Ho Hum Another Anti-MGTOW article.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10962]

Ran across another website with an article shaming and ridiculing MGTOW and it’s members.
The only strategy these morons have is to criticize what they don’t understand.

http://www.adultsocialskills.com/mgtow.html

She's not looking for love. She's looking for someone to finance the lifestyle that SHE thinks SHE deserves.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

No. Read this article carefully. This is the kind of article that I love to see. You’ll notice immediately that it has obviously been written by a bitter feminist, who hates the fact that men are walking away. She tries chiding them in saying MGTOW is a magnet for men who have lost everything to a woman, and she’s off having exotic holidays with the with the guys money and is f~~~ing someone else.

She even tries to say that the guys that get dumped end up broke and in mom’s basement. But the woman, if she’s not fat, will have unlimited offers of dates and partners regardless of her age. While sexy single divorcees get bombarded with on-line offers to go on dates and trips with younger men (that she will pay for with his support payments), the guy will find himself sending out messages on POF, OKC, etc. and getting no replies.

This is just a feminists wet dream and no one is going to take it serious.

[FaxmodemParticipant 1415]

What a BS article, We go MGTOW to get away from relationships with women, marriage and all that crap that comes with it. How the hell can it say were being rejected by women when, there the ones who reject us. Through divorcing and saying I don’t NEED A MAN.

The reason I don’t have a Girlfriend is because I don’t want one or need one. Had one a long time ago and it was hell (selfish bitch) . I love my freedom. I rather be shot than get married. As I know to many guys destroyed by divorce and the family courts.

This is just shamming tactic, what do they think we will come back to the plantation, too late cupcake. It shows there getting scared of us as MIGTOW grows in size as more men and say to hell with Marriage.

Us men didn't start the battle of the sexes, but we're clearly going to win it via the simple tactic of just leaving the battlefield in contempt."

[OrlandoParticipant 833]

Socially normal people are largely unaware of and uninterested in MGTOW

Uh oh, someone’s trying to divert men into buying a s~~~ty pua manual. Credit card will only be charged $30 per month…..forever.

[Anonymous 42]

AdultSocialSkills.com
Free advice for adults on how to make friends and become more social.

Oh look, a website devoted to taking it up the ass!

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10962]

Robert Hallam wrote:

No. Read this article carefully. This is the kind of article that I love to see. You’ll notice immediately that it has obviously been written by a bitter feminist, who hates the fact that men are walking away. She tries chiding them in saying MGTOW is a magnet for men who have lost everything to a woman, and she’s off having exotic holidays with the with the guys money and is f~~~ing someone else.

She even tries to say that the guys that get dumped end up broke and in mom’s basement. But the woman, if she’s not fat, will have unlimited offers of dates and partners regardless of her age. While sexy single divorcees get bombarded with on-line offers to go on dates and trips with younger men (that she will pay for with his support payments), the guy will find himself sending out messages on POF, OKC, etc. and getting no replies.

This is just a feminists wet dream and no one is going to take it serious.

I see what you mean. I just thought it was wrong that this article appeared under a website titled “Adultsocialskills.com” and yet it seems like a thinly disguised slam on MGTOW.

She's not looking for love. She's looking for someone to finance the lifestyle that SHE thinks SHE deserves.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22624]

Robert Hallam wrote:

She tries chiding them in saying MGTOW is a magnet for men who have lost everything to a woman, and she’s off having exotic holidays with the with the guys money and is f~~~ing someone else.

It sounds like she is making the argument for MGTOW existing. No by likes to have everything stole and then forced to pay for the vacation of the person whom stole their stuff.

[OrlandoParticipant 833]

From the FAQ:

17. Do your methods involve hurting or being mean to other people?

For the most part, no….

Ok!

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

When I go out I see more and more men either solo or with other men enjoying themselves. These other men can be found smiling and enjoying themselves together, with no women around. They definitely do not look like “socially isolated” men. The few decent looking women I see with a man, the man is not attractive looking; meaning their pool of suckers is drying up.

This article talks about “rejected men” – when the problem is exactly the opposite. It is impossible for women to reject money. Any man can get as many women as he likes, any time he wants, with nothing more than money. Does the author believe that enough fame or money will prevent women from being women? What a f~~~ing moron. Men have seen the last two generations of men destroyed by this system. Game Over.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

It’s an excellent article, because it shows a very high level of aggressivity towards men and lack of empathy towards women (!!!) from the author.
She sounds like an harpy and a gold-digger, and such kind of article is unwillingly doing recruitment for MGTOW – read here:

Guys who lose their financial resources have zero dating market value (age 30+), while girls can be poor as long as they are not overweight
For a guy who loses all his money, he immediately becomes someone who is dead to women.

Basically she’s unwillingly confirming that women are just only interested about money.
That’s not even true: most women are mostly interested about commitment, support comes after that.

All his hard work and trying to “do everything right” throughout his life has now gone to benefit the woman who dumped him and left him forced to pay her the money she now uses to take (normally younger) men out on dates or vacations with her.

Alternatively, the support payments and money may be used to fund trips to the Caribbean where she engages in relationships and sex with other men.

This is a terrible picture: I’m sure that this happens pretty often, but I don’t think that all divorces end in such extremes. Probably nor even the majority of divorces end so. Women are always better off than men, but it’s not that most divorced wifes are now living a life of parties and vacations on the Caribbean with the toy boys. Just think about your wives, guys: they’re bitches, they extracted all the resources they could from you, but it’s still an house and half your wage, and that doesn’t mean they’re now suddenly rich: they are better off than you, just only due the house.
This is giving a picture that is even worse than the average and it’s basically a recruitment for MGTOW, especially for younger unmarried MGTOW who will be scared by such words.
In their will of depicting MGTOW as unusual and extreme, they’ve exaggerated our actual issues.
The last part is truly a recruitment (though unwillingly done) for younger MGTOW.

I also checked their site: it’s about improving social skills, but it’s heavily focused on “messages”, “texting” and “facebook”.
I don’t even get the meaning of such kind of socialization.

The subtle implication of all her reasoning is that’s impossible that a man could be uninterested about women, the subtle implication is that men are like drones always willingly to hit on women.
She simply doesn’t realize that men have agency.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[BrujahParticipant 579]

It’s an insult to proper journalism to call it an article. It’s more like a marketing push to get the socially inept to pick up whatever they are selling.

Do you know who are looking up sites on being more social? The socially inept. Who make up a number of blue pillers? The socially inept. Once they somehow “acquire” the skills that can be gained from that site, they will go start playing the game. Let them stew in it for a couple years. See you when I see you.

Their definition of MGTOW seem to touch more on True Forced Loneliness types. A number of them eventually gravitate towards MGTOW but it’s easy to see why the lines could be blurred.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Ah yes, the same predictable “rejected by women” horses~~~.

And we know it’s horses~~~… because being “rejected” is not exclusive to MGTOW. It’s not even exclusive to MEN!

Outwardly “attractive” women are rejected, and can’t even get a DATE! And they are having such a hard time of it, they wrote music videos and songs about it!

—

So it fails right off the bat.

What IS exclusive to MGTOW is that we are the ONLY class of men who make a point of rejecting women – and loving every f~~~ing second of it. That article is massive fail and just like any woman can’t handle rejection, they have to cover it up any way they can.

Any moron can see it’s not the woman doing the “rejecting” here.

Mr. Spock wrote:

The only strategy these morons have is to criticize what they don’t understand.

And can’t afford to admit.

Robert Hallam wrote:

This is the kind of article that I love to see…. She tries chiding them in saying MGTOW is a magnet for men who have lost everything to a woman

I also love hearing that because it gives women away. How is she SO SURE of that? Is she implying she KNOWS women are destructive thieves in marriage and relationships where they should be loving and kind?

Well thanks for the warning honey. And we will certainly look out for that!

I – for one – am not one of those men.
I never paid a woman to f~~~ off and get lost.
No woman stole my house and cash.
No woman cucked me into fatherhood against my will.
No woman got away with making a false accusation. Even though one actually tried.

And no woman ever will. Because of other men who have been there.
Getting destroyed by women and “losing everything” is not exclusive to MGTOW either.

The only thing that’s exclusive to MGTOW is that MGTOW are smarter than women who write s~~~ like that. But since she is so sure that’s why men go their own way, then she as just confirmed what MGTOW already know.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[OrlandoParticipant 833]

Please note: While some of our methods involve dishonestly[sic], it is that of a relatively harmless nature that is normal/common in the social world.

I don’t know who the author is, but they’re cracking me up! Holy s~~~.

This site is about parting gullible men and their money.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Orlando wrote:

Uh oh, someone’s trying to divert men into buying a s~~~ty pua manual.

Thats even more to the point! Want to know who gets “rejected by women” more than anyone? PUAS!! “Approach, approach, approach!” they say (and teach!) and the very concept of Pick-up-artistry is just increasing “approaches” to increase the number of women who won’t say “no”… but very professional PUA can tell you the “rejection” rate is still 90% and more.

I HATE that word: “approach”.

You approach the edge of a cliff.
You approach a lion’s cage.

You don’t need to “approach” a woman. She’s just a woman. Not a dentist’s chair.
It doesn’t require any skill, training or stealth.

Nobody is “rejected” more by women than a goddam PUA.

•••••••

Wanna know what not PUA course will ever teach you? Don’t “approach” any woman at all. Make a gesture with your finger and motion her to come to YOU. BOOM! No “approaching” required. And no “rejection” can possibly take place. Because she has just approached YOU. And if you decide you don’t like her YOU reject her. That’s how it works, and you won’t read that in any “PUA” manual.

Every “rejection” from a woman is her doing you a FAVOR.
That much is certain.

The author of that article confirmed it now, too.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Maybe it’s all about natural checks and balances. Women grow a planetary size ego, MGTOW come along and effortlessly pop it. We’re offering the only spiritual food we’ve ever been fed throughout our lives, the spiritual food being rejection.
They’re lucky, for every 10 rejections placed on men only one pops back out.

Reject a woman once; fire, smoke, and brimstone pops out 10 fold!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Keymaster wrote:

Orlando wrote:

Uh oh, someone’s trying to divert men into buying a s~~~ty pua manual.

Thats even more to the point! Want to know who gets “rejected by women” more than anyone? PUAS!! “Approach, approach, approach!” they say (and teach!) and the very concept of Pick-up-artistry is just increasing “approaches” to increase the number of women who won’t say “no”… but very professional PUA can tell you the “rejection” rate is still 90% and more.

I HATE that word: “approach”.

You approach the edge of a cliff.
You approach a lions cage.

You don’t need to “approach” a woman. She’s juts a woman. Not a dentist’s chair.
Nobody is “rejected” more by women than a goddam PUA.

I fully confirm it.
In my 20s I was something similar to a PUA (though such word didn’t exist, and I was way less manipulative than an actual PUA).
The main secret of being PUA-like is being willingly to approach women on an industrial scale, like in a factory, and don’t giving a s~~~ about a rejection: a rejection is just a waste of time – indeed, one of the things we (me and my friends) liked more were “hostile” environment with girls with an attitude to immediatly reject boys. Do you guess why? Because if she immediatly rejects me, after less than 5 minutes, I have a lot more time for many other approachs with other women. The real problem was when a woman played with me for three hours and then she didn’t put out – and the “skill” was exactly about recognising such kind of women – sometimes with very ludicrous and unexpected failures at recognizing them*.
I have not even an hint about how many times I have ben rejected: I’m not even sure about the exact number of women I f~~~ed, I’m pretty sure it’s a little more than 100, it can be 110-120 or something. I guess rejections had been 4 or 5 times more, maybe even 6 times more, that mean 500 rejections. I barely remember a third, for sure no more than an half, of the women I actually f~~~ed, why I should remember or being affected by the women who rejected me?

* = A friend of mine once gave up to a girl, because he tought she wasn’t going to put out in a reasonable time.
Some years after it turns out she have pursuited the porn career 😀
I mocked him for that thing – after many years it happened – even three weeks ago 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Eric Lauder wrote:

actual PUA). The main secret of being PUA-like is being willingly to approach women on an industrial scale, like in a factory, and don’t giving a s~~~ about a rejection: a rejection is just a waste of time – indeed, one of the things we (me and my friends) liked more were “hostile” environment with girls with an attitude to immediatly reject boys. Do you guess why? Because if she immediatly rejects me, after less than 5 minutes, I have a lot more time for many other approachs with other women.

Oh I have seen those videos and seminars on “approaching women” and I just can’t help but shake my head. Teaching “approaching women” is like teaching someone to breathe air.

Just make eye contact and wave her to come over! Done!

If she doesn’t, who gives a s~~~. Another one will, but it’s still not a “rejection”. The entire concept of female “rejection” ( and over use of that word ) is solely to falsely elevate her desirability and they PRETEND it’s something to be devastated by.

It isn’t.

Once any man realizes this.. it’s GAME OVER for women who think their rejection is some kind of tragedy. That’s the day all mention of “female rejection” as some kind of major devastation becomes… HILARIOUS. Because even that author just told you, letting that woman into your life will be even MORE devastating. She knows it too.

Really nicely done, toots.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

That article is one of the kind gem just because it reads like something a fifth grader would write. You don’t usually find unadulterated stupidity like that. Most stupid writers usually make an attempt to look pseudo intellectual, but not this snowflake. I giggled many times reading every time I saw examples of linear thinking. I found the bits about the money and vacations most disturbing – sounds like she’s speaking from personal experience or someone in her close circle of friends. Funny how she thinks she has value simply because she’s not fat. She is also so hooked up in the matrix, that she thinks people who don’t get attention online suffer immensely and empty inbox is like a death sentence.

Overall review – I liked it very much. It’s entertaining to read unadulterated stupidity. Very refreshing compared to pseudo intellectual garbage.

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

There gave been more articles written on MGTOW in the last year than every before.

The feminists are in damage control mode.

No amount of negative articles will stop a run away train.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Keymaster wrote:

Wanna know what not PUA course will ever teach you? Don’t “approach” any woman at all. Make a gesture with your finger and motion her to come to YOU. BOOM! No “approaching” required. And no “rejection” can possibly take place. Because she has just approached YOU. And if you decide you don’t like her YOU reject her. That’s how it works, and you won’t read that in any “PUA” manual.

Every “rejection” from a woman is her doing you a FAVOR.
That much is certain.

The author of that article confirmed it now, too.

Three or four days BEFORE the separation I sweared “I’ll never try to approach a woman again”.
And I never did it.
Still, after the separation I had sex with 5 women, including my actual partner and a M2F.
And I “rejected” 3 women (“rejected” with quotation marks because it’s way more subtle than the opposite rejection by a woman, but still I’m very sure it was hurting for them) – well, it’s actually 4 women I rejected, if I include even my ex-wife: that was a rejection without quotation marks 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts