Feminists Shut Down Red Pill Documentary

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

The counter-petition is already at 3,169 signatures against the 2,370 signatures by feminists, but I guess that at least 5,000 signatures are needed, because men are actually valued half than women.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

OldBill wrote:

Max Power wrote:

This aint the 80s anymore. Who needs a theatre screening for a film to be seen?

Someone whose crowdfunding efforts promised that the movie would be seen in theaters. Someone who is trying to establish a career as a documentary film maker and thus must exhibit her work festivals, galas, judged panels, and the like. Someone who wants her film to be eligible for industry awards, awards which require the film to be screened.

You know, stupid s~~~ like that.

Pretty much this.

It’s unlikely to be picked up by the cucked MSM to broadcast. Most channels are far too busy sucking up to political correctness. So she needs to potentially screen it somewhere to make it known to a wider audience outside of people within the Red Pill circles.

Femini$m are trying to shut it down simply because they can but this tactic won’t work forever.

People are waking up to it.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I’m not interested in viewing such movie. I know all that matters, enough.
I’m interested about that movie reaching a lot of still unaware men.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Ok KM, you know how much I love and respect you, but I have to disagree with a couple of items. I came here specifically as a result of the PUA community, and have always seen it as an extension of the “don’t ACT like you don’t care……(just) don’t care” philosophy I learned there.

So the very idea of:

Keymaster wrote:

men competing for females

is completely antithetical to everything I learned from PUA. Betas compete. The ENTIRE “gist” of the game is to position yourself in a way that you are perceived as being above competition. Very similar to the detachment of MGTOW.

Keymaster wrote:

Feminists “permit” PUAs because (in a way) they fall over themselves to give women what they want.

Again, you’re doing it wrong. PUA philsophy if done right, is far FAR more like MGTOW than I think most people here understand.

Understnad that there are a lot of VERY BAD wannabe PUAs out there that fall into the ass licking, boot kissing, mangina simpling cometition patterns. I get that, and I’m NOT talking about them.

I’m talking about the ones that essentially follow the MGTOW philosophy and have discovered that adopting that philosopht, internalizing it, and translating that into action and words (or lack thereof as the case may be) actually ends up getting more female attention.

Like a cat, if you just hand it the toy string it is bored and generally uninterested. Dangle it just out of their reach however…..

Ignoring women, backhanded compliments(negs), not giving a s~~~, being a general asshole, especially around women, – these are all hallmarks of what I would call REAL PUA. The kind of PUA that I see as a specialized application of the general MGTOW philosophy.

I just want to disspell the myth that PUA mean a bunch of magina simps begging/jumping through hoops to get pussy. That’s almost the EXACT OPPOSITE of what real pua is. The only possible exception is that sometimes you have a wingman that ACTS beta in order to make you look more Alpha. That’s just technique though and is pre-planned by two brothers in partnership (usually you take turns and reverse roles as needed).

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Feminists succeeded in preventing a female director from showing her movie. Well done, ladies, well done.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Biggvs_Dickvs wrote:

Ok KM, you know how much I love and respect you, but I have to disagree with a couple of items. I came here specifically as a result of the PUA community, and have always seen it as an extension of the “don’t ACT like you don’t care……(just) don’t care” philosophy I learned there.

So the very idea of:

Keymaster wrote:

men competing for females

is completely antithetical to everything I learned from PUA. Betas compete. The ENTIRE “gist” of the game is to position yourself in a way that you are perceived as being above competition. Very similar to the detachment of MGTOW.

Keymaster wrote:

Feminists “permit” PUAs because (in a way) they fall over themselves to give women what they want.

Again, you’re doing it wrong. PUA philsophy if done right, is far FAR more like MGTOW than I think most people here understand.

Understnad that there are a lot of VERY BAD wannabe PUAs out there that fall into the ass licking, boot kissing, mangina simpling cometition patterns. I get that, and I’m NOT talking about them.

I’m talking about the ones that essentially follow the MGTOW philosophy and have discovered that adopting that philosopht, internalizing it, and translating that into action and words (or lack thereof as the case may be) actually ends up getting more female attention.

Like a cat, if you just hand it the toy string it is bored and generally uninterested. Dangle it just out of their reach however…..

Ignoring women, backhanded compliments(negs), not giving a s~~~, being a general asshole, especially around women, – these are all hallmarks of what I would call REAL PUA. The kind of PUA that I see as a specialized application of the general MGTOW philosophy.

I just want to disspell the myth that PUA mean a bunch of magina simps begging/jumping through hoops to get pussy. That’s almost the EXACT OPPOSITE of what real pua is. The only possible exception is that sometimes you have a wingman that ACTS beta in order to make you look more Alpha. That’s just technique though and is pre-planned by two brothers in partnership (usually you take turns and reverse roles as needed).

You can’t really ‘not care’ when your goal is to get laid. You’re pretending you don’t want pussy. MGTOW is about not pretending.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

You can’t really ‘not care’ when your goal is to get laid. You’re pretending you don’t want pussy. MGTOW is about not pretending.

You goal can be to just go out and have a good time. If that happens to end up including getting laid then that’s fine too. The point is, you don’t give a f~~~ what any one female or group of same thinks of you or does.

And who ever said MGTOW was a f~~~ing monastery anyway? For those of us who do occasionally want to get laid, what is wrong with a little teamwork and sharing of effective techniques?

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Ill take that as a compliment.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

You can’t really ‘not care’ when your goal is to get laid. You’re pretending you don’t want pussy. MGTOW is about not pretending.

I had been something very similar to a PUA, in my 20s.
The point is that you don’t care, in the sense that you care (a lot) about getting pussy but each individual woman and her pussy have zero value.
My behavior and my friend’s behavior were different from modern PUAs: modern PUAs are too focused on the technique, about how to dress, about what to do. This is somewhat “beta”.
Our approach was way more “zero f~~~s given” – do you think that SUCH kind of approach is “pandering to women”?
1) Isolate the woman from her group – that’s the only hard step.
2) Start talking, keep talking and smiling a lot.
3) After about 10 minutes (but it varies according how you feel things are going) touch her in a very kind way, a caress on the cheek.
At the slightest sign of her being uncomfortable/not collaborating you have to leave immediatly making clear, without words just only with behavior, that she has been dumped: this behavior is a fake, in fact if she’s quickly at making clear that she isn’t intersted she’s doing you a favor because you have more time for trying more approaching other women – the tragedy is the rare chick who are able to keep you talking with them for something like more than an hour, even two hours, while giving you apparently good signals but then rejecting your physical touch while still keeping throwing you the green light.
That’s all, it’s like working in an assembly line I suppose (not sure since I never worked in an assembly line).
It’s boring on the long run because you learn with try-fail-try-again and after few months you’re able to get sex after few approachs but every damn approach is IDENTICAL to all the others, you even use the same words and phrases, almost in the same sequence.
There’s no such thing like “competition”: you’re the only one because you isolated her from the group and all you have to do it’s showing that you’re superior to her and giving her a great favor by talking with her, but this have to be done with a very sweet and even kidding approach, it’s actually slightly and subtly insulting to them but they don’t care. That may hurt/offend some or even many women but this is good: the “insults” aren’t sexualized and the women who get offensed will interrupt the contact: it’s good because that mean they weren’t ready to have sex, so you quickly de-selectioned them by making them thinking they’re rejecting you.

MGTOW is actually a superior state of such thing: you don’t even need the pussy anymore. The main difference between MGTOW and what I was is basically: now there’s online porn and fleshlights. I didn’t have such things in the 90s. With availability of fleshlights I would had, very likely, stopped after 20-30 chicks f~~~ed, or something: it’s more than enough experience and you already proved you can do it, then why insisting getting orgasms in the most uncomfortable way? Even Manolo use normal stairs on a daily basis, he doesn’t climb the building when he have to reach his apartment.

PUA is instead somewhat below, because they’re too focused on “the right strategy” and that means giving too much importance to the women. Also PUAs are focused on the look of the women: that’s stupid, I want have sex, every woman above the 6 is good for f~~~ing, end of discussion.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

I went through a PUA phase as well. And one of the things they taught, was to get into a frame where you simply did not give a s~~~. In not giving a s~~~, one loses inhibition. Even techniques do not matter at that point, because one is past all of that.

When I found MGTOW, I noticed that the same mindset, one of not giving zero f~~~s was a key aspect.

Ironically, and as many have mentioned in their own findings, when a man goes MGTOW. Gives zero f~~~s. He then enters this same place that PUA’s are trying to coach men into.

But the difference being, is that with MGTOW, it’s free and for life. Where with PUA, one could spend hundreds or thousands of dollars to learn a very simple truth.

I agree with JL’s findings. It is like an assembly line. Rote repetition. Through trial and error.

That is the irony if we compare MGTOW to PUA. One costs nothing and gets you exactly into the frame that PUA regard as the most productive or conducive in getting results with women. Mainly, not giving a s~~~. Which then is interpreted by the female as higher social value or status, etc. On and on.

I’ve read posts by men here, who go MGTOW, and suddenly the muff is in full pursuit. Have to repel them. Literally.

So it does make you question things, when you get the very same results in MGTOW. But minus the money and various techniques.

I do agree that there are some things which MGTOW and PUA do have in common. Or perhaps areas, where they intersect. But from my point of view, the best bang for your buck, is hands down with MGTOW.

PUA by its very nature is misleading and is a sales gimmick. I will try to find a really good video I saw on this subject. The guy who did it, really showed the PUA scam in its fullness.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

Ok, I did a quick search and found the video I mentioned in the last post.

I like what this guy has done in this presentation, as he exposes the PUA and self-help Guru circuit for the gimmick and scams that they are trying to run.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Eric Lauder wrote:

The counter-petition is already at 3,169 signatures against the 2,370 signatures by feminists, but I guess that at least 5,000 signatures are needed, because men are actually valued half than women.

Its over 7000 now.

Signed it.

I’m pretty sure feminists paid a huge sum to the theater.

Free speech or no speech, money always speaks louder.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

One of the commenters on Bearing’s YouTube channel said he wrote to the cinema and got this pathetic reply –

Dear Sir / Madam,

Thank you for your enquiry received by staff at the Kino cinemas.

We made the decision to cancel the screening of THE RED PILL in the absence of any judgement of the film, filmmakers, or attendees. However what was initially booked as a closed, private screening was being publicised widely and this in turn upset a significant proportion of our customers, who communicated their feelings to us directly.

Upon receiving such direct feedback we realised that irrespective of the content, its presence in one of our cinemas was offensive to a large section of our core audience and movie club members. Therefore we took the decision to cancel the screening aware that regardless of the decision we took, a significant number of people would be disgruntled: so we took the decision that we think was best for our customer base at that time.

Regards,
The Kino Cinemas

Gutless wonders, cancelling a private screening. You’d think feminists were being Shanghai’d at gunpoint and being forced to watch the film. And they wonder why the cinema industry is dying and people are flocking to Video On Demand –
.

.
And all this in a country where its universities invite advocate for the death of all men Clementine Ford to speak in public forums. The ANZAC diggers are turning in their graves wondering what the bloody hell they fought for?
.

#ManOut

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

I must say The Red Pill documentary Director and now ex-feminist Cassie Jaye holds herself well in interviews and seems to brings a level-head to the table as a documentarian. It takes a lot for a feminist who has lived Pink Pill for many years to wake up to the workings of the gynocentric matrix. In part 1 of the interview below (around the 24:14 mark), Cassie says there is support for female directors, but “you have to be on script …. The Red Pill is not in-line with the feminist agenda.”

Part 1

.
Part 2

#ManOut

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

Really great vids Oz-Bloke.

Favorite line in the 1st video, was when Cassie Jaye referred to Feminism as a Religion.

Now that is truly, something to ponder.

I see some Esther Vilar similarities, with how she is being attacked by the feminists. Speak against them, and suddenly one is all alone.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

THREAD UPDATE – The Red Pill documentary will now be screened in Melbourne at an alternate cinema.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/security-guards-hired-for-melbourne-screening-of-the-red-pill/news-story/bce6d5cff06b3526a6c37fb0ee1a6e1c

To quote the article –

“SECURITY guards will be hired to help protect attendees at a controversial men’s rights movie.

Men’s rights advocates have secured a new venue allowing The Red Pill to premier in Melbourne as planned.

Men’s Rights Melbourne spokesman David Williams said the opponents’ actions hampered free speech.

Mr Williams would not name the cinema now hosting the premier.

“We are concerned for the safety of attendees,” Mr Williams said.

The cinema had capacity for about 150 people who could buy tickets through his organisation which still needed to raise $7800 to cover extra costs and security guards.

A crowdsourcing campaign had hit $800 in the first four hours and of going online.

Mr Williams said he had contacted 42 Melbourne cinemas and venues before finding one that was available and was prepared to screen the film.

Some cinemas were already booked up but others shied away from controversy, he said.

“It’s been an exhausting time. I’m happy that we’ve found some one who agrees with us,” Mr Williams said.

Ms Jaye told the Herald Sun she was shocked that Melbourne was the only place her film had been cancelled and she was shocked so many people had signed the opposing petition when they hadn’t seen the film.”

#ManOut

[~BSParticipant 3266]

sidecar wrote:

Oz-Bloke wrote:

So a bunch of feminists have blocked the screening of a documentary on the MRA and MGTOW made by a feminist.

Do you really expect a documentary on MRAs or MGTOW made by a feminist to be in any way honest or truthful? I suspect it was just another dishonest, biased, trashy hit piece.

This is feminism consuming itself. And nothing of value was lost.

But that is not our problem.

I mentioned the below in the other thread. The fact that the documentary was made by one of their own calling into question her own feminist views is throwing feminists into a panic. It shows that other people’s eyes may be opened as well.

The betrayal they felt would be as if keymaster strapped on some t~~~ and declared that he’s a feminist, and made a movie about it.

…….

There’s a huge s~~~ storm brewing regarding this movie, and we haven’t seen the last of it. It should open a lot of people’s eyes. Feminists are fighting it tooth and claw. They tried to bribe the film maker with money to turn it into a feminist hit piece (no surprise there), but when she wouldn’t budge, pulled all promises of funding and commenced personal attacks and censorship attempts.

Attempting to block the film backfired because now they drew the ire of free speech advocates, who are a much larger body than MRAs, obviously wary of funding a film that might be used against them, FSAs gladly ponied up 200k to support the film.

The fact that it was made by a feminist, by someone who knows how to create a film (won several awards), and is known for publishing unbiased films scares feminists s~~~less. Because if she can examine these issues and realize feminism is a sham, others will as well.

"He didn't marry until now, so he won't ever do it. Think about it, why would a man like him ever marry? It's too late to catch him. " ~some cunt

[Solid SnakeParticipant 255]

You know what makes me laugh?

The ONLY reason I know about this movie was that it came up in the news about the documentary being pulled from cinemas.

So they’ve just made more people aware about it, and now curiosity is going to get the better of us and we’re going to watch it 😀

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

THREAD UPDATE – Bettina Arndt of the The Australian has penned one of the better articles covering the release of The Red Pill in Australia in her article;

Cassie Jaye’s Red Pill too truthful for feminists to tolerate

To quote the article;

“Clearly this documentary has the feminists very worried — with good reason. Cassie Jaye is an articulate, 29-year-old blonde whose previous movies on gay marriage and abstinence education won multiple awards. But then she decided to interview leaders of the Men’s Rights Movement for a documentary she was planning about rape culture on American campuses. As a committed feminist, Jaye expected to be unimpressed by these renowned hate-filled misogynists, but to her surprise she was exposed to a whole range of issues she came to see as unfairly stacked against men and boys.

As news of this very public conversion started to leak out, Jaye came under attack. She was smeared, told she was committing “career suicide” and saw her funding dry up to the point where it looked as if the movie would never be made. Prominent feminists she had planned to interview refused to participate; none of the “human rights” funding she hoped to attract proved available for a documentary on men’s rights.

There’s a powerful interview with Erin Pizzey, who is no longer allowed near the British women’s refuge she started back in the 1970s, the first in the world. Pizzey ran afoul of the sisterhood by campaigning to expose the truth about women’s role in domestic violence.

Stephen Marche in The Guardian admits that “men do sometimes suffer mistreatment from the courts or from the women in their lives”, but suggests the film fails to demonstrate any systemic cause. “Instead, the author of men’s troubles here is always that vague bugaboo feminism, which we’re told is designed to silence its opponents,” sniffs Marche.

That’s pretty ironic, given this “vague bugaboo” persists in trying to silence Jaye’s attempts to tell this story. As she points out in her movie, the issues she examines came as a revelation not only to her but to many others exposed to the material she put together. That bugaboo carries a lot of clout.”
.

.

The more than 320 comments in the article’s comments section reflect how men are finally finding their voices and are willing to call the feminist movement out on all their bulls~~~. When one group (feminists) tries to silence another (men), it speaks volumes about who the real ‘oppressors’ are in our society. And given 60% of all women consider themselves ‘feminists’, that’s a large chunk of the population who oppose the men’s rights messages being heard.
.

#ManOut

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Facts, statistics, logic, common sense and countless stories of the collective experience of men.

All feminist/female kryptonite.

https://goo.gl/images/nggZa3

F~~~ this iPad…… $&@!#%

Fuck this planet.

[Author]

Posts