Elon Musk Says We Are Living In Simulation

[Anonymous 7]

“1 to a billion we are not in a simulation” says Musk.

a.k.a the tesla guy

Read
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/276847
Watch

[sidecarParticipant 35854]

You mean the idiot who keeps getting married including going back to a woman who’s taken him to the cleaners once already?

The f~~~ cares what he has to say?

[The Batman 2020Participant 2112]

It’s not a simulation, it’s a dream

Your 20's are for learning, your 30's are for earning.

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

The player’s score xp is called entropy, the more entropy, the higher the challenge rating , aka level difficulty, so everything get’s more and more and more chaotic.

At least the more entropy you have , more skill points you can purchase for your abilities.

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

If quantum physics calculations are correct, it is assumed that life may exist in two D
on the surface of black holes. In essence a replay of what we all were.

That would be a perfect antidote and vaccine against gynocentricity.

Zero Tolerance

[Anonymous 6]

[RhettParticipant 637]

Davidicke.com ???

Single guys come home, look at what’s in the fridge, and go to bed. Married guys come home, look at what’s in bed, and go to the fridge.......But the best representative of MGTOW is…………… an empty chair,.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Musk should check for polyps while his head is up his ass.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Anonymous 7]

sidecar wrote:

You mean the idiot who keeps getting married including going back to a woman who’s taken him to the cleaners once already?

The f~~~ cares what he has to say?

Yeah just the idiot who landed a rocket on a drone barge who knows more about science than you ever could fathom.

He could give two s~~~s about the millions hes lost in divorce to the billions he owns.

Thats something a feminist would do. Disparage your accomplishments for your personal desicions.

[sidecarParticipant 35854]

Anonymous wrote:

Yeah just the idiot who landed a rocket on a drone barge who knows more about science than you ever could fathom.

You don’t know me. And if you did you’d be embarrassed by making that statement.

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

I used to like this guy, as I used to like democrats and as I used to like women.
And then I grew up.
They’re all selling utopia in one form or another. But they all have Big Government in common.
As for the simulation part, his premises for calculating the 1 to billions odds are questionable.

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[Anonymous 7]

sidecar wrote:

You don’t know me. And if you did you’d be embarrassed by making that statement.

I would think a scientist would give merit to a differing idea and explain his differing ideology rather than brush it off because of who hes married.

And I would not be embarrassed because I dont give a f~~~

[Anonymous 7]

He is blue pill as f~~~ but Im setting that aside.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Anonymous wrote:

“1 to a billion we are not in a simulation” says Musk.

a.k.a the tesla guy

Read
https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/276847
Watch
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/2KK_kzrJPS8?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Ugh, he is a poor ambassador of a scientific idea that simply is an attempt to describe some astrophysics paradox of destruction/annihilation of matter in a black hole while keeping the information.

He needs to shut up. Its like saying there is a 1 in a billion chance that electrons or smaller particles’ state can’t be known unless they are observed.

Not only is it outdated, but its probably wrong. (well not really, its just complicated)

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I think that dichotomy of simulation vs. reality is a false one. Even if it’s a “simulation” in a literal sense of this word, an elaborate simulation of such a grand scale is not much different from a “reality” in a literal sense of this word. Because if we live in the simulation – chances are that we won’t ever be able to learn or understand what’s outside of the said simulation

I do understand why some people think the reality as we experience it has some features that are very suspicious and remind of a simulation – like discovery that nothing material is analogue and can be reduced to an integer number – multiples of the planck constant – it’s almost like you can break down an image to individual pixels on a screen. Also the notion that an observation has an effect on observable (supposedly objective) processes – is a spooky thing to consider. Quantum entanglement is a very freaky thing also

I do, however, doubt that a simulation anywhere close to the one we’re experiencing now can be implemented to be convincing enough.

“Existenz” – is very interesting movie on this subject – I recommend you watch it if you’re a gamer or interested in VR

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[pabsawakeParticipant 1761]

Can’t say it better than sidecar!

"You can either love women or understand them, you can't do both". Truth over everything

[MadmanParticipant 772]

Space X and their water landing rockets are a hoax if you ask me. Its all CGI fakery.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Madman wrote:

Space X and their water landing rockets are a hoax if you ask me. Its all CGI fakery.

You can’t be serious. All of this video is CGI then?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Dr. SableParticipant 1064]

Anonymous wrote:

I would think a scientist would give merit to a differing idea and explain his differing ideology rather than brush it off because of who hes married.

I agree. We all have character flaws of one sort or another to some degree.
Regardless of his poor choice of women he is embodiment of how and what men do and what they create.
Pay-pal was not a woman’s idea nor was it realized by one just to start with.
We don’t kill our pet dogs just because they may have a lame leg.

Zero Tolerance

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8286]

If this is a simulation, it must be the world’s first PERFECT computer program. No glitches or error messages here. Maybe no one’s found the source code yet—-whoever does could just program us out of existence or turn our reality into an acid trip.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Author]

Posts