007

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 23183]

bstoff wrote:

They want to cause a violent rebellion, but they want their enemies to go off the deep end first, to justify whatever they want to roll out next.

The poetic justice is that by the SJWs constantly doubling down on their bigotry, the SJWs are going off the deep end first.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

won’t be watching it. will encourage others not to watch it too.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[HermitParticipant]

uchibenkei wrote:

won’t be watching it. will encourage others not to watch it too.

I have no intention of even watching a trailer for it.

I’m so sick of this man hating schit. I wish all men could just move to another planet and let the idiotic females have this one. It’d be interesting to see how long they’d last. I’d give them less than a day.

The evil in women’s hearts leaves them no moral bounds as to inhibit them from descending to the lowest levels of darkness to acquire their self entitled desires.

[sidecarParticipant 35874]

Handsome Vic wrote:

I don’t think there’s a big anti-West, anti-male conspiracy behind this movie remake.

Then why are they casting one of Brie Larson’s anti-male, anti-West feminist bitch friends?

Wait until the marketing for it gets rolling. You’ll see.

Hermit wrote:

There’s just nothing good out there anymore.

On the contrary, there’s a hell of a lot of really good stuff coming out of Asia lately.

It’s not the whole movie industry that has the plague, just hollywood.

Branched off wrote:

men like us already don’t buy their s~~~ anymore, so they don’t need us anymore

Except they do need us. “Ghostbusters” 2016 lost Sony at least $100 million, and probably more since they took a billion dollar write-down that year.

And they know it.

so they can continue to ignore us.

Ignore us? The constant blaming and shaming they do to try to get us to watch their crap and pay for their sh​it is the exact opposite of ignoring us.

I suspect their business model revolves around the soy boy generation

They don’t have a business model.

They have a political agenda.

That’s why they keep losing money trying to push the same crap using the same blame and shame methods and never, ever learn their lesson. Rinse. Repeat. At least until the studios go bankrupt.

uchibenkei wrote:

will encourage others not to watch it too.

No necessary.

NOBODY is going to pay to see this film. The word of mouth on it is already awful, and it doesn’t even have a script yet. Just a dumb concept and an idiot political agenda.

[Handsome VicParticipant 1711]

Faust For Science wrote:

Then you are blind.

Look at a few previous anti-white, anti-male movies. For example 2016 Ghostbusters. Those behind the film knowingly make a movie that is insulting to the fans, then when people point out the flaws in the movie and do not pay to go see the film, those making the film falsely accuse the fans of being “bigots”.

Such tactics are basically the SJWs attacking their targets while at the same time the SJWs are crying/claiming to be the “victim” in the situation.

Eh, that’s just bad judgement. Not evidence of a conspiracy. That garbage movie lost millions of dollars. Who’s funding this conspiracy? Seems like a bad business model, funding an anti-Western anti-white male crusade, to kill off the segment of society which generates the most income. When movie studios could instead make original movies that people want to see. But, that’s harder.

I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

[Handsome VicParticipant 1711]

sidecar wrote:

Then why are they casting one of Brie Larson’s anti-male, anti-West feminist bitch friends?

Because there isn’t a woman to be found who isn’t an anti-male, feminist bitch. AWALT

I'm going my own way. Maybe I'll see you there.

[Anonymous 0]

Handsome Vic wrote:

Because there isn’t a woman to be found who isn’t an anti-male, feminist bitch. AWALT

The heart of the problem. The reason Rome fell. And I studied the fall of Rome independently.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 23183]

Handsome Vic wrote:

Not evidence of a conspiracy.

Except the comments by the producers of the films in support of SJW beliefs.

[SandalsParticipant 4258]

Handsome Vic wrote:

I don’t think there’s a big anti-West, anti-male conspiracy behind this movie remake. I think it’s just a lazy ripoff. A man is at the centre of a successful and popular franchise (007)– so let’s remake it with a woman as the lead. A black woman. Oooh, look how progressive and edgy we are. Women invade male spaces, copy men, and take credit for men’s accomplishments all the time. Hollywood does remakes every day, they just have been taking them a step further.

Isn’t what you wrote the definition of an anti-west, anti-male conspiracy?

[SandalsParticipant 4258]

Handsome Vic wrote:

Eh, that’s just bad judgement. Not evidence of a conspiracy. That garbage movie lost millions of dollars. Who’s funding this conspiracy?

Who funds any conspiracy? There are answers to this question.

[D.B.D.Participant 1045]

Goodbye Mr. Bond. Spectre was your peak.

[The Black ScorpionParticipant 2311]

Let me take a wild guess:

The enemy in this Bond film will be a rich, old white guy.

The greatest tragedy in life is to spend your whole life fishing only to discover that it was not fish you were after. - Henry David Thoreau

[sidecarParticipant 35874]

Handsome Vic wrote:

Because there isn’t a woman to be found who isn’t an anti-male, feminist bitch. AWALT

But most of them are smart enough to keep quiet about it until they’ve locked down a wallet or two. The ones hollywood insists on casting aren’t.

Seriously, Bree Larson is an idiot.

The Black Scorpion wrote:

The enemy in this Bond film will be a rich, old white guy.

We’ll probably never know, because nobody is going to go see it to find out.

[Author]

Posts