GMOW without ever being married?

[narwhalParticipant]

Viva Pinochet! wrote:

I, for one, believe there is nothing fundamentally wrong with female nature. God created them perfect and gave them the noblest purpose of all: the continuation of our species. And that worked just fine for the last couple THOUSANDS of years.

Childbirth and the maternal instinct are essential, but obviously not nearly enough to continue the species. Seriously, besides being half the genetic code, men have provided the food and labor and governing of society in order to allow women to do their thing. It does not happen without men. Saying that childbirth is somehow more noble that all that men provide does make much sense.

I think the nature of both men and women is fundamentally flawed. It requires a society and morality to help protect men and women from their own nature as well as the nature of others. What we have to idea is the false idea that men are the cause of the bad nature of women, or that women simply don’t have them…thus remove the checks on women. The effect is really that much worse for men because much of bad behavior can’t just be ignored, someone has to take the consequences…usually men.

Ok. Then do it.

[The Manipulated ManParticipant 1856]

Viva Pinochet! wrote:

Feminism, OTOH, has but one purpose: to corrupt and destroy female nature, turning it into an evil mockery of its former self. It’s no surprise that abortion is a the center of every single feminist movement’s agenda. By taking the noblest thing about women (their maternal instinct) and turning it into something twisted and utilitarian, feminism succeds in its goal of turning god’s perfection into walking and talking monsters.

Agreed.

Here is a poster from the Old World that illustrates how much power the “evil mockery” has:

And our Old Time culture kept much of it to a tolerable level.

But, it is my understanding that our Great Enemy is really just letting the “Woman’s Nature” Genie out of the bottle.

An examination of the history of our Ancient civilizations, will reveal that it has happened back then too.

That “Evil Mockery” is not really as new as it appears. Something behind it is prehistoric and primal.

The Narcissism that is hardwired inside every woman is a biological requirement for the propagation of the species!

Viva Pinochet! wrote:

I, for one, believe there is nothing fundamentally wrong with female nature. God created them perfect and gave them the noblest purpose of all: the continuation of our species. And that worked just fine for the last couple THOUSANDS of years.

Yes, those Feminine aspects of women are what most of us Heterosexual men are attracted to. I agree with you about the value of those charming qualities that you define as “female nature.”

However, with all due respect, the “Woman’s Nature” described in MGTOW is different than what you are writing/ thinking about.

MGTOWs are mostly looking at the cold blooded Narcissistic, Parasitic, and manipulative aspects which we define as “Women’s Nature.”

Furthermore, Women’s Narcissism, Parasitic traits, and Manipulation cannot be seen by a man in Blue Pill Hell. All he can see are the charming aspects of women which you have listed.

When a man is ready to open his mind to the possibility of a Timeless/ Primal force of Nature that we are calling “Women’s Nature,” the proof will present itself.

Keep digging into the Archives here and you will find Treasure.

Here is a poster from ancient times from South Asia which illustrates the reality of “Woman’s Nature:”

What happens when a man finally comprehends the cold and calculating thoughts that are going through a woman's mind, while her eyes are brimming with tears?

[Anonymous 3]

Very well pit & excellently written. Frankly, right now I do not see a way out of the morass this society/world is in.
Maybe we just need to start over. I will say this I am glad there are still men with a critical eye like yourself.

[Author]

Posts