Does Atheistic secularism really promote violence?

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

How do you know that, where is your evidence?

“Two possiblities exist: either the Universe is finite and has a size, or it’s infinite and goes on forever. Both possibilities have mind-bending implications.”

Is the Universe Finite or Infinite?

It’s not my claim. It’s what science claims as one of a few possibilities. But in truth, they don’t even know.

I stated that science does not know the origin of the universe. You accept their not knowing, but take issue with my pointing out the very same?

Arguing for arguments sake? That’s productive. And intelligent.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

I didn’t read your post, I bet you posted….

That’s logical.

Here, you have a go, what affront to reason have you committed here?

[X11Spectator 4520]

My affront to reason is hoping you will actually post your beliefs and show your evidence for them.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

LOGICAL FALLACIES:

Ad hominem

Appeal to ridicule (also called appeal to mockery), is an informal fallacy which presents an opponent’s argument as absurd, ridiculous, or humorous, and therefore not worth consideration.

Brilliant post Cú Chulainn. Let’s see the troll twist his way out of these.

Cú Chulainn wrote:

Ad hominem, appeals to spite, ridicule. Poisoning the well.

I knew there was a logical reason for why I disliked him. My conclusions were sound. But these explanations are way more concise.

I’m beginning to appreciate science in a whole new light! 🙂

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

My affront to reason is hoping you will actually post your beliefs and show your evidence for them.

You’re not intelligent or stable enough to discuss my spiritual beliefs honestly. I’m afraid you’ll get triggered and either threaten to knock me out in under ten seconds, or, insert your penis into my ear.

Two instances documented on this forum of where your intellect is not up to my standards of good behaviour and mutual respect.

You’re challenged.

[X11Spectator 4520]

Wait a moment you stated;

Stentorian wrote:

Of course. The universe is infinite.

and that

Stentorian wrote:

science itself is not an authority when it comes to matters on a universal and infinite scale.

But now quote science to support your claim that you said above science that is incapable of.

Do you withdraw your claim that the universe is infinite now???

You seem to be all over the place.

[X11Spectator 4520]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

You’re not intelligent or stable enough to discuss my spiritual beliefs honestly.

Cú Chulainn wrote:

You’re challenged.

Genetic blah blah fallacy, ad hominem blah, blah, blah.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

My affront to reason is hoping you will actually post your beliefs and show your evidence for them.

Oh how you tuck tail and run, when pressed with truth and logic.

You can’t argue with him or debate him on equal ground. So you drop several levels. Way down low. Just as I pointed out earlier. And just stoop to sneering and base remarks.

Cowardly and weak. Try growing a set, and actually facing what Chulain has put in front of you.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

X11 wrote:

Cú Chulainn wrote:

You’re not intelligent or stable enough to discuss my spiritual beliefs honestly.

Cú Chulainn wrote:

You’re challenged.

Genetic blah blah fallacy, ad hominem blah, blah, blah.

QED.

You’re now descending into gibberish so as not to lose face.

[X11Spectator 4520]

@stenyorian, you going to address this mess of unclear thinking or just change the subject because your white knight came along?

X11 wrote:

Wait a moment you stated;

Stentorian wrote:

Of course. The universe is infinite.

and that

Stentorian wrote:

science itself is not an authority when it comes to matters on a universal and infinite scale.

But now quote science to support your claim that you said above science that is incapable of.

Do you withdraw your claim that the universe is infinite now???

You seem to be all over the place.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

Genetic blah blah fallacy, ad hominem blah, blah, blah.

Generic. Not genetic. And it’s not blah blah blah. It’s literally the refuse you use spew, in almost every post.

He’s shining a light directly on your bulls~~~. Can’t weasel out now.

He’s identified every form of fallacy you employ. And the best you can respond with is blah blah blah?

Weak. Very. Very weak.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

Cú Chulainn wrote:

QED.

You’re now descending into gibberish so as not to lose face.

Precisely.

So obvious and transparent.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[X11Spectator 4520]

Stentorian wrote:

You can’t argue with him or debate him on equal ground.

I keep asking him to debate but he is to chicken s~~~ because reason given ad hominem.

[X11Spectator 4520]

OK you going to ignore this mess then.

So lol you have to change the subject since I posted it.

X11 wrote:

Wait a moment you stated;

Stentorian wrote:

Of course. The universe is infinite.

and that

Stentorian wrote:

science itself is not an authority when it comes to matters on a universal and infinite scale.

But now quote science to support your claim that you said above science that is incapable of.

Do you withdraw your claim that the universe is infinite now???

You seem to be all over the place.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

@stenyorian, you going to address this mess of unclear thinking or just change the subject because your white knight came along?

Why should I address anything? By your example. I can just say things, and shimmy away.

He’s not my white knight. Chulain has brought forward the clinical terms for what I already spotted and pegged you as. Going on 2-3 days now.

Now his approach and his material is far more elegant than what I threw your way. But my conclusions, are solid. And this is based solely on your weak puerile behavior and trolling.

I think you get the point. Remember when I said people can see you for what you are? This is what I was alluding to.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

I’m a chicken s~~~ white knight in under two posts. Guess I’m hitting a nerve somewhere.

Irrelevancies to what is being discussed, and coming from X11 its par for the course. The difference now to when I first joined the forum is that its amusing me instead of annoying me.

[X11Spectator 4520]

OK its settled, you are both too chicken s~~~ to debate me about the topic under discussion and both want to change the subject to personal attacks.

Clearly you both fail but here as a consolation prize you can use this on each other all night long.

Get back to me when you want to discuss your beliefs.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

I keep asking him to debate but he is to chicken s~~~ because reason given ad hominem.

You’re still deflecting and stalling. How about putting that inflatable intellect of yours to the test, and actually address his post. He has pointed out several areas to which you are still scurrying from.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

X11 wrote:

Get back to me when you want to discuss your beliefs.

Sure. My belief is that you run every time someone calls out your bulls~~~. Based on the last 2-3 days.

This thread is filled with examples where you tuck tail and run.

Try addressing what he has put forward.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[X11Spectator 4520]

Try not changing the subject, the debate was about your beliefs.

[Author]

Posts