Houston man must pay child support for kid that's not his

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

It’s actually amazing that male offspring don’t have to pay their mothers some form of f~~~ing male-child-alimony.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[MonkParticipant 16995]

It all stems from his initial mistake.

‘Girlfriend’.

Stay away from them. Completely.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Where’s the f~~~ing Chad. Women never forget their Chads. Why did they not interrogate her for his name and make him pay? She knows who the real father is.

Because Cornejo is an idiot who didn’t sue her for the false accusation: it has been proved that she lied, but now he must sue her.

Dashing Young Dissident wrote:

This makes my f~~~ing blood boil.

For so little?
There are worse things

A firefighter who donated sperm to a lesbian couple said yesterday that he was being made to pay child support for their son and daughter, in a case believed to be the first of its kind in Britain.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2007/dec/04/gayrights.immigrationpolicy

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[PuniShredderParticipant 2268]

Guilty until proven innocent but since he didn’t fight their BS claim he f~~~ed??? Still think this is “land of the free” I’d go on a killing spree LONG before this c~~~, he lawyer and the judge extorted me.

Be professional be polite but always have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

PuniShredder wrote:

Guilty until proven innocent but since he didn’t fight their BS claim he f~~~ed??? Still think this is “land of the free” I’d go on a killing spree LONG before this c~~~, he lawyer and the judge extorted me.

In this case the judge isn’t unfair: woman allged that Cornejo was the father, Cornejo didn’t oppose, didn’t stand for his rights, and then paid for years.
Even now Cornejo is whining without suing her for her false claim.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[~BSParticipant 3266]

pretty f~~~ed up that since he didn’t protest initially, he’s now held liable for the entire enchilada.

Say you sold your house, a property tax payment came due after you sold it, you ended up paying for it, but was like “f~~~ it” whatever.. I aint going bother challenging it, water under the bridge. Then 18 years later, the state comes back and says that you owe 18 years of porperty taxes on a property that’s not yours because you didn’t fight that payment. This is despite documentation and irrefutable proof showing that you sold the property 18 years ago.

Does that even make sense? Is this not the same f~~~ing thing?

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

In this case the judge isn’t unfair: woman allged that Cornejo was the father, Cornejo didn’t oppose, didn’t stand for his rights, and then paid for years.

It’s not that simple. Cornejo claims didn’t know he’d been named as the father and therefore couldn’t oppose the claim. The state cannot prove a subpoena was ever served him and, while some child support was garnished from his wages years ago, that stopped at some unknown time. The on again/off again child support garnishment is perhaps the oddest part of the case.

Here the US, state governments chase deadbeat dads to the grave and do so with federal help. If Cornejo had been ordered to pay child support, why did Texas somehow start and then stop garnishing money from his paycheck? It should have been deducted automatically.

As to why Cornejo didn’t notice the garnishment first being applied and then being removed way back then, the $65,000 amount sounds like a lot but when you spread it out over 16 years it comes to less then 80 bucks a week. If he were working a job with varying hours, overtime, and all the rest, he could easily missed it. Most people I know barely look at their pay stubs beyond the bottom line dollar amount.

This case is very important because of what Cornejo’s lawyer is quoted as saying: “They say he should have fought back then, and he failed to do so, but how can you fight something you don’t know anything about?” Why is that important? Because the paternity notification procedures followed by the states are cynically and deliberately crafted to prevent men from even contesting paternity.

When some c~~~ slaps some poor schmuck’s name and alleged address on a birth certificate at the hospital, the clock starts immediately running for what is a very short period of time. Most of the time, “notification” is a piece of mail sent to whatever address the mother made up. Whether or not the “father” lives and whether or not the address even exists is of no consequence. The man being named on the birth certificate is considered “notified” as soon as the stamp is licked. The state can claim he was “notified” and then argue he didn’t choose to contest the claim.

If Cornejo’s lawyer can argue that the state didn’t make a good faith effort to notify Cornejo, it may set a precedent that will help men not only in Texas but also in other states.

This whole “Nudge, nudge, wink, wink” and “We went through the motions, who does it hurt?” bulls~~~ has to stop. Governments, hospitals, and doctors purposely aid and abet paternity fraud crimes to the tune of billions every years, but it doesn’t count because it only impacts men and it’s for the “good of the children”. If just one man can get a ruling saying he wasn’t notified in a timely manner and that no real effort was made to notify him, the whole rotten system may start to crumble.

All we need is one leak in the dam…

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 42]

I would seriously consider fragging that motherf~~~ing lawyer and telling it “don’t think you’re gonna weasel out of this, YOU’RE SLATED FOR EXISTENTIAL JUDGMENT”, then justice SWIFTLY DELIVERED!

Stay away and GIVE THEM NOTHING!

[MonkParticipant 16995]

Some years ago, I came across a case in which a man noticed a deduction from his pay. He queried this with the pay department and was told that it had been imposed by the Child Support Agency.

It emerged that some slut in the pay department had got pregnant. She took his personal details from his file and used them to name him as the father and to enable an award and deductions to be made.

He didn’t know her, had never even spoken to her. He probably didn’t even know that she existed.

He had to take a paternity test to prove that it was impossible that he was the father (he was fortunate that here in the UK, the courts generally abide by these. A negative result is usually decisive).

He then threatened the CSA with a lawsuit. They paid him compensation.

She kept her job and was never prosecuted.

Even staying away from them isn’t enough. They can try and rape you even if you are a total stranger.

Later, in a separate case, the CSA admitted that because false allegations of paternity were so common they had an amount set aside in their budget for compensation payouts.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

Ironic that the same gender that will so easily lie, cheat and steal as easily as this would now be complaining so vigorously as they are that they can’t find a ‘good man’ to love, honor and cherish them…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[OldBillParticipant]

Monk wrote:

(he was fortunate that here in the UK, the courts generally abide by these. A negative result is usually decisive).

That’s not the case here in the US. While the periods vary by state, you have a certain period of time – in some cases only weeks – in which to contest a paternity claim. After that, nothing whatsoever can overturn the a legal determination of paternity.

That’s why state governments, hospitals, and child service agencies run the notification scams I wrote about earlier. By going through the motions, they can claim they “tried” to notify the purported father and that he “chose” not to contest the claim. The fact that the notification system is a farce doesn’t enter into the equation.

The process is deliberately broken, corruptly administrated, and cynically defended from reform. The same filth who work in these courts and agencies are then somehow shocked and bewildered when the public expresses little faith in those institutions.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[foghornleghornParticipant 3449]

My rule of thumb is to treat any woman like you would treat dog s~~~. Always use a plastic bag to pick it up and dispose as fast as possible.

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

Monk wrote:

Some years ago, I came across a case in which a man noticed a deduction from his pay. He queried this with the pay department and was told that it had been imposed by the Child Support Agency.

It emerged that some slut in the pay department had got pregnant. She took his personal details from his file and used them to name him as the father and to enable an award and deductions to be made.

He didn’t know her, had never even spoken to her. He probably didn’t even know that she existed.

He had to take a paternity test to prove that it was impossible that he was the father (he was fortunate that here in the UK, the courts generally abide by these. A negative result is usually decisive).

He then threatened the CSA with a lawsuit. They paid him compensation.

She kept her job and was never prosecuted.

Even staying away from them isn’t enough. They can try and rape you even if you are a total stranger.

Later, in a separate case, the CSA admitted that because false allegations of paternity were so common they had an amount set aside in their budget for compensation payouts.

That is f~~~ing unreal.

[SESQUI ano estParticipant 2535]

sidecar wrote:

That’s probably his best play here. Tell the judge in no uncertain terms that he will never, no matter what the judge rules, under any circumstances pay for that woman’s spawn by another man, and he will go total scorched earth. They can jail him, but they cannot force him to pay. And that costs them.

I love the idea of a scorched earth policy. Can’t get blood from a stone.

Everyday above ground is a good one. Everyday above ground while single...better still.

[Anonymous 18]

@monk that is really illogical, extremely dangerous situation you described.

I sincerely try to give women benefit of doubt but stories like that do make me want to see women as tropical parasites found in exotic locations.

While you are mesmerized by the beauty the larva are budding inside your organs.

If there ever was a God he said, “Enough! Let there be MGTOW”. Eve went bat s~~~ crazy over that. And called God a meeesawjeanist but Adam was ROFL by then.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

sidecar wrote:

Facts have no place in the family courts.

Anti-family courts.

Here’s a surprise…. child support is VOLUNTARY.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Keymaster wrote:

Here’s a surprise…. child support is VOLUNTARY.

Just like income taxes are “voluntary”.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

Old Bill Writes

Duplicate.

See: /forums/topic/houston-man-must-pay-child-support-for-kid-thats-not-his/

The last post was a little over 3 hours ago.

Did you even f~~~ing bother to look first? The first thread even has the same title as your duplicate.

Yes, I did look, in several places actually. Threads never change places from minute to minute on a popular server?

I didn’t realize this was such an offense as to warrant a reply such as yours.

Good day to you, Old Bill.

[~BSParticipant 3266]

“There were three garnishments of $31 each when he worked at a dealership. He’s never gotten a letter from the state of Texas,” Coleman said. “At issue is he’s still not the father. Nobody is disputing that. The mother is not disputing that.”

—————

Regarding the garnishments in question. I can see how 3 garnishments of only $31 would be overlooked. How often do people normally closely examine their paystubs?

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[OldBillParticipant]

~BS wrote:

Regarding the garnishments in question. I can see how 3 garnishments of only $31 would be overlooked. How often do people normally closely examine their paystubs?

That’s a tiny amount, even smaller than the ~$80 I calculated in an earlier post. It’s just a few hours overtime or a change in health plans. If he was paid twice a month, as a majority of people in the US are, the amount is even smaller in relation to his overall pay.

As both you and I note, how closely does the average person look at their pay stubs? Generally all folks do is look at the hours and the bottom line while ignoring all the rest.

So, Texas garnished less than $100 from him 16 years ago, never told him why, stopped the garnishment, never told him that either, and now they want $65,000?

It’s insanity.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Author]

Posts