Female SJW loses it over confederate flag, needs her safe space

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

IRuleMe wrote:

facebook link

Nope.

Got a better link?

[IRuleMeParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

IRuleMe wrote:

facebook link

Nope.

Got a better link?

Was just posted on youtube

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

IRuleMe wrote:

Was just posted on youtube

Thanks for that link.

Bitch needs to get over herself. That car doesn’t represent oppression. It represents a rather tedious 1970s television show with the exact same stunts in every single episode. Set in the magical fantasy land of Hazzard County which, while supposedly the Deep South, looks suspiciously like the thirty mile zone around Los Angeles, where all the rednecks somehow have all their own teeth.

That’s not offensive. It’s just lame. What sort of person would allow herself to be “oppressed” by that?

That being said, this is one of the funniest things ever:

[qeeqoParticipant 1168]

I listened to a YouTube clip of a man talking about the civil war who was actually in it. He remembered them lowering the flag to half mast when Lincoln died.

He said as a person who fought for the confederacy that it was about States rights and not about keeping slavery.

It makes my blood boil when these c~~~s bring up being a white male. The last time an SJW told me to “check my privilege” to my face I said, “my privilege is just fine as it is, and frankly, is none of your God damned business.”

The utter contempt that dripped out of that beasts mouth about being a “white male” is one of the reason’s I don’t engage these feral creatures except at work and telling them whether I want paper or plastic.

[Anonymous 11]

sidecar wrote:

while supposedly the Deep South, looks suspiciously like the thirty mile zone around Los Angeles,

Some of the initial episodes of season one were filmed in Georgia. I believe it was the first six. The difference is quite obvious.

The show is an insult to the State, but it is funny.

[SwimcatParticipant 3593]

qeeqo wrote:

I listened to a YouTube clip of a man talking about the civil war who was actually in it. He remembered them lowering the flag to half mast when Lincoln died.

He said as a person who fought for the confederacy that it was about States rights and not about keeping slavery.

It makes my blood boil when these c~~~s bring up being a white male. The last time an SJW told me to “check my privilege” to my face I said, “my privilege is just fine as it is, and frankly, is none of your God damned business.”

The utter contempt that dripped out of that beasts mouth about being a “white male” is one of the reason’s I don’t engage these feral creatures except at work and telling them whether I want paper or plastic.

And they wonder why so many black men will have nothing to do with them. I work in an office full of black women. I politely smile and then stare off into space.

[OldBillParticipant]

qeeqo wrote:

He said as a person who fought for the confederacy that it was about States rights and not about keeping slavery.

Again, let me recommend The Confederate Reader. What an elderly man filmed in the 1930s may “remember” about the first half of the 1860s isn’t exactly trustworthy.

Like any good lie, the “It was for states’ rights only” apologia concocted after the war contains a kernel of truth. While the southern states did cite the concept, they wanted to the concept to apply only when it suited them – just like how women now want chivalry and equality to apply only when it suits them.

In fact, with a level of hypocrisy usually only seen in women, the southern states actually argued against state’s rights in their secession ordinances. They cited the northern states’ assertion of the states’ right to ignore the Federal Fugitive Slave Act as one reason for their secession only to claim later on it was a defense of states’ rights which led them to start the war.

The primary documents show, contrary to the later apologia, myths, and memories of elderly men, that the states’ rights excuse only became prominent in the 1890s.

As for slavery, it is specifically mentioned in each and every secession ordinance. All contain language similar to Mississippi’s ordinance which badly states “Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery―the greatest material interest of the world.”

In 1861, the people in question flatly said that slavery was the cause of the secession. What they claimed later is of no consequence.

Lee, the “Stars and Bars”, and all the rest are part of our history and should be remembered for what they truly were. Sadly, you can see how we as a nation barely know the truth of what they symbolized now. Tossing them all down the memory hole as the leftists and SJWs want would only complete the cynical historical revisionism which began after the war and which has continued to this day.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[AutoliteParticipant]

For anyone interested in collecting diecast models, prices on the “original” General Lee are likely to sky rocket…

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

OldBill wrote:

What an elderly man filmed in the 1930s may “remember” about the first half of the 1860s isn’t exactly trustworthy.

Except what he remembered as his reason likely wasn’t the same reason as the southern elites who instigated or even documented the whole fiasco.

I highly doubt the elderly man @qeeqo mentioned was one of the southern generals or officers or politicians cited in the histories of the time. It’s much more likely he was one of the poor dumb redneck dirt farming chumps the southern elites scammed into spilling his blood for them. He likely had no slaves, would never have slaves, was far too poor to even dream of having slaves, and was kept in poverty by slavery artificially depressing wages. Slavery was a non issue for him. He wasn’t going to fight for the rich f~~~ers to keep their slaves. But he could be tricked into fighting for ‘states rights’ and his own supposed self determination. Those were very real things for him, even if they were just hypotheticals and excuses for the hypocritical elites.

[Author]

Posts