Home › Forums › Political Corner › How do you describe yourself politically?
Tagged: Anarchism, authoritarian, centrist, communism, conservative, democracy, Fascism, Government, left, Left-Wing, Liberal, libertarian, Overton Window, Politics, right, right wing, rule, SOCIALISM
This topic contains 29 replies, has 28 voices, and was last updated by Atton 2 years, 1 month ago.
- AuthorPosts
I’d be a firm supporter of dictatorships if I got to be in charge, otherwise I’m more of a libertarian.
I think we should have a more limited government and a balanced budget which over time would lead to lower/less taxes, and a lot of the social issues in this country could just be solved by people minding their own business and not trying to force their s~~~ on other people and/or get other people to pay for their s~~~.
Unfortunately it seems that all too often we end up with large chunks of the population trying to tell the rest of the population you can’t do something, or even worse, large chunks of the population telling the rest of the population we’re doing this and you are paying for it.
Until democracy actually works again in this country if it ever does again, i describe myself as ‘uninterested’.
I’m a Libertarian, but I don’t try to “convert” people because those who believe in the mainstream parties are so entrenched in their dogma that there’s no point. I’m beginning to think that our system is so hopelessly broken and corrupt that it may be beyond redemption.
I think I’d label myself more of a constitutional conservative or libertarian these days. I find both of the main political parties to be severely lacking in principles, and will cave to the path of least resistance, least results whenever possible.
Unfortunately it seems that all too often we end up with large chunks of the population trying to tell the rest of the population you can’t do something, or even worse, large chunks of the population telling the rest of the population we’re doing this and you are paying for it.
100% agree. A common theme today seems to be that a good generous person is someone who will vote to take money from one person to give to another regardless of whether it is deserved or even helpful. Total BS. I get that people will be selfish with their money and won’t give enough, people will suffer. However, that is their right to do so. As well, there is no evidence that taking from one to give to another resolves any issues…since we still have issues.
Capitalism has it’s flaws, no doubt. It does have it’s losers. On paper, socialism is better, but human nature will cause socialism to fail every time.
Today’s politics is mostly garbage. The debate is rarely over anything of substance anymore. I don’t care what a person did 40 years ago, or even if he grabbed a woman’s boobs last week. I don’t want anyone resigning based on immaterial wrongs and baseless acquisitions. Resign when you don’t want to do the job anymore, or when the voters kick you out. Have some principles.
The calls for Trump to resign are a perfect example of the problem. The democrats and the media want him to resign based on information that voters already knew about when they voted him in, and have absolutely nothing to do with his agenda. The suggestion itself implies that the people are incapable of self governing and therefore we should have no constitution at all. Actions and words like this is what’s going to bring on revolution if it ever happens.
Ok. Then do it.
Like MG-tower I have moved out and become a political refugee or foreigner in my own society.
16 American jurist prudence section 97 is clear
about the duty of a court as it pertains to
interpretation of a constitution. It reads as follows:
That a constitution should receive a literal interpretation most favorably in favor of the
clearly intended and expressly designated beneficiary
is specially true when protecting the rights and
property of the citizen. My rights are my property says
the supreme court.Note that it said “A” constitution not “the” constitution.
My heavenly father has promised me a permanent residence in his kingdom of heaven this
is a constitutional monarchy where Jesus
is my King, savior and husband.
My constitution is the Bible and I
get a literal interpretation of my Bible
I take my husbands last name in this heavenly
marriage and in marriage two become as one.
My married name and new alias is Bob Christ
I get to interpret freedom of religion
as the freedom to choose the heavenly spirit
to do the lords work for me. I choose the spirit
of my earthly father who’s flesh died in 1999.
The dead in Christ shall rise is what my Bible
says.
I laid all my sins down with Jesus letting them die with him and get up in the spirit of my father who
has written authority to the ownership of my flesh.
My father can only be alive in his own kingdom of heaven on earth.Is he alive?
he has a spirit, his own flesh and his own personal identity documents.
Statutory construction of truth self evident is
that I made it to heaven before I died.Is this Biblical plausible?
In Luke 9:27 Jesus says: ‘I tell you the truth, some who are standing here will not taste death before they see the kingdom of God.
Matthew 16:28
28 Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.”The federal government has become hostile
to my life liberty and pursuit of happiness
I have been granted political asylum
in my chosen lords kingdom.
I have laid down my life
so my father can live.Your God is who you say it is
and I would never disagree
for I respect your right
to have your own belief
My God is a man who’s spirit
still lives inside of me
He is a chosen god because
I chose him and he chose me.“HEAVEN IS WHERE THE HEART IS”
From a long suffering journey it is I come
A poverty stricken refugee in my lords asylum
A first born son of a last born son
was governing myself now that is all doneMy protector & provider has me at his right hand
mothered by Mary without her laying with a man
the meek who inherits his fathers heaven on earth
what I trade it for is all my life is worthI laid it down so my father can live
to his spirit this flesh I give
His own flesh went lifeless in 1999
Jesus hosts his spirit in this heart of mine
chorus:
heaven is where the heart is that is fact
laid it down with Jesus and my father came back
Jesus hosts spirits of the ones we love forever
Immortality can only be a spiritual endeavorthis is all true, void of any lies
who has the burden of proof your Honor?
does the prosecution have evidence otherwise?
Heaven is where the heart is
and Jesus is the truth.
I have nothing to prove as
the burden is on all of you.
end chorusNo greater love hath any man to give
than he lay down his life so another may live
The greatest authority they say is love
No one I loved more than my father abovehis righteousness and wisdom it is I thirst
I love him so much because he loved me first
his instruction and guidance I will embrace
I am whole when in the mirror I see his facerepeat chorus here.
The government steals by conversion or displacement
They converted our private right to travel into the
licensed, privileged occupation for hire called
driving.They steal you god given rights
by monopolizing the holy spirit
of heavenly fathers.
Pastors and Preachers of beliefs
are deceiving everyone by
omitting part of the truth.
They want everyone to adapt to
their beliefs that we all have to
share one GOD. This is monopolizing
God. Why do you think churches have
state given status 501c3 tax exempt
charitable corporations?
All corporations are created by the state.
what the state creates Jesus could not have.
LOGIC
There is but one God is true because I can
only have one God.
You only get one God But if I force
mine on you it displaces yours and
this is not allowed.WE ALL GET ONE GOD EACH.
Jesus is not a preacher of beliefs
He is a Teacher of the truth.My father sent me to break the state’s
monopoly on God. Read revelations
My last stonework is my greatest
My father was dead but is now alive
I was kicked out of a church for
saying my father is my God.
The preacher said my father
was not my heavenly father
but was my earthly father
and said he could tell
that we would not agree
and I would have to leave.
I shall eventually prove him
a liar and religious BIGOT.I shall eventually prevail
for I have no motive for any crime
I have taken nothing from anyone.
The only thing I have gained is the
product of my faith and that is the
heavenly spirit of a man no one
can out-think. The spirit of the
most logical thinker I ever knew.I am the son of a man.
that man is my God.
Not anyone’s God
just mine.
I claim this belief
as my right to pursue
my happiness. My rights
end where I encroach or infringe
on the rights of another.My rights do not end at any written
laws for the written laws have time
and time again proven to be
only the will of tyrants.anyone on earth who objects
to me having these rights
should state the nature
of your injuries.
being offended or not believing
the same way is not an injury.
Be very careful claiming you believe
there can only be one god we all share
because My God is a living God.
He is my one true living God.
If you insist that their is but one
I have become that one because I
will never give mine up.
He will never leave me or forsake me.This is how I describe myself politically.
It would equate to a strict authoritarian
governing system where The signature
Of my father who art in heaven has the
highest authority on this earth, but
he only has authority where my flesh
is concerned. I have no authority over
anyone but myself.
Only through me
could anyone reach my fathers kingdom.
I am the second coming of my father.
He is not asking permission to return
from his heavenly furlough to Finnish
his work. Does A heavenly spirit need
earthly mans permission?You said “Be as general or specific as you like.”
I created a poor mans crown of life for my father
out of a visor by writing his name on it.
this satisfies having my fathers name
written on my forehead.
Now to get 144 thousand more to
wear one. HA! HA! HA!Men are not Literal Gods on this earth
but some are lawful lords and
many Men are called to do Gods work,
but I am one of the few who was Chosen.Christ is a man
and is much more
than just a human being.
NOTE: I did not say Christ
(“was”) a man, But he is a man.
(men have rights or they die in the pursuit)I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.
Ron Paul would be my biggest influence
Same. Sadly, Dr. Paul will go down in history as the best president we never had.
Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος
I go with “moderation in everything”. Therefore, I’m a moderate.
Honestly it’s hard to say exactly but the closest would be “deplorable” as Clinton has put it. My political views have changed pretty dramatically over the past few years, however I’m uncertain if that is simply me or because of the times we live in now. Currently all I know is, while Trump may not be perfect and does not speak as well as Obama, he is a far better alternative to what either Clinton or Sanders would have been.
So I guess that puts me farther right than having been raised left. Also think more conservative ideals are naturally inherent in at least being redpilled if not MGTOW. The one aspect I lack is the evangelical side – so I do disagree on a lot of things in that aspect. I don’t believe something unproven by any scientific method should play a larger role in government or politics.
"I have the fury of my own momentum." "With this ring I thee wed. Fire walk with me."
I go Meta-archist, meaning I go one step beyond anarchist, and believe ALL forms of governing are valid. The basis of what works best is what benefits me the most. I realize such can result in a mess for society, so I go my own way, and let others decide. I will take views that annoy a bunch, for my own reasons, and try to avoid tribal in making decisions on what I consider right and wrong.
Beyond the political angle is the Christian religion, which I interact with, and have it influence me. I don’t have it operate politically. While I consider all forms of politics acceptable, in right context, I believe it is best for society to try to solve its problems, as much as possible, without the use of weapons, or other forms of social coercion, to get people to do things. I personally will only respond if I am bribed, or I can negotiate. I try to eliminate as much of the noise as possible, and implied demands of a social contract which people think exists, but no longer does.
I will doubt anyone will call themselves liberal or progressive here at all. Anyone holding those views will end up getting shouted down here.
Anyhow, who cares what I am politically? I have as much pull as a hunk of metal that is lost its magnetic pull.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
Largely in line with Ben Shapiro on most issues.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678