Gays are UNTRUSTWORTHY AND TREACHEROUS.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

You know, the gay men I’ve known were all assholes, but Milo showed me that it’s not fair to generalize.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

You know, the gay men I’ve known were all assholes, but Milo showed me that it’s not fair to generalize.

You know the funniest thing ? Say to a leftist that they only hate Milo because he is homosexual ! They start a total meltdown ! It’s unacceptable to a leftist to hate anyone in a minority group, so they will try to justify for hours and hours they point and why they hate Milo !

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

it’s not fair to generalize.

Not only is it fair, it’s essential.

It’s actually a requirement to generalize if you want to learn anything in the world…. as long as the generalization is true and accurate. Milo is clearly the lowest common denominator – and a rare exception – and it’s dishonest to ignore the 99.99% in favor of the 0.01%.

The odd “Milo” doesn’t cancel the majority out.
Generalizations are essential to learning.

Saying “birds fly” is a true generalization. They can’t say “it’s not fair to generalize” simply because penguins & ostriches don’t.

The “you can’t generalize / it’s not fair!” zealots are constantly trying to disprove the actions and behavior vast majority by pulling focus to an odd ONE.

Where have we seen that before?

“Stop generalizing! I’m not like that!! I know millions of others who are like that, but I’m not like that!! You should stop generalizing. “

She hasn’t thought it through very carefully.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Gays are UNTRUSTWORTHY AND TREACHEROUS.

Gays WOMEN are UNTRUSTWORTHY AND TREACHEROUS.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Leftist KOOKs DO make generalizations—IF it is consistent with their dogma; and they reject generalizations when it doesn’t. Example:

Some crazy criminal takes a gun and kills some folks—ALL gun-owners are mass killers.

A cop unjustifiably shoots someone—ALL cops are bad/evil and massacring folks.

BUT

Mooslums kill/rape etc by the hundreds—SORRY can’t generalize about ANY mooslums

[MadBikerParticipant 169]

As i am relatively new to this forum I may have missed something but I was under the impression that this forum was intended for heterosexual males to support each other when they have been f~~~ed over by a heterosexual female and thereby the rationale as to why gay men would wish to participate in this forum escapes me.

However, that having been said, I must say that Manipulated Man and Keymaster have made some interesting points here and I agree with most of them.

The main problem that I have with gay men is that they allow women to champion their homosexuality and women, especially feminists, then use it as a stick to beat we heterosexual men with.

Women are forever telling heterosexual men who either disapprove or do not condone homosexuality that there is something wrong with them. If we do not accept homosexual conduct as normal male behaviour we are accused of being bigoted, homophobic, narrow minded and in every way we are attacked for our beliefs.

Gay men therefore are firmly in the blue pill camp.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

MadBiker wrote:

I may have missed something but I was under the impression that this forum was intended for heterosexual males to support each other when they have been f~~~ed over by a heterosexual female and thereby the rationale as to why gay men would wish to participate in this forum escapes me.

I can see both sides.

I have not kept up with all the new PC stuff on what lie we are supposed to say about how they became gay, but before all the s~~~ took over the predominant opinion was it often stemmed from a young boys having a reprehensible, over bearing mother. Which would certainly lead me to understand why a gay would think along the lines of “I have rejected women as well, and a lot sooner than most of you, so I belong.”

I have a hard time with it because they always (when organized as a group) throw their support towards women and feminism etc. They seem to have the same desire to destroy hetero men as feminists do.

[MadBikerParticipant 169]

Pedal

How and or why a man becomes or is born gay is another one of life’s great unknowns and sits alongside the other great mysteries of life like is there a God etc., but I agree with your point that feminists and gay men combine effectively to undermine heterosexual men.

I cannot however conceive of any situation where a gay man, who has no interest in women, should want to participate in this forum. Surely forums for other gay men would be a more suitable place for them to air their views.

[ThanasiParticipant 428]

I don’t like them. In my dealings with them, they have proven to be deceitful again and again. We were already warned about them by the ancients.

Gen 19:4-9

[MagusParticipant 424]

Ever see gay people in the locker room? Totally pathetic. They’ll hang out nude for hours in front of mirrors. Purposely making it difficult to get around them. Or how about the ones pretending to be texting or something while really filming?

We need one bathroom/changing area for both sexes. If women saw them doing that s~~~ they’d freak out and make such a scene the gays would stop. And all these horny heterosexual guys would gross out seeing ugly women. Maybe then women would no longer be on these pedestals and get away with all their s~~~.

[MagusParticipant 424]

Keymaster wrote:

It’s actually a requirement to generalize if you want to learn anything in the world…. as long as the generalization is true and accurate.

ABSOLUTELY true. The politically correct liberal ass holes of the world have made what should be common sense into something akin to being a monster.

I constantly tell people generalizations are a good thing. It is just like preparing. Preparing does not always work but not preparing is worse.

[,Participant 1301]

nah, not really.
maybe to their partners but in a work environment they seem to be motivated to just get ahead quickly.

with joy/without hate

[ThanasiParticipant 428]

Magus wrote:

Keymaster wrote:

It’s actually a requirement to generalize if you want to learn anything in the world…. as long as the generalization is true and accurate.

ABSOLUTELY true. The politically correct liberal ass holes of the world have made what should be common sense into something akin to being a monster.

I constantly tell people generalizations are a good thing. It is just like preparing. Preparing does not always work but not preparing is worse.

Too much virtue signalling that defies logic. Yes, they are deviants. No, you shouldn’t elevate them because of their deviancy or because you were brainwashed by the sodomite-controlled media.

[MagusParticipant 424]

Thanasi wrote:

Too much virtue signalling that defies logic. Yes, they are deviants. No, you shouldn’t elevate them because of their deviancy or because you were brainwashed by the sodomite-controlled media.

Elevating them? I’m no more elevating them than I’m elevating guys who like fat women. Nor am I virtue signalling by saying it is ok to judge. I think you misread what I wrote.

[ThanasiParticipant 428]

Magus wrote:

Thanasi wrote:

Too much virtue signalling that defies logic. Yes, they are deviants. No, you shouldn’t elevate them because of their deviancy or because you were brainwashed by the sodomite-controlled media.

Elevating them? I’m no more elevating them than I’m elevating guys who like fat women. Nor am I virtue signalling by saying it is ok to judge. I think you misread what I wrote.

Pardon me, even though I quoted you, I was actually making a comment about society in general.

[Anonymous 1]

I have no problem with gay people. personally, i don’t like CAMP gay men, but if a masculine gay man wants to f~~~ other men then go for it. for example, i really dislike Milo Yiannopolous but i respect Alan Turing greatly.

Historically, I think people’s main issue with gay men (or effeminate men) was that (a) they did not breed, which for a lot of ancient cultures was incredibly important to keep society functioning, and (b) they were not as good in the traditional masculine roles of fighting and hard labour.

Now, and in some of the advanced ancient civilisations, that stuff isn’t crucial for everyone to do, so being gay/effeminate isn’t really an issue

[Anonymous 1]

Hello. I’m gay. I’m not here to try to say that “Not all gay are like that” or “I’m different”, but I can see why some people can think like OP.

Being a part of a group doesn’t mean we can’t criticize said group. Gay men are inherently feminized, and in this days and age, almost all of them adopt the feminist way of thinking. Nowadays they celebrate their over the top sissiness by acting very “outrageous” (as if that’s a good adjective) and try to push people into accepting and normalize them. How do you ask people to normalize you when you acting abnormally? So that part, the part which shown on media, being all that “fabulous” and more noisy is ultra annoying. It annoyed me so much either.

That’s how I ended up making friends with straight people, to put down how should I put myself properly, as a person who is physically male, in this world. This doesn’t mean that I find all effeminate gay guy automatically deplorable. Many of them can’t help it. Many of them work as a man should, minding their own business, never bother to try to push other people normalize it, and be self sufficient. But yes, there’s a great chunk who are acting and thinking like female: looking for knight in shining armor, being controlling and nagging, obsessed with f~~~ing skin cares and fakeups, and considering themselves queens.

But, looking at how media portraying gays, or using gay personalities to furthering leftist agendas, it’s easy to see them as horrible people.

Fun fact: I often defriended by my fellow gaymen “friends” because I think Trump is making more sense, rejecting fat acceptance, and thinking that gay marriage is unimportant.

[Anonymous 1]

PistolPete wrote:

I do however believe that they are being dishonest when they take the position that homosexual sex is somehow “normal”. They know its a perversion and pretend it is not. And in a way Magus is right in that gay men anyway have a tendency to adopt both the mannerisms and attitudes of women. And we know that women are consummate liars, frauds and destroyers.

This. As gay as I can be, I can’t say with a straight face that homosexuality is “normal”. This may sound hypocritical, since I still enjoy the sex, but I can never say it’s normal.

Add female mannerism and attitude AND left-politics, add a pinch “being a victim because of minority”, bam you got a perfectly cringy gay behavior.

Look. Gay men are basically men. Being around women feminize them even more. I think the key is more exposure to more traditional men, and hopefully even if their mannerism is still feminine, at least their attitudes towards life is more masculine, which is better.

[NeroParticipant 1466]

Anonymous wrote:

PistolPete wrote:

I do however believe that they are being dishonest when they take the position that homosexual sex is somehow “normal”. They know its a perversion and pretend it is not. And in a way Magus is right in that gay men anyway have a tendency to adopt both the mannerisms and attitudes of women. And we know that women are consummate liars, frauds and destroyers.

This. As gay as I can be, I can’t say with a straight face that homosexuality is “normal”. This may sound hypocritical, since I still enjoy the sex, but I can never say it’s normal.

Add female mannerism and attitude AND left-politics, add a pinch “being a victim because of minority”, bam you got a perfectly cringy gay behavior.

Look. Gay men are basically men. Being around women feminize them even more. I think the key is more exposure to more traditional men, and hopefully even if their mannerism is still feminine, at least their attitudes towards life is more masculine, which is better.

Thanks for offering your opinion and having an honest dialogue about the gay man situation. I agree with your points and have no idea how to deal with it. Gay men seem to have a tendency to circle the wagons with other gay men and women, which is not exactly friendly to hetero-males.

I grew up knowing no one who was outwardly gay, then moving to a relatively openly gay city. I had to force myself to accept the difference in behavior. I never understood the need to act weird and obnoxious as a gay or lesbian. Just go suck a c~~~ or pound a hole like the rest of the world and STFU about it. That’s how I look at life. I think when people genuinely don’t give a f~~~ about sexuality, there will be no discrimination. It seems like the LGBT community want people to care more than they really should. Forcing people to give a f~~~ creates a lot of resentment. No one wants to be told what to do or how to think or what they “must” accept.

[Anonymous 1]

Nero wrote:

Forcing people to give a f~~~ creates a lot of resentment. No one wants to be told what to do or how to think or what they “must” accept.

I always think that ‘the need to be accepted and allowed to do whatever’, especially in gay communities is actually an outwardly reaction of the lack of self acceptance. I always find those obnoxious gay men are having a little to no self respect, and resented the fact that they’re different. It’s not a good start to do great in life in general.

Maybe what should be construct in people is ‘dont give a f~~~’ rather than ‘acceptance’. I don’t know though. I’m not a lawmaker and not speaking to all gays. Just my two cents

[Author]

Posts