Home › Forums › The Litter Box › A Woman You Deeply Respect
This topic contains 100 replies, has 36 voices, and was last updated by IRuleMe 2 years, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
So now you decide what we all agree?
Oh girl, your funny!
I know you’d like to have some more fun, “girl”, but I’m being flamed here, and I don’t appreciate that. Anyway, if you are that sure I’m a girl, please convince the master and he’ll be happy to kick my ass out of here, I’m sure. Leave me alone.
Anonymous54Hers a guy I admire and respect.
The Chilean Mine accedent.The guy who went down in the little capsule they made.
When all the Miners where back up,
Hes the last one down there.Alone.
Dude calmy takes a bow, hops in the capsule, and up he goes.
Anonymous54So now you decide what we all agree?
Oh girl, your funny!
I know you’d like to have some more fun, “girl”, but I’m being flamed here, and I don’t appreciate that. Anyway, if you are that sure I’m a girl, please convince the master and he’ll be happy to kick my ass out of here, I’m sure. Leave me alone.
Go sober up weirdo
.
Or you’re renitent to the idea that there are women, who may even deserve the respect of the great Keymaster? But let’s end that now. I’m tired of it.And she admits it.
And she admits it.
He may have a mom who deserves that respect, may he not? It’s usually moms, but who am I to know. And again, all my history suggests otherwise, but again, go ahead an convince him that I was a girl. I do not care anymore. I was a great fan of this forum and came back now after a long time of absence. Opened a controversial thread and now I get flamed. I’ve had it. Good night.
Anonymous54Goodnight.
I was a great fan of this forum and came back now after a long time of absence
Lie.
if you are that sure I’m a girl,
Now that your idiocy has been quarantined in the Litter Box where it belongs, I’ll give you some explanation before you’re kicked out entirely. Whether you’re able to understand this or not is entirely up to you.
The pejorative “tuna” doesn’t refer solely to women. It is also used to designate white knights and manginas.
Whether you’re female or not is of no consequence. The only thing that matters, the only thing which most of us called you out for, is the undeniable fact that you are an apologist for women and their behavior.
When you make blanket excuses for women and their behavior, you no longer belong here.
Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.
period
so when women of any part of the world manage to get the title of “saint” then we’ll consider the word “respect” but until then those land whales can suck on something that hits them deep and it’s “the truth” and the truth is that they can’t accomplish s~~~ the only thing that their good at accomplishing is ruining good men, and turning their gender into a bunch of selfish sloares who do the same thing.Christina Hoff Sommers
She red pilled the s~~~ out of a lot of us and has been vilified by the feminist movement. Can’t even speak on men’s issues without feminists trying to shut her speaking engagements down.
Whether you’re female or not is of no consequence. The only thing that matters, the only thing which most of us called you out for, is the undeniable fact that you are an apologist for women and their behavior.
I couldn’t find any passage written be my in that thread that would apologize women’s behaviour. You maybe find the time to quote me where exactly I was an apologist? As far as I’m concerned, that topic hasn’t even come up until now. Also, you all are invited to read my other distributions to the forums. It should very soon become clear then that you are in fact wrong about the picture you’ve build yourself up about my or more precicely, against me.
Anyway, I have requested to get my account and anything I’ve posted on here deleted as it’s turned out there is no point in remaining a memeber of this site. I came here to find my way as a man who wasn’t even sure until recently that he was a man, really. There’s been a process of becoming aware of the traits that make me great as a guy as well as the crazy feminist, gynocentric society that wants to suck us dry and then throw away. I had to realise these things and registered here in one of my sleepless nights in the hope of finding companions who feel the same unease about what’s going on and the same insecurity that arises every now and then. And indeed, this place seemed to be uncensored and free in comparison to anywhere else on the internet or in RL. Until now. A simple thing such as asking men about their experience with women they actually respect, explaining their reasons – not possible on here and I don’t see why that would be something to abolish. You abolished it and chose to flame and ridicule me over nothing while disregarding all my distributions to the forums so far, which have always been quite sensible, down-to-earth and very non-tuna. But that wasn’t enough, apparently, as you even questioned me being a man – and that sucks ’cause that throws me back to that point of shere insecurity which to eradicate I came here and many of you wanted to help me to get rid of. You’re doing the very opposite now by deliberatly misinterpreting, even though I came here to flee a society which loves doing just that. You know, they take a word, distort meaning and then you’re racist, misogynist or in my case, a tuna, a girl and blablabla. I don’t need it.
A simple thing such as asking men about their experience with women they actually respect, explaining their reasons – not possible on here and I don’t see why that would be something to abolish.
That’s disingenuous. Look back through the thread and you’ll see many honest (and a few sarcastic, albeit funny) responses to your original question.
Then you got a number of men asking why you were interested in this topic since part of the bedrock of MGTOW is recognizing that the respect women expect/demand today is largely unwarranted. I have doubts that you were entirely unaware that your question could result in suspicion (you even admitted it). Are you aware that many men here have histories that involve women they deeply respected, who later turned out to be truly evil persons? (myself included) It is world-shattering. If you want to hear stories about people worth respecting, browse through some of the life stories of other members here who have picked themselves up out of the ruins and continued living their lives, free and unburdened.
You abolished it and chose to flame and ridicule me over nothing while disregarding all my distributions to the forums so far,
I don’t think they’re ridiculing your original question. They’re attacking how you chose to interact with those who replied. You came across as dismissive, superior, and obliquely insulting in a few of your posts, and that kind of behavior made some men suspect you were tuna… because that is typical tuna behavior. And now, you’re turning it around on them and pleading innocence in the whole thing, and that people were just attacking you for no reason. That’s not quite what happened.
"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul
That’s disingenuous. Look back through the thread and you’ll see many honest (and a few sarcastic, albeit funny) responses to your original question.
Then you got a number of men asking why you were interested in this topic since part of the bedrock of MGTOW is recognizing that the respect women expect/demand today is largely unwarranted. I have doubts that you were entirely unaware that your question could result in suspicion (you even admitted it). Are you aware that many men here have histories that involve women they deeply respected, who later turned out to be truly evil persons? (myself included) It is world-shattering. If you want to hear stories about people worth respecting, browse through some of the life stories of other members here who have picked themselves up out of the ruins and continued living their lives, free and unburdened.
I understand, and yes, I feared there would be discussion and suspicion. And because many have accused me for wanting to give women an actual voice on here, let me explain my true intentions: On MGTOW.com, men are talking about women all the time. The intention of my topic was to GIVE MEN A VOICE to talk about women they may actually have some or even deep respect for. It was not intended to be about the women themselves – never. It was about men talking about these women (and they talk about all kinds of women all the time on MGTOW.com), so why not talk about that kind of women who men may have respect for? Wouldn’t that be interesting to hear their reasons? (The MEN’S reasons).
Be it just a porn star who a guy respects for giving good BJs or Mother Teresa who dedicated her life for people’s good. Or some other woman who says F~~~ you to feminism. These women DON’T HAVE A VOICE, but they ARE TALKED ABOUT AND JUDGED by men. And I was hoping that in the end, there was a collection of personas (who happen to be women) with whose views and actions we, the men, may agree. Again, it was never supposed the be “a women’s issues topic”, but men talking about a kind of woman (and we talk about women all the time there), that may deserve their (the men’s) respect, for his very own reasons. And that again fits very well with the very intentions of this forum: Men going their own way, judging and reflecting upon their own way, judging, rejecting or accepting women their own way, and so on.
[These paragraphs have been taken from a message from me to MGTOW.com.]
And lastly, it was pointed out that my intent of “having something positive” for a change on here was inappropriate and unmasking my “need for getting my ego stroked”. Admittedly, I am currently finding myself in a difficult situation. But is it really that bad if I wanted to brighten things up a bit by giving men the possibility to talk, judge and reflect upon people, who happen to be women, that may deserve their respect (and didn’t ruin them later in time)? It was the hope of having a collection of actually good and intersting experiences.
In any case, thanks to those who posted honest responses.
Not possible?
Keymaster wrote:
It wasn’t sarcasm, I REALLY want to hear about a man you deeply respect.
Ready?
Go.
My father, my brothers and I quite like French author Michel Houellebecq.
I don’t think you respect your father. I don’t think you’re a girl either. You’re gay. You all talk the same exact way. If there’s one thing I have learn about gays, they have horrible relationships with their fathers, but they all say their relationships are great. It like how everyone says they win when they go to Vegas, which really means… they lost money – lot’s of it. It’s called DELUSION.
Be it just a porn star who a guy respects for giving good BJs or Mother Teresa who dedicated her life for people’s good. Or some other woman who says F~~~ you to feminism. These women DON’T HAVE A VOICE, but they ARE TALKED ABOUT AND JUDGED by men.
Oh f~~~ off with that s~~~, you t~~~.
Please Keymaster, heed this SJW c~~~s request and delete their account.
Be it just a porn star who a guy respects for giving good BJs or Mother Teresa who dedicated her life for people’s good. Or some other woman who says F~~~ you to feminism. These women DON’T HAVE A VOICE, but they ARE TALKED ABOUT AND JUDGED by men.
Oh f~~~ off with that s~~~, you t~~~.
For your better unterstanding. This was my answer to “You wanna give women a voice here”, which I don’t want to. I want, on here, men to judge them and talk about them from their (men’s) perspective without any women shouting. That should be the meaning of the things you’ve quoted.
I’m aware that that extract could be misread as “Woman don’t have a voice, they should be heard!” blabla. But I hope I could clarify now and I hope that the rest of the response you took the quote from makes it clear that it’s about men, not women. I see I should have worded it differently, hence as follows: “I don’t want to give women a voice on here, as accused by you, but men who should be given te opportunity in this topic to judge and reflect upon women who, for their (the men’s) reasons, may deserve respect.” I’ve been explaining that continuously now.
On topic: I can think about a couple of women I respect, but can’t think of any that I would deeply respect.
-----------
Ayn Rand.
From her Donahue interview:
A woman must not be president.
Why not?
Imagine going out to your people and saying, there is not one man among your soldiers who is qualified to lead.
Ayn Rand.
Literally none.
are you a chia pet in man drag What is your guys’ opinion on Karen Straughan?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678