Dating easy for women? Not so fast!

[BeerParticipant 11832]

ValleyFever101 wrote:

bigboy83 wrote:

There was even a man, left 20 minutes into the date, lol.

I wondered about that while reading the article. There’s something she’s not telling.

I just assumed she was a land whale posting all face shots and one body shot that was several years old.  The guy probably showed up and when he realized he was tricked trolled her for a few minutes then made his escape.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

You guys are a bunch of ass holes.  The picture is real.  It says right under it (picture provided).  Okay, so it’s six years old and 50 lbs lighter.  But I’m still a fantastic catch despite my two brats.  I’m not a Troll.  Don’t you dare hit the “T~~~ Button”

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Robert Hallam wrote:

Wont Get Fooled Again Well you old sea biscuit. Where have you been? Sort of missed your input but maybe you were on holiday. Well you have first hand knowledge of what I speak. It looks to me that she had to settle for something quite a bit less rather than an upgrade. I’m assuming (but it is probably a pretty good guess) that she’s resigned to the fact that “He’ll have to do I guess; there was no guarantee that I could have found something better.” and she will have to look at this dork the rest of her life. Yeah, she probably got used by a few guys who weren’t into commitment, and knew she was being used in a series of unsatisfying relationships. But what gets me Wont Get Fooled Again is her observation early on to you about another couple she knows where they got back together after 2 years of separation. I agree, I think it was a fantasy of hers and she may very well still harbour it. I guess the day the realization set in for her was the day your divorce was final, and you stood your ground. The part that makes me shake my head is her point that they realized how much they loved each other. Man that part makes me sick. I just couldn’t abide by a pussy whipped piece of s~~~ that reconciles with a wayward wife.

I am good thank you, I still check the forum every day but I only post on the topics where I feel my personal experience can add something.  Anyway, I have been working in Australia so I haven’t actually seen her for about 7 months or so.  The Decree Absolute was granted 2 weeks ago and I got a message from her saying how sad it made her and how she had been looking at the wedding album.  She also mentioned that she wants me to take her out to dinner as we have a lot of things to discuss and that she misses me.

I then find out that the Blue pill man she has been seeing has moved into the house permanently now and they are having a £40,000 loft conversion done so that his children can stay there as well.  She claims she has taken a loan out for this money but there is no way she could borrow this much money on her salary, so I think she has convinced him to spend £40,000 of his divorce settlement on a house that he has zero legal entitlement too.

So I don’t really know what her game is, on the one hand she is telling me how sad she is and how much she misses me and on the other hand she has moved this dude in and pursuaded him to spend £40K on a house that isn’t even his.

Shortly before we split she did the whole gym thing, lost loads of weight, bought loads of new clothes and everyone told her how great she looked.  I honestly thought she took one look at me and was convinced she could do better.   Obviously her weight loss was only temporary and she has put it all on and is now nearly 38 and starting to look old and stressed.   She knows I am seeing a woman who is not only younger than her but a damn sight hotter which is clearly not what she thought would happen.

She has clearly settled for this guy as she can’t handle being on her own and if she got rid of me that easily then I am certain she will be looking around for better offers.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

A divorced single mother (of TWO!!!) says she’s “old fashioned” and too picky? MGTOW comedy GOLD!

Someone once told me that I should lower my standards when looking to find a mate. Well, if that were the case, I would have stayed married.

You SHOULD have stayed married if you had any f~~~ing old-fashioned “standards”. AFTER you ditched your husband, you don’t go “looking for a mate” as a divorced single mother and wonder why you keep coming up empty-handed. A man’s standards whopped have to be at BARREL-SCRAPING LOWS to date you at all.

How these t~~~s carry on like they are some kind of a catch is unreal.
And we all know whether are no comments permitted. So does she.

Someone send her this: http://mgtow.com/good-man-locator/

We created it for dumb bitches just like that.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[I_Walk_AloneParticipant 580]

As always:

Fat, with no intention of doing anything about it.

Tattoos.

Kids from a previous relationship – or multiple kids from previous relationships.

Anyone who has used online dating can also add her mountain of debt to the mix.

The usual – 0verweight and tattooed with a mountain of baggage and debt, yet they feel that they are 100% entitled to a 6ft+, facially aesthetic, muscular hunk who hits the gym regularly, with a bank balance akin to Donald Trump, a Ferrari encrusted with diamonds, and no kids – yet he must be giddy with excitement at the thought of paying to raise several other men’s.

O where have all the good men gone? Why WOULDN’T a fit, athletic, rich and successful man want to date Honey Boo-boo’s mom?

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

Single Mom = Strike One

Visible Tattoo = Strike Two

Butterface = Strike Three

Who are these fools that waste time even meeting her?

Sovereignty above all else.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

Won’t Get Fooled Again

I’m not a believer but it seems to me that there is a smell of Karma around.  So the grass ain’t exactly greener on the other side.  Who would have guessed?  Sounds too little like there’s “trouble in paradise coming down the road” what with new hubby moving in along with two sons no less.   The reason I say this is because I find it strange that an ex, as in your case, is telling you she is sad, is looking at the wedding album, misses you, has a lot to discuss, and suggests getting together over coffee.  How long do you think it will take for her to feel like she is being taken advantage of?  And how long will she stifle it?  If you wanted to be a bastard (of the mild kind) I’d take her up on her suggested dinner date but you should be armed with a load of pictures of you together with your current squeeze, on holiday in the Bahamas.  And if you wanted to be a bastard (of the rotten kind) it wouldn’t hurt for you to send an e-mail to her (he hopefully will see) that says “I’m sorry to hear that finalizing the divorce saddened you and of course I appreciate the fact that you miss me, after all we were together for a decade.”  “l’ll call you when I get back and arrange to get together over dinner or something.  Then we can talk about all the things you wanted to discuss.”

Of course I could be way off base.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

I saw another article on FOXnews today.  It confirms what other articles are confirming, if a woman is not married by early-30’s then she has hit the “marriage wall”.  Past that age the number of men who want to get married plummets, and the ones still hanging around are poor marriage material.

If 30 is “The Wall”, then I am calling 33 “The Cliff”!

Sovereignty above all else.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Knights Templar Rising wrote:

I saw another article on FOXnews today. It confirms what other articles are confirming, if a woman is not married by early-30’s then she has hit the “marriage wall”. Past that age the number of men who want to get married plummets, and the ones still hanging around are poor marriage material. If 30 is “The Wall”, then I am calling 33 “The Cliff”!

Its because she has wasted a decade riding the carousel and creating a truck load of baggage while men who are unmarried by 30 have probably seen the system for what it is and have no intentions of marrying, and if they did they’d rather find a younger woman with less mileage/baggage.

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

Knights Templar Rising wrote:

I saw another article on FOXnews today. It confirms what other articles are confirming, if a woman is not married by early-30’s then she has hit the “marriage wall”. Past that age the number of men who want to get married plummets, and the ones still hanging around are poor marriage material. If 30 is “The Wall”, then I am calling 33 “The Cliff”!

I work with your typical early 30’s woman who has spent her 20’s riding the carousel.  She is now 32, is somewhere between a 7 and an 8 looks wise and has your typical gym bunny body.  She drives a convertable car (on finance obviously) and spends all her available money going out with her female friends and going on holiday skiing or to Ibiza.  Basically she is the poster girl for the 20’s c~~~ carousel.

But she is now talking about having kids and settling down which I was quite surprised about.  I think she realises the wall is just starting to happen but I think she is a little bit in denial as she is still trying to stay on the carousel and hold on to her party lifestyle at the moment.  I wonder if women think the wall happens later and so slowly that they can easily get away with staying on the carousel until 35/36 and they will still be fertile enough to squeeze out a couple of kids before 40?

She has been bought up to believe that once she is done with the carousel the perfect guy will just come along but I think she is starting to come to the conclusion that this might not happen.  Her sister is married to a rich Alpha male so this probably makes her think that she is entitled to one too. Trouble is, so far none of the Alphas she has been f~~~ing want to put a ring on it so she has a difficult choice to make.  Does she stay with the Alphas and hope one will marry her but risk becoming an Alpha widow or does she marry a Beta knowing damn well that she will never love him and end up divorcing him once she is 40?

Then if she divorces him she runs the risk of never finding someone better and actually settling for someone worse.  If only those Alphas would man up and marry them in their 20’s, women would be a lot happier!

 

 

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Its such a disconnect going on with men and women like that.  Basically they have three types of guys…the ones that just want to pump and dump, the ones that want to wife them, and MGTOW.  Guys looking for a pump and dump aren’t interested long term, MGTOW aren’t interested long term if they have any interest, and the guys who do want a woman to wife aren’t really looking at a 30+ year olds that have seen more than their share of c~~~s.

They’ll whine about how you shouldn’t judge based on how many partners they’ve had, their past, and all that kind of crap…but at the end of the day they are getting judged on that.  Its like someone who has been convicted on embezzlement multiple times trying to get a job as an accountant and telling potential employers don’t worry about his past.  Its not up to them to set forth the criteria to be judged on…its up to the person planning on having a relationship with them to set their own criteria.  Maybe another 10 or 20 years down the road young women will be smart enough to look at the army of 30-50 year old bitter, never wed crazy cat women and learn from their mistakes, or maybe not, either way my generation is already f~~~ed up and I’ll be too old to care by then.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Beer wrote:

MGTOW aren’t interested long term if they have any interest,

I don’t think it’s a matter of timespan so much as depth of involvement. F~~~ing the same woman occasionally over a long time span without ever dating, cohabiting, spawning children, marrying or or doing any other such impediment to freedom or happiness is still long term. It’s what women would generally call “shallow” or “meaningless”, by which they of course mean it doesn’t materially benefit the woman, but what of it?

[Author]

Posts