them.  Now, you owe it to them based on a non-marriage relationship with them that is not even defined…

Pay attention here guys.  They’d like you to believe you owe it to them, but they’ll settle for just continuing to beat this drum until the government believes it…

It’s not just a harmless meme.  Not for long anyway…

 

 

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Anonymous 42]

Bravo BP <clap clap clap> You’re a lyrical arrow released form the MGTOW X bow! That one went straight through the target! Great shot!

[EscapedMentalPatientParticipant 1489]

@brainpilot

That was really an excellent read, BP.  Enjoyed the many pearls of wisdom that post had to offer.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

: “Behind every successful man there’s a woman.”
: “And the further behind he leaves her, the more successful he becomes.”

Keymaster wrote:

Yes it’s very cleverly worded don’t you think?

“A man’s success has a lot to do with the kind of women he chooses to have in his life”

The corollary is much more accurate:

“A man’s FAILURE has a lot to do with the kind of women he chooses to have in his life.”

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Fixed.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Mana KnightParticipant 333]

Imagine the s~~~-storm of posting that on FB.

Tempted.

😀

So she actually tried @keymaster? Seriously, what is their problem! We try and leave and let them get on with it (remember, they need us like a fish needs blah blah blah) so what is the problem we have chosen to up and become a “he-man club”.
Why follow us here!

This is good for them! We are useless and oppressive, right? Women can run it better without us, right? Don’t they have nazis/world hunger/racism to stop? All of these can be stopped by feminism and shouting loudly, I know this to be the truth because they said so.

And on the subject of Feminism and Nazis, by trying to silence a voice that speaks out against them? Is there not some weird 3rd Reich tone to that?

They are like children, they really are. We have walked away after being fed up with the rules of the game and made our own game, but now they want to follow on and play with us still!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Mana Knight wrote:

Imagine the s~~~-storm of posting that on FB.

Oh I encourage you to do more than just “imagine” it.

Share that s~~~ immediately. Wherever you see the meme… post it right underneath it.
(Here is a link if you would rather that than the picture: /poster/success/)

“Success” WITH a woman:
http://www.businessinsider.com/r-harold-hamm-offers-975-million-divorce-check-ex-wife-rejects-it-2015-1

“Success” withOUT one.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/homeless-billionaire-nicolas-berggruen-curious-783353

Just because women are bad at math, doesn’t mean they are good at NOT math.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Author]

Posts