Artificially intelligent sexbot $20000

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Solid wrote:

Gargamel wrote:

Mine would cost 40 k.

Still cheaper than what a c~~~ costs in the long run. If this kind of robots do all the house work, 40k is almost “for free” !
Comparing with the costs of marriage:

– Expensive house
– Wedding party & ultra expensive ring
– Maid to clean the house because c~~~ won’t do it
– Gardener to take care of the garden because c~~~ won’t do it
– Nanny to take care of the babies because c~~~ won’t do it
– C~~~ also won’t cook, or you take her out for dinner or order some delivery food
– Ultra expensive car
– Infinite list of demands
– Wife won’t turn off/shutup
– Wife uses sex starvation as a manipulation tool
– Divorce will ruin you completely
– Alimony will suck all your money

IMHO even 100k will be an affordable price considering the long run. I love to see the progress that is going on in this field, even if it is not perfect yet, but there are several use cases for this kind of robot. What you said about a military model, soon as these robots start selling like water in the desert, for sure we will have firefighters that are robots due to the fact that they can expose themselves to higher risks, and for sure, some soldiers will be robots too, you can turn one of these into a robot for your home.

Brilliant, wish I would have posted it.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

narwhal wrote:

I simply don’t see sexbots as a game changer.

Trust me on this one–it is a game changer in the most profound way. Women have had a monopoly on male access to sex. That is the source of their power and control. Sexbots break that monopoly forever. I call that a game changer. I agree however that the artificial womb is the next logical step. Once that is developed there is no reason for real flesh and blood women to suck another breath of air. All you have to do in order to gauge the level of change this represents is take a look at the female response to it…They know they are finished if sexbots become a reality. If it were a nothing burger c~~~s would just blow it off. But they are in a panic. And with good reason.

Editing note: I meant real flesh and blood women have no desirability but their absence. The sexbot is designed to appeal to MY wants, MY likes etc. That is why she will be tailor made to my individual tastes.

[OldBillParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

All you have to do in order to gauge the level of change this represents is take a look at the female response to it.

Exactly. Blow-up dolls, pocket pussies, flesh lights, and the like have been around for several decades without a peep from the c~~~s. Then when realistic sexbots at relative cheap prices appear on the horizon and suddenly every pundit, academic, and professional whiner with a c~~~ wants to talk about “morality”, “problems”, “restrictions”, and “issues”.

Of course, the Turbo-Diesel Vagoo-Reamer 3000 they all have tucked under their futons don’t merit talking about “morality”, “problems”, “restrictions”, and “issues”.

Mark my words. There’s a huge campaign in the offering against sexbots. The screaming, shaming, attempts at prohibition, and all the rest haven’t even begun yet.

While they’re too busy hunting down sexbots, the exo-womb is going to catch them off guard. Human trials are scheduled for 2020 and there hasn’t been much push back because the technology is being spun as one that will help women. It will to do that, but it will help men more.

Once women no longer control procreation, they’re going to find themselves a glut on the market.

I hope I live long enough to see the waves of female suicides I know will be the result.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[bladeParticipant]

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[GargamelSpectator 29101]

OldBill wrote:

Once women no longer control procreation, they’re going to find themselves a glut on the market.

I hope I live long enough to see the waves of female suicides I know will be the result.

I can’t wait to see this.

We will have plenty of felines ready to comfort them during their last days.

In July of 2018, this honey pot forum was sold out to an unidentified NPC sock puppet and troll organization. Most independent thinkers and writers migrated to other MGTOW forums as a result of the never-ending infighting and deliberate trouble starting caused by members who were given "carte blanche" by the admin to do whatever they want. Before my departure, I only left a few thousand cat pics here to comfort and ridicule the feminist owners who now run this place. Their background agenda is to make MGTOW look like a club of losers the public eye. And during the course of 2019, they actually managed to destroy almost all other MGTOW venues as well. Here is the truth about "theindependentman.org" aka "TIM" which was created as an extended workbench to further divide the community. When you register, they install a spyware Zombie cookie on your browser that does all kinds of things the user does not know of: http://www.filedropper.com/essay-on-the-removal-of-malware-cookies-used-by-tim

[bstoffParticipant 4868]

It seems to me that the technology should be more advanced than it currently appears to be regarding tactile dexterity and facial movements, etc.

Maybe the tech is being held back for some reason.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

The first generation sex-bot hasn’t been released yet, and women are panicking. The issue around bans of sex-bots are DIY-sets. Create a utility-robot that has the skeleton/functionality of a human being, and program it to do domestic work. Sell it on the market cheaply.

Then in comes the modders that will mod the software, make blueprints of parts necessary to make the robot a fully functional sex-bot. The clinch is that it isn’t just a sex-bot, but a domestic robot with “upgrades”. Thus it can’t be banned.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

At 5:23, Katie Couric made me laugh with her questions. I kept saying,”NO!” out loud.

Modern women don’t understand the concept of “quid pro quo.” A long time ago, women knew they had to GIVE something to the man who provided them with a home, spending money, and protection. And it is very, very easy for a woman to please a man with a charming personality, cooking, cleaning, and sex. A lot of men don’t really require more than that.

But these 21st century bitches have all sorts of demands for their husbands, and don’t want to give anything to them! They want to watch TV, and shop at the mall at your expense. They watch reality TV “housewives” and desire to emulate their inane lifestyles. You get nothing from them. And since they offer nothing, it makes sense for these guys to buy a love doll. These sex robots may be lifeless, but at least they DO SOMETHING! And, over a period of time, they cost less than the upkeep of a real woman who DOES NOTHING.

I think a $20,000 sex robot is about the same amount of money a guy would spend on a live-in girlfriend or a wife over a period of 5 years.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Author]

Posts