Canada's new bachelor tax courtesy of PM Justin Trudeau

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

http://www.cbc.ca/news/business/canada-child-benefit-social-safety-net-baby-bonus-childcare-justin-trudeau-social-assistance-1.3685290
“This is an initiative that’s going to help Canadian families in a significant measure,” Prime Minister Justin Trudeau told the CBC’s Rosemary Barton in an interview Wednesday, and noted it is a “more generous and tax free” system than its predecessor, he said later at a press conference.
But it’s pricey: the benefit is expected to cost $22.4 billion over five years. It also won’t be indexed to inflation until 2020.
Still, the vast majority of Canadian families will see a boost to their bottom line.

“At the end of the day, based on the models we have looked at and based on what the government has said, about 90 per cent of families that have kids under the age of 18 will actually have more money than they did under the old system,” says Jamie Golombek, managing director of tax and estate planning for CIBC Wealth Strategies Group.

[GrumpyParticipant]

S~~~ like this is why Canadian Veterans have to fight so f~~~ing hard to get treatment, or medical pensions for injuries sustained while serving.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

There’s going to be revolts in Canada, just like their was in Turkey.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Anonymous 42]

The social engineers are going to tweek this wreck all the way to the scrap yard of socialism.

“Help Canada’s families”. What families? Single mommy households subsidized by everyone else?

More and more and more for the already plump and fattened princess?

Adios C~~~ada, off to the junkyard of feminism!

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

Zuberi Tau, when you put out “bachelor tax”, I actually thought you meant bachelor tax like the type that I posted about in the past where they would force all the bachelors to pay a fee to try to put them in a corner to get them to get married and then that is it. If my fears were actually true, I would of really have lost it since I live in Canada and all. If Justin Trudeau starts raising the tax rates that is in the low end of the tax bracket as well as giving low income families a tax break at the same time though, that would make Justin Trudeau a sneaky little a**hole mangina wouldn’t it?

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22520]

This guy is like the jelly of the month club. (Christmas Vacation joke)

[TuneoutParticipant]

I read the article and this example of a single mother has four,thats right,four f~~~ing kids,lives in subsidized housing and makes only 30k/yr.
My first thought is,can’t you keep your legs closed?
If not have you heard of birth control?
So now it’s our job to lift your lil bastards out of poverty according to Justin while running our debt up.
You know we have another national embarrassment who’s first name is Justin and makes all the young girls wet.
Canada is turning into a real life Ghostbuster’s.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

Zuberi Tau, when you put out “bachelor tax”, I actually thought you meant bachelor tax

Aren’t all taxes essentially bachelor taxes though? Men get raped out the ass for taxes, especially if they’re single like me, which is a pretty f~~~ing raw deal.

Then, all your tax money goes to single fat land whales to subsidized their Chad’s kids.

This is why if we must have taxes to begin with, I prefer a flat tax rate or a low tax rate at the very least.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

WTF Four f~~~ing children? Four mistakes? LOL

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[HitmanParticipant]

steal from the working class and give to the irresponsible t~~~s.
it just encourages them in their behaviors.
the state is the father now.
our money for their kids…
criminal.

[FaxmodemParticipant 1415]

I am Canadian tax payer, why the hell should my taxes go to mothers who are irresponsible t~~~s and make me pay when I don’t ever want to get married or have kids. And I have been called selfish for not wanting those why these same mothers. It’s Bulls~~~.

Us men didn't start the battle of the sexes, but we're clearly going to win it via the simple tactic of just leaving the battlefield in contempt."

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

I actually thought you meant bachelor tax like the type that I posted about in the past where they would force all the bachelors to pay a fee to try to put them in a corner to get them to get married and then that is it.

Hold your horses,this is only phase 1. They will not put knee jerk policy in place in fear of rebelling,it has to be inserted slowly like a nurse inserting a needle. Men are not getting married,birth rates are dropping, and women are f~~~ing so who do you think will eventually have to pay for these mistakes…women?

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[ConstantineParticipant 4416]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

Zuberi Tau, when you put out “bachelor tax”, I actually thought you meant bachelor tax like the type that I posted about in the past where they would force all the bachelors to pay a fee to try to put them in a corner to get them to get married and then that is it.

Same here. Relieved to hear that it hasn’t quite come to that yet. But if any country is going to go that far, wouldn’t surprise me if Canada goes first. That’ll probably be next for Trudeau. The guy’s just a giant walking cooch.

Well, not even giant really.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Anonymous 25]

Well seeing as more and more men are going mgtow and downsizing and not chasing high income jobs and not spending money on luxury items like cars to impress women, that means less money for the tax man to spend.

I’m looking forward to seeing the austerity programmes bite when they realise the budget deficit handouts for women has created.

[aeragoanParticipant 1186]

i hope Canada will be bankrupt soon for the sake of my mgtow brothers..

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

Canada Filing for Bankrupcy?
Nothing 12 years of Trudeau big goverment spending policy can not achieve.

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Anonymous wrote:

Well seeing as more and more men are going mgtow and downsizing and not chasing high income jobs and not spending money on luxury items like cars to impress women, that means less money for the tax man to spend.

Its the only cure for this f~~~ed up system. The government gets f~~~ed three times as more men do this. First because it gets more expensive to support more government dependent women, second because having a lower life time earnings means men will pay less taxes, and third we’ll own less s~~~ for them to tax so again less taxes for the government.

They are literally creating a system where they need more money than ever and we have less incentive than ever to work for it lol.

[OldBillParticipant]

As Margaret Thatcher once observed, “The problem with socialism is that sooner or later you run out of other people’s money.”

And, as the Marxist social engineers who have purposely destroyed the social fabric Western Civilization fully understand and will never publicly admit, you always get what you provide incentives for.

Providing more benefits for single mothers will only result in more single mothers claiming more benefits.

The worthless piece of s~~~ featured in the linked article is precisely what our masters want to turn every citizen into; a placid subservient thrall wholly dependent on continual government assistance and wholly comfortable with continual government intervention.

Her job in “social services” is nothing but government mandated busy work in which she “helps” other government subsidized worthless pieces of s~~~ like herself remain slaves in all but name. She’s s~~~ out four more future thralls from as many men and, because the government provides monetary incentives not to marry and to drive those men away, she’s “raising” the next generation of dysfunctional adults, felons, and single mothers the government will then be “forced” to both monitor and assist.

More importantly and like any good domesticated animal, she can be counted on to support those politicians who promise to keep her feed bag full at the expense of others.

This system, naturally, is unsustainable. However, that is exactly what the Left wants. While we MGTOWs may talk occasionally about letting it all burn down, the Left cannot wait for that day which they call Year Zero because they believe they’ll be the ones left standing and that they’ll be the ones who will fashion the future.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

I must have gotten up on the left this morning because I can’t see a major issue with this. More money for kids and the poor will indeed stimulate the economy – the poor spend, the rich invest or send money offshore – which will then lead later to enough money for politicians to promise tax cuts, which both sides will do to get elected. A bizarre circular argument, but no worse (I would say better) than the right-wing attitude of “support corporations and the rich, it will trickle down” which has historically failed about as often as socialism has.

Yes this will encourage single mothers, but the alternative – don’t give welfare – will disadvantage the kids and lead to the single mums using their kids as either beggars or thieves. I don’t want to walk the streets with a horde of Artful Dodgers eyeing my pockets. (Not that I’m in Canada anyway). This assumes the mums aren’t just blaming the kids for their own failings and beating them, or shacking up with child abusers to get a free ride for themselves. I’d rather those kids had a chance to grow up and discover MGTOW.

Anthony wrote:

Aren’t all taxes essentially bachelor taxes though?

That’s the underlying problem, indeed. But men with money and brains can always game a system.

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

OldBill wrote:

Her job in “social services” is nothing but government mandated busy work in which she “helps” other government subsidized worthless pieces of s~~~ like herself remain slaves in all but name. She’s s~~~ out four more future thralls from as many men and, because the government provides monetary incentives not to marry and to drive those men away, she’s “raising” the next generation of dysfunctional adults, felons, and single mothers the government will then be “forced” to both monitor and assist.

Oh! You mean like Ukraine is doing …

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[Author]

Posts