Feminists saying they can do whatever they want with their body

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Torchem wrote:

The law must get changed that if she wants it and the dad doesn’t, she forgoes any child support. She doesn’t and the dad does, she hands it to the dad straight after birth.

Lol…I got kicked off a liberal forum not too long ago for proposing a similar argument. Only different thing is I don’t think men should be able to give up responsibility for their child simply because it places an extra burden on tax payers…simply put I don’t want to pay for some other guys kid just because he doesn’t want to.

Basically, I think if the mom wants it and the dad doesn’t, he should have to pay child support, and if the dad wants it and the mom doesn’t she should get the same treatment the guy gets…he gets primary custody and she has to pay him child support. Its along the same lines of what you say, but rather than let one parent off the hook when only the other parent wants the kid, I think both parents should be on the hook as long as one parent wants it…basically what happens to men now should also happen to women.

Of course they all come back with “Her body her choice” bulls~~~…to which my reply was “This is precisely why I am pro life, it is the only way to ensure reproductive equality. I’d rather see 100 women have to deal with a whoops baby than 1 loving father have his child aborted while he is powerless in the decision.”

I also asked why if I kick a pregnant woman in the stomach I can be charged with assault and murder, yet that same woman can get an abortion and its totally legal.

Again like I said…their response was to ban me lol. Abortion has always been a non-issue for me simply because its not something I ever had to worry about, but after seeing the reaction on that forum candidates I will vote for in the future will get bonus points for being pro life for the simple reason of I’m tired of seeing women get the pussy pass while men are forced to suck it up and pay 18 years of child support.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

As the saying goes, “Prevention is better than cure.” Don’t wanna get into this mess? Don’t f~~~ them. No sex = no children = no mess.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[TorchemParticipant 453]

Beer wrote:

Torchem wrote:

The law must get changed that if she wants it and the dad doesn’t, she forgoes any child support. She doesn’t and the dad does, she hands it to the dad straight after birth.

Lol…I got kicked off a liberal forum not too long ago for proposing a similar argument. Only different thing is I don’t think men should be able to give up responsibility for their child simply because it places an extra burden on tax payers…simply put I don’t want to pay for some other guys kid just because he doesn’t want to.

Basically, I think if the mom wants it and the dad doesn’t, he should have to pay child support, and if the dad wants it and the mom doesn’t she should get the same treatment the guy gets…he gets primary custody and she has to pay him child support. Its along the same lines of what you say, but rather than let one parent off the hook when only the other parent wants the kid, I think both parents should be on the hook as long as one parent wants it…basically what happens to men now should also happen to women.

Of course they all come back with “Her body her choice” bulls~~~…to which my reply was “This is precisely why I am pro life, it is the only way to ensure reproductive equality. I’d rather see 100 women have to deal with a whoops baby than 1 loving father have his child aborted while he is powerless in the decision.”

I also asked why if I kick a pregnant woman in the stomach I can be charged with assault and murder, yet that same woman can get an abortion and its totally legal.

Again like I said…their response was to ban me lol. Abortion has always been a non-issue for me simply because its not something I ever had to worry about, but after seeing the reaction on that forum candidates I will vote for in the future will get bonus points for being pro life for the simple reason of I’m tired of seeing women get the pussy pass while men are forced to suck it up and pay 18 years of child support.

So, basically you support these tramps pumping out kids. If they didn’t get cash and prizes for unwanted children, don’t you think these “accidents” will stop? The welfare system cancers will be cut out of the system, our jails not so full of single mothers grown up children, more money for our governments to spend the money better else where etc etc. I’ve had a vasectomy so no “accidents” caused by me, but still wear a condom so not to catch STD’s.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

If she goes on welfare her “child support” comes from the public coffers

This, in my opinion, is the end result of that old “it takes a village to raise a child” bulls~~~.
To me, it seems to absolve a woman of responsibility, and places the responsibility on the rest of the community via guilt. While denying the father the choice or ability to raise his child.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Author]

Posts