"Blows the Blackpill MGTOW Movement Out of the Water"

[GrumpyParticipant]

President Camacho wrote:

You guys have to understand, it’s the same old saw about us not being good enough for women and that’s REALLY why we’re bitter.

Shiiiiiit..
Is that all?
Hell,
even lesbians will tell you women aren’t good enough for women. Nothing is good enough for women, so thats exactly what I give them and their pussy whipped supporters.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[bladeParticipant]

So what do we type into google so i can see this

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

WOW Soylentgeneration really waxed philosophical on this one—good job! There are a lot of good posts but I think he nailed it.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

blade wrote:

So what do we type into google so i can see this

“black pill MGTOW argument the hall” and click on the first link that comes up (Philosophy of Social Science) then scroll down to the bottom of that page.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[Anonymous 5]

A false argument indeed. Mgtow is beyond people like this. Yet at the same time I find us more and more strong from this level of doubt.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Meh
To each his own.
I have met quite a few of these “superior” people in my lifetime. If they are the benchmark to attain, no wonder humanity is f~~~ed.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

blade wrote:

We all know married dudes don’t get that much sex .

No, no. Their numbers are probably correct. A quarter of married men probably are getting laid only twice a week. It’s just that their numbers are misleading.

Because they don’t mention those married chumps are paying through the nose for every f~~~. Those who don’t believe this simply don’t understand they are f~~~ing on credit. Make no mistake, eventually wifey is going to hand them the bill, and the bill is going to be huge.

What MGTOW understand, and the author of this little rag piece doesn’t (or pretends not to) is that paying for sex is no great accomplishment. To do an honest report, he really should do another survey asking single men how many of them pay for sex, and then compare that figure to the number of married men who pay for sex. Which is all of them. Sure 25% of married men are getting laid, but 100% of them are paying to get laid, whether they are getting laid or not.

So that’s half their assets or more for a 25% chance of maybe getting laid twice a week for a few years. I have no idea what hookers charge, but given what’s available for free, I’m fairly confident honest whores are a much cheaper deal, especially in the long run.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

sidecar wrote:

So that’s half their assets or more for a 25% chance of maybe getting laid twice a week for a few years. I have no idea what hookers charge, but given what’s available for free, I’m fairly confident honest whores are a much cheaper deal, especially in the long run.

No, you see, his wife is some rich doctor lady so that doesn’t apply to HIM. Right? This is the facade people like him hide behind, never mind the fact that having a rich spouse just means she’ll leave him for someone that makes even more money in the years to come.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[guiParticipant 825]

Pardon my ignorance but what is the Black Pill?

Did some research and if I understood it right it iss the name that some dudes give their ‘new and better’ version of the redpill stuff after being frustrated with dumb PUAs identifying themselves as redpillers (instead of just ignoring them). Is that all there is to it or is there any other major difference?

Pity and contempt are siblings. You only feel pity for those you consider weak.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

President Camacho wrote:

No, you see, his wife is some rich doctor lady so that doesn’t apply to HIM. Right?

Did you read what I said about f~~~ing on credit? All a rich wife means is the bill is going to be that much larger when she drops it in his lap.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

LOL you’re right, I’m just using logic he’s used in previous posts he’s made. Since his woman is rich and he’s an alpha male she’ll never leave him and take his money.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

President Camacho wrote:

Since his woman is rich and he’s an alpha male she’ll never leave him and take his money.

Isn’t he going to be surprised when wifey gets pregnant (by Chad or not – doesn’t matter to her), and quits her job to be a mommy? And then when she cries to the judge about how he made her abandon her lucrative, money making career to have his children, boo hoo. So he needs to pay even more in alimony and support to keep her in the lifestyle to which she should have become accustomed, the poor dear.

This mark is being set up hard by her, and he’s too much of a chump to know it.

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

Elric Greenstone wrote:

sidecar wrote:

I do not envy their marriages, but they envy the f~~~ out of my freedom.

Pretty much. I still have moments of white-picket-fence-building, but most of the time I’m delighted to be able to call my time my own.

Do the whole white-picket-fence thing, and then invite women over, create the illusion that you are into them for more than sex (after procuring sex that is), and then send them on their merry way. Great social experiment. They see the promised land and are then denied.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[ConstantineParticipant 4420]

Since when the hell was 25% a lot of people? Why are they stating that number like it’s a massive chunk of the population? I’ve heard more persuadable arguments from YouTube commenters.

Furthermore, I never feed into statistics anymore, because we all know that they’re bent and twisted according to communal liking. 25% of married couples may have claimed this, but for all we know, it could be 25% of married couples who both have green eyes and Italian heritage. We’ve all seen that when a certain number comes out, they don’t always reveal everything about that number.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

So now people just associate some random color to what was once the red pill? Where’s the green pill or the orange pill? How about the candy striped pill or the polka-dot pill?

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

I believe the black pill is supposed to represent “giving up” on society and going your own way. This genius thinks that if you go MGTOW you are a total failure. I actively want to hurt people like this, they’re every bit as much of a problem as feminists and tradcons.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

President Camacho wrote:

I believe the black pill is supposed to represent “giving up” on society and going your own way. This genius thinks that if you go MGTOW you are a total failure. I actively want to hurt people like this, they’re every bit as much of a problem as feminists and tradcons.

Sounds like another Johnny Come Lately looking to make a name for himself by trying to be edgy.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[narwhalParticipant]

We’ve said it well. One single statistic should not be enough evidence to support any argument. Ignoring other statistics, while never looking into the possibility that your statistic may not mean what you want it to mean…is just plain stupid.

I would not be at all surprised if this stat was based on a survey of 100 people in one city in the US, without a margin of error of around 10%. I would not be surprised if the amount of sex also varied greatly based on income, length of marriage, SMV of the wife, etc.

As pointed out, it does not consider the actual cost of the sex between a single and married man. Nor does it consider the lost opportunity to experience life and career do to the limitations married life puts on a man.

Ok. Then do it.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

JollyMisanthrope wrote:

Do the whole white-picket-fence thing, and then invite women over, create the illusion that you are into them for more than sex (after procuring sex that is),

Nah. Don’t be interested in them for anything at all. It’s easier to let them see your white picket fence while being completely disinterested in them (brain and pussy alike). They will do ANYTHING they can think of to get your attention then in the hope of getting a fat slice of your white picket pie. Of course most of them can’t think of anything beyond throwing their pussy at you, but that’s not your fault, or problem.

Of course this only works if you haven’t already f~~~ed them or otherwise given them cause to think they already have their hooks in you. If that’s the case, they’ll try to withhold sex to raise it’s price and get your s~~~ for themselves that way.

and then send them on their merry way.

Which is exactly what you do in the second case. Once they start trying to put a price on their pussy or attention or anything else they have to offer, they should be gone.

Great social experiment. They see the promised land and are then denied.

In an experiment you never know for certain what the results will be. Here we know. AWALT.

narwhal wrote:

As pointed out, it does not consider the actual cost of the sex between a single and married man. Nor does it consider the lost opportunity to experience life and career do to the limitations married life puts on a man.

It also missed the single biggest issue about married sex.

A single man who isn’t getting laid as much as he wants can do something about it.

A married man who isn’t getting laid CAN’T. At least not legally and without getting double extra raped in divorce court.

Single men are masters of their own destinies. Married men are not.

[Anonymous 9]

The bitch you’re constantly f~~~ing feels like she owns you.

That you can’t find another like her out of the millions of women roaming around.

The same way you ended up f~~~ing her is the same way you’ll end up f~~~ing whoever else wants to come along and play.

Your happiness will never come from a woman.

It comes from within, and sex is just a leisure activity. Think about how long it takes to have sex with a nagging c~~~, and think about the time it takes to remove yourself from petty arguments and fights aimed at destroying your spirit.

MGTOW is about peace at the end of the day. I’ve never been in a relationship where I didn’t end up a shell of my former self during the brief periods of partnership.

I hate those anti-MGTOW types.

They willingly spew rhetoric that will enslave any man who buys into it.

[Author]

Posts