Backpage: The police will hunt you for patronizing prostitutes in the U.S.

[HammerheadParticipant 362]

To those of you suggesting to impressionable young guys that it’s cheaper/easier to go to a prostitute than to date the modern Strong Independent Woman in the U.S., be aware that the police are always hunting for Johns seeking or patronizing prostitutes. A criminal conviction for a “sex offense” will haunt you for life. TSG picked up this story because the guy was being cheap and offered to pay for sex with a McDonald’s quarter pounder and French fries, but the cops arrest many, many guys all the time. Be careful what you choose to do, when you go your own way and it involves criminalized actions.

“Man Nabbed In Police Sting Arranged To Pay Hooker With McDonald’s Quarter Pounder And Fries

A Wyoming man who arranged to pay a prostitute with a McDonald’s Quarter Pounder and French fries was arrested when he showed up for the illicit encounter, food in hand, only to discover that he had been snared in a police sting.

As part of an undercover operation, cops in Casper placed a Backpage.com ad in the guise of a hooker trolling for clients.

Investigators charge that David Mangus, 22, answered the ad and arranged last week to meet the purported prostitute for sex. But instead of paying cash in return for oral and vaginal sex, cops say, Mangus worked out a deal to provide the hooker with food instead.

Specifically, a McDonald’s Quarter Pounder with cheese and a medium size order of French fries.

Mangus, seen above, was arrested when he arrived to meet the supposed hooker. He was carrying a bag with the McDonald’s grub when undercover officers took him into custody.

Mangus was charged with soliciting prostitution, a misdemeanor. He was booked into the Natrona County jail and later released.”

http://www.thesmokinggun.com/buster/mcdonalds/cheeseburger-hooker-wyoming-739258

[Anonymous 11]

Yes, they most definitely will. I’ve heard of some jurisdictions even seizing the john’s car.

I’m thinking that getting some pussy for a McD’s value meal should have raised a flag in his brain.

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

It really is f~~~ed up. Sex is the only service a person can’t sell !!! I can freely pay a women to clean my house, tailor a garment, cut my hair, etc., but for some reason a blow job is a criminal activity.

When is this country going to stop wasting police/court time (tax dollars) on enforcing such archaic ridiculous laws?

Don’t the police and courts have ANYTHING else to do ???

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Like Jim Jeffries pointed out, America has the largest porn industry therefore prostitution is only legal if you film it.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

FrostByte wrote:

prostitution is only legal if you film it.

prostitution is only legal if you film it, or marry it.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 42]

America has succumb to pussy crotch rot! All eyes are on the pussy like a screaming child!

Give her this

Give her that

Give her whatever she wants!

I say give her SQUAT!

Being hunted down for buying pussy isn’t my worry! I don’t even want that s~~~ for FREE!

Great job feminism has done for woman’s SMV! Like trying to sell all the contents of FUKUSHIMA UNIT III

[KeymasterKeymaster]

This is why you must make it TOTALLY KNOWN the you are not “paying her for sex”, you’re paying her to LEAVE. . You can even record it on your phone.

“Honey I would NEVER IN A MILLION YEARS pay you for sex because no woman is worth it, but let’s f~~~ and when I am done, I will pay you $X to get the f~~~ out and I never want to see you again.”.

Then you’re not paying for sex.

You’re crystal clear that you’re paying her so you don’t have to date her, call her again, talk to her, listen to her, take her out, sit across from her or tolerate her while listening to her stupid hopes and dreams. That’s perfectly legal. Just like divorce prostitution is legal: You’re paying the whore to LEAVE.

Paying for sex is never worth it — or even necessary!
But I have heard some divorced men say paying her to go away was worth every penny.

Women don’t know how to leave after a good f~~~. The whores will even come back later – 30 years later – to collect on a f~~~ they THINK should have been paid for. They think “men pay for sex”, but you don’t pay her to marry you either. You pay her to go away.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AttonParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

America has succumb to pussy crotch rot! All eyes are on the pussy like a screaming child!

Give her this

Give her that

Give her whatever she wants!

I say give her SQUAT!

Being hunted down for buying pussy isn’t my worry! I don’t even want that s~~~ for FREE!

Great job feminism has done for woman’s SMV! Like trying to sell all the contents of FUKUSHIMA UNIT III

Both will give you cancer

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[HammerheadParticipant 362]

Keymaster:

Yeah, good luck with that defense tactic in criminal court…

[OgreParticipant 5863]

I prefer when the police use my tax dollars to prevent actual crimes instead of engaging in entrapment for what should be legal. It must have been a slow day in Natrona County.

It’s prostitution if he’s seeking sex, but if she’s offering sex to get at his resources it’s all legal.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[Anonymous 25]

Fleshlight is better and it’s disease free and free from risk of any false accusations

Peace and pleasure all in one

Women made themselves obsolete with their s~~~ty attitudes

[narwhalParticipant]

The entrapment part is what really ticks me off. However, I’m a little surprised that bartering is considered payment. That’s a bit nebulous. If a burger payment constitute payment for sex, then every woman who ever put ANY condition on sex is legally a prostitute. Dinner. Chores. A favor. A ring. Anything at all. She’s legally a prostitute and he’s the John.

At the same time, it would not be too hard for a man to get a woman arrested for soliciting prostitution.

If you make that dinner I like, I’ll go down on you later.

You’re on!

He’s officially a prostitute and she’s the John. She’s arrested, you’re not.

Ok. Then do it.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

50% of Democrats vs. 34% of Republicans support legalizing prostitution.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Hammerhead wrote:

, good luck with that defense tactic in criminal court…

It’s not a tactic.
It’s a FACTic.

They have to prove you “paid for sex”, and can’t — when you can prove you didn’t.

She doesn’t get the money before sex, she gets it ONLY with the express understanding that it is NOT FOR SEX, but to F~~~ OFF AND GET LOST – or NO interaction will take place. You make the whore repeat it out loud and record her saying it. “I will f~~~ and suck you for free and I will love every second of pleasing you better than a girlfriend, and I agree you are paying me $X to never expect you call me again or pursue you for any reason — including more sex. I promise I will not slash your tires or key your car like Carrie Underwood if you don’t want to see me again.”.

Thats’ what you’re paying her for.
Not to be a violent & destructive c~~~ when the free sex is over.

That’s why prostitutes are more fun than girlfriends. Because NO MAN wants to deal with a Carrie Underwood psycho whore. who destroys personal property when you don’t call her again. That’s what “girlfriends” actually think they are justified in doing and the comment stream of “lols” proves it. If a man doesn’t want a c~~~ like that, he can get another one for sex and pay her not to be a destructive bitch. They don’t know right from wrong, so you have to pay her not to destroy your property. Get it?

You can pay a man to FIX your car,
So you pay a whore to NOT smash your car up.

Besides women are MUCH too horny to ever feel a need to “PAY one for sex”.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1093011/Women-far-promiscuous-men-says-shock-new-study.html

Show that to anyone in criminal court and let the jury wipe their own asses with it.

••••••

Now I’m not suggesting a man gives a woman his money FOR ANY reason.
Because I know women are much too horny to ever need to pay one to f~~~ or get naked.

You can even make a total hottie (who thinks she’s a feminist) pull up her top by saying
“SHOW US YOUR T~~~!! DON’T WORRY I’M GAY!!!”

She doesn’t need to know you’re not gay (does it even matter?), but that’s how cheap the whore really is.
You don’t need to pay her a goddam thing!

I’m just saying if “paying for sex” is a problem, just make sure you DON’T ever “pay a woman for sex”. Nowhere is it illegal to pay a woman to f~~~ off. It’s perfectly legal for person A to give person B money just because you like them. You can pay someone to fix your roof and you can pay someone to make your lunch.

You can pay a woman to not smash your car up too.
And you can legally pay a whore to leave. It’s called “divorce”.

And NO COURT will be able to correct you on that. Because thats’ where that kind of prostitution takes place every goddam day. Women are paid to f~~~ off and get lost every day and nobody has a problem with it. Especially the women themselves. They LOVE it.

When life gives you lemons… make lemonade.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

FrostByte wrote:

Like Jim Jeffries pointed out, America has the largest porn industry therefore prostitution is only legal if you film it.

I never understood how that is even possible.

Makes absolutely no sense at all.

Monk

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Meister wrote:

I never understood how that is even possible.
Makes absolutely no sense at all.

That’s why it’s called a “legal system” now — instead of a JUSTICE system.

It’s not about what “right”.

They think paternity fraud should be “legal” and Maury Povich made an entire career out of it. Under a “legal system” a woman attempts to get away with the worst possible non-violent thing she can possibly do to a man.. and when its revealed “YOU ARE NOT THE FATHER”, she cries like some “victim” and is permitted to walk.

That’s what happens when you let women vote on anything other than American Idol.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Anyone remember Heidi Fliess?
Half the f~~~s who made laws against prostitution were banging her girls on taxpayer money.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

Keymaster wrote:

That’s what happens when you let women vote on anything other than American Idol.

Haven’t you banned people before for suggesting that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote?

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Rockmaninoff wrote:

Haven’t you banned people before for suggesting that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote?

I don’t know what you mean. That statement doesn’t say (or suggest) women shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

It just says: “thats’ what happens when they DO…”.

In context , we’re speaking about paternity fraud which is “legal” in all 50 states and Canadian provinces and women actually will carry on – on a daily basis on TV – as if this is justifiable and their “right” to attempt to pin fatherhood on the wrong man… even when they KNOW it is wrong. Even when she knows he’s not the father, she will do it anyway and behave like she is absolutely RIGHT.

The objection is CLEARLY not about women voting. It’s about paternity fraud being held up as ONE example of something that is “legal”….. but that doesn’t make it RIGHT.

Saying “that’s what happens when you let woman vote on anything other than American Idol” is not only hilarious because it’s steeped in truth, but it points out a very serious problem. Because that IS REALLY what happens when you let women vote on anything other than American Idol.

Here is just one example….. and here is another.
ACTUALLY BEHAVING LIKE IT’S THEIR RIGHT.

Give each of them a voting ballot that asks “should paternity fraud be legal?” and both of them would vote YES.

It would like finding a half-eaten moldy sandwich and saying, “that’s what happens when you let a 4 year old make a sandwich.”. It doesn’t mean 4 year old shouldn’t make sandwiches. It means the 4 year old didn’t know any better to wrap it up and refrigerate it or throw it out.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Rockmaninoff wrote:

Haven’t you banned people before for suggesting that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote?

But women shouldn’t be allowed to vote!

[Author]

Posts