Houston man must pay child support for kid that's not his

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

http://abc7ny.com/news/court-man-who-isnt-father-of-child-still-owes-payments/2240073/
Video

HOUSTON, Texas —
A Houston man is fighting a court order that demands he make child support payments for a child who biologically isn’t his.

Gabriel Cornejo may need to pay $65,000 to support someone else’s child – who he only met once.

“I never thought in my whole life I would have to defend myself of something that I am innocent of,” Cornejo said.

Cornejo, a father who’s raising his own three kids and two nephews, said he found out about the child support payments when a deputy showed up at his door last year. The deputy gave Cornejo court papers that claimed the state of Texas thinks he has another child.

The child, a teenaged girl, is daughter of his ex-girlfriend, who he broke up with 16 years ago. Cornejo, who claimed he never met the girl, set out to meet her for the first time.

“She’s a wonderful girl,” he said. “Very smart. A lot going on for herself.”

Cornejo, his wife and his ex-girlfriend all agreed he should get a paternity test, and he did.

“The results came in,” Cornejo said. “I’m not the father.”

But that wasn’t the end of the case.

Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend still wants the money, and so does the state of Texas.

In 2003, Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend went to court and said Cornejo was the only possible father of her child.

The state of Texas got what it calls a “default judgement” and started assessing child support payments. They continued to add up, and now total nearly $65,000. Cornejo said he was never told.

Court records suggest, but do not prove, that he got a subpoena years ago. Cornejo denies it.

The ex-girlfriend’s lawyer, Carel Stith, said child support was taken from Cornejo’s paycheck long ago, and Cornejo never fought it. That can be enough to establish a lock-tight claim that he should’ve dealt with this issue years earlier.

“Don’t stick your head in the sand because it’s not going to go away,” Stith said. “There can be consequences even if you don’t do anything.”

Unless Cornejo and his lawyer, Cheryl Coleman, can convince a judge to take a second look at his case, there’s nothing that can change the old court order, meaning Cornejo will still owe all of that money.

“They say he should have fought back then, and he failed to do so,” Coleman said. “But how can you fight something you don’t know anything about?”

If the court doesn’t reopen the case, he either pays or faces jail time. The case will be back in court in August. Cornejo says whatever the outcome, he hopes for a state law change that can prevent situations like his.

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

It’s probably Pual Elam mispronouncing the word cornholio.

There’s no fighting the Matrix

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[AutoliteParticipant]

I would have thought that a DNA test was pretty conclusive. How do you challenge that?

In any case you stay well clear of single mothers! Not being the biological father means s~~~. If you act “in the capacity of a parent”, you could be on the hook for CS payments. In Canada, a grandparent can be forced to make CS payments. Don’t even make eye contact with anyone else’s kid…

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

“all mothers are single mothers”

Greg Silverado

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9547]

$65,000 for a kid that isn’t even his? Blood-sucking vampires!

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Anonymous 11]

Where’s the f~~~ing Chad. Women never forget their Chads. Why did they not interrogate her for his name and make him pay? She knows who the real father is.

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

$65,000 ??

Try, about $90,000

A man has to pay taxes first on the money he makes before being able to pay child support.

Every dollar paid in child support started off as about $1.35

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Autolite wrote:

I would have thought that a DNA test was pretty conclusive. How do you challenge that?

Facts have no place in the family courts.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

$65,000 for a kid that isn’t even his? Blood-sucking vampires!

Man that would suck…but what would be even worse is 65,000 dollars for a kid that was yours and realizing you missed out on the kids entire childhood and never actually got to be a father to them. The guy was raising 3 of his own kids and 2 that weren’t his already…my guts telling me he wouldn’t have been the absent father type had the kid been his.

[Old RottweilerParticipant 1520]

Women don’t believe in fairness. Only what’s in it for them.

Why would you take a chance with those creatures?

[bladeParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

Autolite wrote:

I would have thought that a DNA test was pretty conclusive. How do you challenge that?

Facts have no place in the family courts.

That is so spot on . People don’t realise that until they go thru it . Perjury is not punished but encouraged .

That lawyer stith sounds like a real c~~~ of a thing

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

This makes my f~~~ing blood boil.

[Anonymous 5]

Damn…

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

That lying bitch knows damn well who the real father is. The reason she somehow can’t remember who she spread for is that it’s some POS loser (likely on drugs and probably in jail) who has no chance to ever produce any money for her. So she sends the state collectors at the guy with the job… because, why not? What does she have to lose? Jailbird has no money anyway, and there are no consequences to her for running the paternity scam on this guy.

And her slime bag lawyer takes the position that “since we already stole some money from him years ago with those fraudulent wage garnishing, and he didn’t do anything about it, that means he owes us some more…”. In what f~~~ed up world does that logic fly? It’s not very different from stealing someone’s identity and running up some debt in their name… And if they don’t find out about it and stop you, then they owe you some more money”.

A prostitute is far more honest.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Dashing Young DissidentSpectator]

BrainPilot wrote:

That lying bitch knows damn well who the real father is. The reason she somehow can’t remember who she spread for is that it’s some POS loser (likely on drugs and probably in jail) who has no chance to ever produce any money for her. So she sends the state collectors at the guy with the job… because, why not? What does she have to lose? Jailbird has no money anyway, and there are no consequences to her for running the paternity scam on this guy.

And her slime bag lawyer takes the position that “since we already stole some money from him years ago with those fraudulent wage garnishing, and he didn’t do anything about it, that means he owes us some more…”. In what f~~~ed up world does that logic fly? It’s not very different from stealing someone’s identity and running up some debt in their name… And if they don’t find out about it and stop you, then they owe you some more money”.

A prostitute is far more honest.

Well said man.

[Anonymous 2]

BrainPilot wrote:

That lying bitch knows damn well who the real father is. The reason she somehow can’t remember who she spread for is that it’s some POS loser (likely on drugs and probably in jail) who has no chance to ever produce any money for her. So she sends the state collectors at the guy with the job… because, why not? What does she have to lose? Jailbird has no money anyway, and there are no consequences to her for running the paternity scam on this guy.

And her slime bag lawyer takes the position that “since we already stole some money from him years ago with those fraudulent wage garnishing, and he didn’t do anything about it, that means he owes us some more…”. In what f~~~ed up world does that logic fly? It’s not very different from stealing someone’s identity and running up some debt in their name… And if they don’t find out about it and stop you, then they owe you some more money”.

A prostitute is far more honest.

Actually, there are other likely scenarios:

1. The real father is a guy who she had a one night stand with and never got more than his first name, so she can’t name him in a paternity suit.

2. The real father could be one of many guys that she f~~~ed in that short time period, but she doesn’t want to go saying that she rode the c~~~ carousel so much that she had too many dicks in her to count.

This is the next phase, gentlemen. The government is tired of footing the bill, so they will just send innocent men to jail to keep the gravy train going for women. And neither Trump, nor any of the other conservative politicians will stand up against it because they support gynocentrism just as much as the liberals do.

We’re on our own, gentlemen, and we can’t go bulls~~~ting ourselves into believing that any politician is on our side, no matter what party they are in. I always tell people who want me to identify as being on the left or the right “You know what side I’m on? MY SIDE! Because nobody on the left or the right supports me, so I sure as f~~~ will not go supporting them!” We only have our fellow brothers to count on for support. That is why this community is so important. Everybody needs their daily dose of red pills, and everybody needs a place where they can talk to their brothers that have also woken up, ask for advice, and even confess to having relapses.

This sending innocent men to jail will ultimately result in a major backlash. When you read stories like this, sex robots seem like an awfully good option, don’t they?

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

So much for “equality”.

It doesn’t matter that the Houston man is not the father. The lying bitch wants money. And the Family Court is only to happy to oblige.

This is basically theft.

I remember when I paid a visit to the Family Court. Truth, facts, logic and fairness are not exactly pillars of the Family Court. My little cupcake ran off with a preacher and she was too emotionally upset with the adultery to work for a while.

This is why I don’t take ladies back to my home and why I don’t cohabitate. You don’t want to see the inside of a Family Court.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

BrainPilot wrote:

In what f~~~ed up world does that logic fly?

In the f~~~ed up world of the family courts. See above. I’ve never been, but most of the s~~~ I’ve seen come out of family courts is total f~~~ing bizarro world.

Anonymous wrote:

The government is tired of footing the bill, so they will just send innocent men to jail to keep the gravy train going for women.

Except if the government sends this innocent man to jail they’ll be on the hook for all his other children as well.

That’s probably his best play here. Tell the judge in no uncertain terms that he will never, no matter what the judge rules, under any circumstances pay for that woman’s spawn by another man, and he will go total scorched earth. They can jail him, but they cannot force him to pay. And that costs them.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Cornejo is an idiot.
There’s ground to sue her for falsely accusing him to be the father

In 2003, Cornejo’s ex-girlfriend went to court and said Cornejo was the only possible father of her child.

That have been proven to be false, there are grounds for suing her.

As long as men will just only defend themselves without proper counter-attacks, they’re going to lose.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

sidecar wrote:

Except if the government sends this innocent man to jail they’ll be on the hook for all his other children as well.

That’s probably his best play here. Tell the judge in no uncertain terms that he will never, no matter what the judge rules, under any circumstances pay for that woman’s spawn by another man, and he will go total scorched earth. They can jail him, but they cannot force him to pay. And that costs them.

He should sue the false accuser + do the above.
Both things.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts