Another Welfare Bitch Found

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

So I passed by this woman with four children trying to feed her kids. Typical welfare bitch.

What makes me widen my eyes is that this video was made and posted in mid-2015, the women became unemployed in 2013, and has an eight-month-old child. This means that she got knocked up even after losing her job.

It just sucks that I still remind myself of the people who rip money off of hard workers.

[RoyDalParticipant]

The more kids she begets, the bigger her monthly checks.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[BeerParticipant 11832]

RoyDal wrote:

The more kids she begets, the bigger her monthly checks.

Welcome to the decay of American society. Single mommy popping out kids when she already has more than she can afford crying her handouts aren’t enough because she isn’t banking enough to save for retirement? F~~~ you c~~~! I’m sure she’s getting child support as well…if not, its not my problem she reproduced with losers.

Meanwhile your average traditional family not on welfare is only having 1-2 kids because its all they can afford. Its going to be interesting to see what happens down the road when the number of kids who grow up emulating their welfare mommies outnumber those who try to do things the responsible way. Its also a large part of my motivation to be a minimalist and retire early…the less I have to support this f~~~ed up system the better.

[Anonymous 42]

Bridgeport, Connecticut’s Detroit!
I purchased a 110 amp industrial tig welder there, a surplus from the industrial manufacturing collapse!

Move to America, lots of iron in the diet! Not much else, but tons of iron!

[XSDBSParticipant 3604]

Beer wrote:

Its going to be interesting to see what happens down the road when the number of kids who grow up emulating their welfare mommies outnumber those who try to do things the responsible way.

Down the road?
I dealt with “welfare mommies” 25 years ago, working as a grocery checkout clerk.
All of them buying cigarettes/booze with change from paper food stamps….
I’m sure there are 3rd and 4th generations of them by now…

[BeerParticipant 11832]

XSDBS wrote:

Down the road?
I dealt with “welfare mommies” 25 years ago, working as a grocery checkout clerk.
All of them buying cigarettes/booze with change from paper food stamps….
I’m sure there are 3rd and 4th generations of them by now…

Yup…but they didn’t make up a majority back then. I found some government statistics from 2011 that claimed 38% of kids were on welfare, and 2012 data claimed 40% of moms w/minors are single moms…not sure if there are any newer numbers out there but one more generation of kids growing up under these conditions, reproducing faster than people who only have what they can afford, and copying mommy and daddy when they get older as far as their lifestyle choices, and broken families with kids on welfare will be the majority compared to traditional married families that feed what they breed.

If you think it was bad 25 years ago its going to be 10x worse in another 25.

[BigDParticipant 3024]

We all make life decisions. Sometimes everyday, and sometimes once in awhile. If your life sucks and you make other peoples’ lives suck, then you have made poor life decisions. Why should I feel sorry for someone else because of their decisions? I say let her rot. She could use to lose a few pounds.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[HitmanParticipant]

O.K. she’s FAT .
only in America do you find the “poor ” to be FAT .
she’s literally eating our money and getting FAT .
how much f~~~ing food does it take to get so FAT ????
what about a diet ? exercise ? nooooo,( i mean MOOOO!!!).
FAT people should be rich, or they shouldn’t be given so much food !
why does she have to be so FAT ?
AAAHHHHRRRRRGGGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!

[AvidAvariceParticipant 223]

– “Until she can sustain herself” she says.
– She was a teacher’s assistant before she lost her job.
– The median income for teacher’s assistants is 24K.

How does one “sustain” herself and 4 kids on 24K a year? Obvious bulls~~~. Not to mention she spread her legs and had 4th kid after she’d been unemployed for a while. That gives you an idea of how the other three came to be.

[sidecarParticipant 35864]

Beer wrote:

f you think it was bad 25 years ago its going to be 10x worse in another 25.

You really think it’s going to last another 25 years?

Twenty trillion in debt and counting…

[BeerParticipant 11832]

sidecar wrote:

You really think it’s going to last another 25 years?

Twenty trillion in debt and counting…

I’m on the fence right now. Debt as a % of GDP was higher during the WWII era than it is today and we managed to pay it down from that point. I just think we’re f~~~ed as a nation simply because financially we are still moving in the wrong direction, we have no credible plan to start moving in the right direction, we simply have too many people who vote for “free” s~~~, too many young idiots who think socialism is good, and when you couple all that with globalization we have a pretty bleak looking scenario for our future.

I’m fairly certain I’ll see America melt down in my lifetime, I just don’t know if its going to be in 10 years or 40 years. Honestly all I’m concerned about is that I have enough money spread out in companies that do business around the globe so when we do have a meltdown I won’t care because I’ll be on a foreign beach still collecting dividends. When we finally have our major economic meltdown it just means other countries will be stepping up to fill the void, its not like the world is going to end, and as far as global corporations go it really doesn’t matter if they do 100b a year in business with us, Europe, China, or Russia…they’ll still make the same profits and pay the same dividends.

Ideally Trump will get into office and be a badass and get us headed in the right direction and it will take a couple of sucky presidents after him to get us back to where we are now…but that is a complete best case scenario and honestly will only stall the unavoidable meltdown because feminism and broken families are butt f~~~ing this country and won’t be going away anytime soon. We’ll probably just end up with a democrat for the next president(or even if Trump wins he’d probably end up being useless anyhow), and another 4 years that’s been just like the last few presidents…a slow steady spiral to the bottom of the bowl.

[sidecarParticipant 35864]

Beer wrote:

I’m on the fence right now. Debt as a % of GDP was higher during the WWII era than it is today and we managed to pay it down from that point.

The thing about the war debt is it was spent on building up an industrial powerhouse that, while originally tooled up to make weapons, was immediately ready to switch over to producing consumer goods for returning soldiers wanting to get on with their lives and bringing back the productivity to do it with them. It was money borrowed to invest in infrastructure.

Our current debt was not incurred to increase productivity. It was borrowed to breed up generations of unproductive consumers as captive voters for the welfare state.

So the war debt increased production, while the current debt increased consumption. The two are not comparable. One is easily recovered from. The other is not, if at all.

There’s a very good chance we won’t last another decade.

[FearlessMGHOWParticipant 1928]

Hitman wrote:

O.K. she’s FAT .
only in America do you find the “poor ” to be FAT .

That was my observation as well. You only find “poor” fat people in western countries.

Anyone who’s truly “poor” isn’t fat. Or at the very least, they’re not obese like she is.

Men age like fine wine. Women age like milk. "One hundred women are not worth a single testicle." -Confucius

[Anonymous 42]

Beer wrote:

I’m fairly certain I’ll see America melt down in my lifetime, I just don’t know if its going to be in 10 years or 40 years.

Wake up sunshine, we’ve been melting away for the past 50 years! More is lost than we’ve gained for 100 years. They’re not politicians, they’re drovers of debt slaves, and the people are human droves being driven to the slaughterhouse! The dollar is being driven to extinction. When it finally collapses, down comes baby, cradle and all. The filthy rich will become the filthy poor and the filthy poor will become the filthy dead…

It’s good to have a year supply of imperishable foods just to survive the transition of every-man-for-himself…

[BeerParticipant 11832]

sidecar wrote:

Our current debt was not incurred to increase productivity. It was borrowed to breed up generations of unproductive consumers as captive voters for the welfare state.

2016

1970

1944

Social Security as a % of GDP over time

On a federal level its been pensions and healthcare that have been growing the budget more than anything…granted a lot of healthcare spending should be under the welfare category as a lot of it is medicaid. But regardless all it would take is some meaningful healthcare reform and pension reform.

Healthcare reform we simply need some reform that actually goes after the true problem…why the f~~~ do we pay so much more than other countries? Obamacare was a massive failure from the start in my eyes simply because it didn’t make any real effort to lower the cost of care itself…it just made a bogey man out of the insurance companies while forcing us all to do business with them. In the end rates are going to remain obscene because the cost of care is obscene. In the end we could probably shave 10% off our federal budget easy if we just had some meaningful healthcare reform that bought our costs more in line with what other countries pay.

Pension reform has been slowly happening over the last few years but its the 20 and out with a COLA increase every year people that are crushing the pension system. I don’t have a problem with pensions as long as they are funded by the people who will be drawing from them while those people are working, but its bulls~~~ we pretty much had 2 generations of government workers that promised themselves fat pensions but didn’t actually fund said pension fund while they were working and now expect the next generation to pony up. Pensions wouldn’t be more than a few % of the budget if the government version of pension didn’t amount to generational theft. The same thing is happening on a state level in a lot of states as well.

The wildcard is social security which was as poorly managed by past generations as they managed their pension system. If we just leave it as is and when the day comes its out of money we just simply pay out 70% or whatever is sustainable with the current tax levels it won’t be much of a factor, but something tells me current retirees are going to demand full benefits while pushing the cost on to future generations either with more taxes or more debt…which much like the current pension scheme will just amount to more generational theft.

I’d like to blame it all on the welfare folks, and they definitely don’t help much and will be becoming a bigger problem as they reproduce faster than the responsible folks, and its definitely stupid subsidizing that behavior…but at the end of the day fixing the system amounts to more than a little welfare reform, and all the welfare reform in the world isn’t going to fix the system on its own.

Just another example of generational theft while I’m on a rant about how f~~~ed up this country is and how much Americans for the last 50 years have loved to kick the can down the road and f~~~ the next guy…I have quite a bit of time in with the Teamsters so I’ve been following the drama going on with the central states fund. Its massively underfunded right now and the union is trying to cut payouts so the fund doesn’t run dry. The idea being is they can sustain maybe 50% payouts to their members, or they can run the fund dry and there is a government pension insurance fund that will cover 17% of their promised payouts if their fund goes belly up. The ruling came down recently that they couldn’t cut payouts…they have to keep paying out 100% until the fund is bankrupt…at which point, they’ll get 17%. All the retired guys thought it was a huge victory. They get to collect the full amount for a few more years at which point the funds runs dry…yet all the current workers are left paying into a pension fund that is literally bleeding off money. For these guys its the equivalent of being able to look into the future and deciding to buy a bunch of stocks that are going to go to 0. Every single Teamster employee should vote the union out when they are up for a new contract…why the f~~~ do you want to pay into a pension fund that is on life support with a terminal illness? Best move of my life was getting out of the Teamsters as the fund I’m vested in is currently 40% funded and dropping a little each year. I have my fingers crossed after the central states fund goes bankrupt some of the other funds start to offer buyouts to guys like me who are vested, no longer in the union, and have a ways to go to retire. The older guys don’t give a rats ass, they just want the most they can get for them self and f~~~ the next guy in line…so it just kinda cracks me up when I hear people bitch about the decline of unions and pensions being a middle class problem when in my experience they amount to one more way previous generations decided to f~~~ millennials over. I’m so happy at my new employer the money they put towards my retirement is going into a 401k and an annuity account in my name rather than into a ponzi scheme that lets me work to support someone other guys retirement and is almost guaranteed to implode long before I ever get the same deal that guy got.

[sidecarParticipant 35864]

Beer wrote:

On a federal level its been pensions and healthcare that have been growing the budget more than anything…granted a lot of healthcare spending should be under the welfare category as a lot of it is medicaid.

The government pensions also qualify as a form of welfare, at least as far as the economy is concerned, since government jobs are at best wealth facilitating. Most are simply wealth consuming and not wealth producing. All the wealth that funds those government jobs was produced by someone else, but then instead of being used by the producer for investment or economic growth, was extracted from the producer via taxation.

So they represent debt for the increase of consumption, not production as surely as every monthly check to every baby factory welfare queen.

But regardless all it would take is some meaningful healthcare reform and pension reform.

Too little. Too late. The money has already been borrowed and spent and on things that only make it more difficult to pay back, not less. At best healthcare reform (which is all about insurance etc. and almost nothing to do with care itself) and pension reform will slow the debt increase, but cannot do anything to actually pay it off.

So again, you can’t make a dollar to dollar comparison between the WW2 debt and our current debt because the war debt was spent on things that made it easier to repay while our current debt was spent on things that make it all but politically impossible to fix.

[Anonymous 11]

We slowly reduced our WWII debts via “financial repression” which they are imposing again on us today. Getting 0.5% APR on a savings account is a manifestation of financial repression. The critical difference from then is that we had manufacturing capability as Sidecar noted, and the people as a whole were more virtuous.

Our country is financially like a crackhead. Are we going to have 40 trillion in debt in 8 years? This whole thing is going to come down hard.

America, the country where the poor are f~~~ing obese and the wealthy are generally more trim.

[RhettParticipant 637]

Did anyone notice the kids all look different? Not one fcuking mention of the fathers of those children? At least she admitted it’s ALL her fault! America is decaying from the inside out.

Single guys come home, look at what’s in the fridge, and go to bed. Married guys come home, look at what’s in bed, and go to the fridge.......But the best representative of MGTOW is…………… an empty chair,.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10966]

Hitman wrote:

O.K. she’s FAT .
only in America do you find the “poor ” to be FAT .
she’s literally eating our money and getting FAT .
how much f~~~ing food does it take to get so FAT ????
what about a diet ? exercise ? nooooo,( i mean MOOOO!!!).
FAT people should be rich, or they shouldn’t be given so much food !
why does she have to be so FAT ?
AAAHHHHRRRRRGGGGGHHH!!!!!!!!!!

I hear you Hitman. Historically, obesity was associated with the rich, wealthy and powerful. Not so now. We have the fattest “poor” people in the recorded history of civilization.
I think once you get benefits, you have to make due with what you have. In other words, if you pop out more kids, you don’t get more benefits. How many working parents do you know that can go to their employer and get a raise because their wife got knocked up and had another child?
The system needs revamped.

She's not looking for love. She's looking for someone to finance the lifestyle that SHE thinks SHE deserves.

[sidecarParticipant 35864]

Mr. Spock wrote:

I think once you get benefits, you have to make due with what you have. In other words, if you pop out more kids, you don’t get more benefits.

A $340 voucher for an abortion is the only benefit they should ever get. It’s the only way to prevent the unsustainable expansion of dependence. We should also eliminate child tax credits while we’re at it. Hold the pro-choicers to the full implications of thier position: having a child is a choice for women.

And people who choose to have a child should pay the full cost of that choice. Why should the taxpayer subsidize the lifestyle choices of others? They aren’t paying me for my choices in cars or bikes, which cost far less than any child over 18 years. And the taxpayer already can’t afford their children anyways, as our crippling national debt clearly shows.

[Author]

Posts