Anarchism Is For Boys | Capitalism Is For Men

[Anonymous 7]

That beginning picture is pretty dumb. First of all it used the word “swag”. Secondly dress how ever the f~~~ you want to dress. This is another example of how society thinks a real man should act

[Anonymous 0]

AnthonyN wrote:

First off, capitalism can survive without anarchy. Saying it can’t is just a logical fallacy. Government =/= capitilism. Second, I’m an anarchist. Not because I want to be, but because it’s the only sane option for me at least because I reject the gynocentric bulls~~~ currently plaguing our society. If we were let’s say, in ancient Greece, I’d feel differently about government.

That being said, anarchy is about the complete “lack” of government. With our current gynocentric leaders, they’re enforcing gynocentric bulls~~~ down our throats WITH government power.

Also, why the f~~~ is this even in the MGTOW central forum? Shouldn’t it be in the political section?

You may want to learn how to spell capitalism before spelling it as “capitilism” and secondly a government is not a capitalist system. A government imposes taxes on people and enforces the law. Capitalism is a economic system that uses capital and provides goods and services.

If a government needs money they simply raise taxes and enforce more laws if a company needs money they simply work harder.

You wouldn’t know the difference seeing as how you didn’t even bother to any research at all.

Welcome to the idiocracy…

[Anonymous 0]

Anonymous wrote:

That beginning picture is pretty dumb. First of all it used the word “swag”. Secondly dress how ever the f~~~ you want to dress. This is another example of how society thinks a real man should act

Lets see if any businessmen would take you seriously if you dress up as a clown. A poor person dressing up as an idiot is called a crazy person. A rich person dressing up like an idiot is called an “eccentric”.

Know the difference.

[Anonymous 0]

Big Boss wrote:

I see…. yes… and the earth is flat. Ok… *walks away from thread*

Bye, hypocritical libertarian f~~~stick. Honest people say “that’s wrong too”. Libertarians cannot. They try to act like they won something by pussing out.

If you argue with an idiot you only stoop to their level. I think that’s exactly what Big Boss is trying to imply and it is usually true. You cannot argue with a child much less argue with an idiot.

If that offends you than you really must be an idiot just like fat-shaming I guess there is idiot-shaming too.

[Anonymous 0]

Big Boss wrote:

He has no common sense and his supporters just want free stuff without realizing people don’t do s~~~ for free.

You mean like mandatory unpaid overtime?

There is no such thing as mandatory unpaid overtime. You work there because you choose to work there. Only stupid people get taken advantage of because they either are too afraid to work for themselves or they lack the sufficient skills to actually be productive.

If you think your job can be easily replaced then it is most likely true and you probably will be. I suggest you start learning how to actually work.

[Anonymous 0]

If you don’t want to be a cheap supplier of resources and labor for an international corporation, don’t allow them to take over your country.

Let me know when you become the leader of a country and successfully run it until then you are full of s~~~ like everyone else.

The only way to stop a corporation from generating profits is to stop buying their products. I see a lot of McDonalds restaurants all over the world and a lot of hungry,lazy people willing to pay others to cook meals for them.

You can’t sell if there is nobody to buy. That’s not how it works in a consumerist society.

[Anonymous 0]

Yeah I’m a feminist. You’re really grasping at straws now, The Underwear Network.

You sure seem to be spending a lot of time here on the forums. I guess arguing with people on the internet may as well be your job but seeing as how you racked up a lot of RATE points I guess that’s the only way for you to get paid.

If you are good at what you do don’t do it for free. If you rob a bank you are a typical criminal. If you rob a nation you are a genius and other people will hire you to pull it off again.

[Anonymous 0]

I see that a lot of self-proclaimed MGTOW that don’t exactly support capitalism seeing as how they don’t have absolutely any. Because those that say money isn’t everything are for those that have none.

I am beginning to question the MGTOW community in general. I guess the only successful MGTOW are the ones too busy making a life for themselves instead of arguing with idiots on the internet.

Sharing philosophical advice was a mistake here seeing as how nobody here has any real desire want any and I am not being sarcastic here either. Welp, I am done here, later gentlemen.

[Sovereign SoulParticipant 47]

Everyone besides me posting here pretty much sounds like a f~~~ing chucklehead; ESPECIALLY the originator of this thread. “Actually, I’m more of a minarchist than an anarchist.” “You don’t even know the difference between Socialism & Communism!”

What is that they say about wrestling pigs?

[MichaelSpectator 544]

Libertarianism, Capitalism, and following the Constitution are what made America the greatest nation in the world before it’s decline. This is an established fact.

Anarchism is a complete absence of government + chaos. It’s not even close to the same as Libertarianism which advocates a small limited government.

[Anonymous 7]

Anonymous wrote:

Lets see if any businessmen would take you seriously if you dress up as a clown. A poor person dressing up as an idiot is called a crazy person. A rich person dressing up like an idiot is called an “eccentric”.

Know the difference.

I wasn’t talking about a business man, I was talking about men in general.

Know the difference.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Anonymous wrote:

I am beginning to question the MGTOW community in general. I guess the only successful MGTOW are the ones too busy making a life for themselves instead of arguing with idiots on the internet.

Sharing philosophical advice was a mistake here seeing as how nobody here has any real desire want any and I am not being sarcastic here either. Welp, I am done here, later gentlemen.

There is no need. This dude is just among a few. Just like in the real world there are a few of them as well, but they shill the loudest and hardest.

Your views are appreciated here. I’m pretty impressed how well you are nailing down arguments. It was as you say why I am avoiding posting in response to him, clearly like most socialist/communist/leftist/etc he can’t understand the difference between bad monetary policy, capitalism, corporatism (which is an attempt at socializing economics and state), interventionism, and fascism which is essentially what he is arguing for and against.

He like most Americans doesn’t understand the sources of the problem stem from and think people are puppets to business.

It is hilarious. Just ignore him. Keep being awesome Under Network!

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Oh and for those who are clueless whom I won’t name. Just a small hint in the right direction. Sometimes to figure out the big things, you have to start at the elementary level.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Ooo all wild west!
Ok quick question, what is the function of local banks in a business cycle?

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Well since you don’t know, and we need to find out WHY we even need banks instead of everyone just having safes…

Banks serve a purpose in the local economies by facilitating two types of people. Savers, and spenders. If all people are constantly being consumers, as they are now, and few are saving, then a bubble of sorts is created from the lack of balance in saving and spending.

A bubble that if a change in the economy transpires is pricked brings down most of the economy in that local area.

Another question since you know we at least need to fix money and MOST libertarians agree.

What is the problem with fractional reserve banking?

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Is consuming a legitimate comparative advantage, in your view? This requires personal judgement.

Consuming is fine. But there needs to be savings/production balance. Remember it is trade, not a race of consuming like a pie eating contest. I can spend better than anyone if such was the case.

Are you ready to nationAlize the Fed, cancel the shares and put it back in its constitutionally rightful place under the purview of the treasury?

My view, we can nationalize if we go pure hard/sound money. Nationalizing isn’t really a fix alone though I do agree with you. But nationalizing without repairing our monetary policy in tender is not a real change or fix.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

N~~~~ where’s my “The good the bad and the ugly” music?

….aww… yiss.. better. Better.

[AnthonyNParticipant 112]

Anonymous wrote:

AnthonyN wrote:

First off, capitalism can survive without anarchy. Saying it can’t is just a logical fallacy. Government =/= capitilism. Second, I’m an anarchist. Not because I want to be, but because it’s the only sane option for me at least because I reject the gynocentric bulls~~~ currently plaguing our society. If we were let’s say, in ancient Greece, I’d feel differently about government.

That being said, anarchy is about the complete “lack” of government. With our current gynocentric leaders, they’re enforcing gynocentric bulls~~~ down our throats WITH government power.

Also, why the f~~~ is this even in the MGTOW central forum? Shouldn’t it be in the political section?

You may want to learn how to spell capitalism before spelling it as “capitilism” and secondly a government is not a capitalist system. A government imposes taxes on people and enforces the law. Capitalism is a economic system that uses capital and provides goods and services.

If a government needs money they simply raise taxes and enforce more laws if a company needs money they simply work harder.

You wouldn’t know the difference seeing as how you didn’t even bother to any research at all.

Welcome to the idiocracy…

I didn’t know that this was English class. Thanks for correcting my spelling, oh holy grammar Nazi. I also know the difference between an economic system and a government system. What part of “government =/= capitalism didn’t you understand? It’s like you started this thread just to start s~~~.

Well, I’m definitely done with this thread.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

So we agree, man. You, like most libertarians, just like to pretend that business is still on the up an up despite the horrific totalitarian power imbalance of fiat currency and fractional reserve banking.

That doesn’t define libertarianism. In fact, let me help you DEFINE the views. (Though full disclosure this is off the top of my head)

Libertarianism is similar in view of paleo-conservativism or classical liberalism. Natural rights, self governance, representative republicanism. It is a philosophical view of government and the governed.

Capitalism is the mix of private property and savings. It can take various forms such as.

Crony captialism – Capitalism in which preference is given to specific businesses or industries through government or other business partnerships. Also at one time was considered mercantilism though that term is no longer in use. Probably because it was used by a monarchy and well connected businesses. There are probably nuanced differences. But basically England and East India Trading Co.

Free market/laissez faire capitalism – An economic market in which there is no government interference.

Corporate capitalism – An economy run by corporations and government partnerships.

Monetary policy – Decisions and policies agreed upon based on money, currency, legal tender.

Fascism – An economy run and directed by the state for the health of the state. A rejection of laissez faire styled capitalism.

Socialism – US as it is now. A mix of government intervention in market economies, and providing for welfare. Can have either or fascist, capitalist, corporatist economies.

Communism – The loss of private property, yet maintains a central banking authority. Workers are theoretically all equal, but are usually f~~~ed by those more equal than others. There is absolutely no capitalism since capital of any kind is forbidden.

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

It’s really all crony capitalism though, isn’t it?

Despite your theoretical understanding of libertarians, most have fallen for this crony capitalist system.

What about when the governmet and corporations collude to the detriment of the citizenry? What neat little box does that go in?

wew lad. Just one quote please. I know I’m awesome, but I don’t need to be quoted twice.

I personally fall under wanting a free trade mix with sound money to be used to regulate bubbles and bad business decisions. I reject government interference in the market as the market has very nuanced dynamics not understood by elected officials.

To answer your question, it is corporatism. Why that? Because corporations buy favor through lobbyist, which pay off representative staffers (who are unelected) and create the bills and other legislation through lobby organizations. Usually these bills are designed to stop new competitive businesses. Like taxi companies vs uber drivers.

That has nothing to do with libertarianism though. Corporatism mixed with socialist market intervention have nothing to do with natural rights, representative republicanism.

[Author]

Posts