Yahoo News says single men have nothing to live for.

[UnbelievableyetnotParticipant 512]

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/married-people-are-more-likely-to-survive-cancer-083016836.html

“Married people and people with families are more likely to stick to treatment. They have a support system making them go to chemo, reminding them to take their medication.

“They are also more motivated to seek out healthcare. To put it bluntly, they have something to live for.”

And how much of that de-motivation is down to articles and media like this sending the message that single men have nothing to live for?

“If you are single, you don’t have someone at home nagging at you to get checked out – this is particularly true with men. Women tend to have more support even if they are single.”

Yet married men are more likely to get cancer to begin with from all that nagging:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3474458

“Unexpected findings were significant deficits in risk for single, separated, and divorced white men as compared to the risk for married men.”

And of course they have a video at the bottom with man t~~~ in your face.

[SimpleTaterSpectator 56]

Typical feminazi attitude that men should live for women… it’s really sickening to see how such gross statements are being made.

HOW THE F~~~ can they portray nagging in a positive way? It’s one thing to remind a person what they might have forgotten, but f~~~ing NAGGING?? Nagging kills men. Yes it f~~~ing murders men. Nagging wives kill their husbands early. It is also a fact that single men have the lowest rate of heart disease. Women are f~~~ing murderers.

http://www.delawareonline.com/story/onlyindelaware/2014/05/09/nagging-men-women-research-death/8911995/
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200902/single-men-have-good-hearts

Monks have nothing to live for. hahaha… This article is so pathetic. Monks who follow the ancient culture (practice meditation, eat vegan and renounce women) have the longest lives. Cancer is almost unheard of among them. Their eyes, teeth, muscles etc. remain in great condition even when they are 100 years old. It is a scientific fact that their practices greatly improve both mental and physical well being.

Meanwhile, women’s rising influence since the 20th century has also led to sharply rising mental illnesses in society.

[EinherjarParticipant 608]

Hehehe, articles like these are instrumental when it comes to shaming men into marriage. Or to say it more directly; under the control of a woman. Usually the statistics used in this kind of research, have been deliberately misused or tampered with so that it can fit their agenda. It is an old tune they never get tired of.

Good find mate, articles such as these serve as nice examples of mass-manipulation. For all their fine words and explanations without a source, they fail to see the obvious: We know what they are up to.

Being single should be a red flag for doctors. If a cancer patient comes in without a family member or spouse, it should be a warning sign.

Haha, this statement is almost funny. With these to sentences all singles have hereby been generalized and put in one category. And if they can get some feminist professor to say these words, it can be sold of as the truth.

It goes without saying perhaps, that a single man going his own way, live with the greatest passion of all. It is why it is called freedom!

The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal - Aristotle (384 - 322 BC)

[Ronin De NiroParticipant 200]

From the comments:

Single women who own at least one badger and a wombat less than six months old and has an active interest in the songs of Cher is twice as likely to survive breast cancer than a single woman with a bearded dragon and an interest in basket weaving.

Utter nonsense!! married couples are more likely to divorce!!!!!!

Now THAT is data.

[HitmanParticipant]

Yahoo news can suck a dick.
F~~~ing retarded assholes twisting s~~~ around to make a story. ..
It’s NOT NEWS. .
It’s a STORY!
Like a fairytale story. .
Bulls~~~.

[Professor ChaosParticipant 489]

Bulls~~~. My single friends and coworkers are MUCH healthier and look younger than ones in marriages/long term relations~~~s.

Bachelors have more time to plan healthy meals, play sports, and workout.

Also, single guys have much less stress.

I always gained weight when I was in relations~~~s.

[Mr_OptionsParticipant 298]

A man without a woman is like a fish without a hook.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Hmmm…very interesting (ala Artie Shaw)

First
What studies? Where is the data?
Gender studies do NOT count

>”Research on nearly 60,000 people with a range of blood cancers found that married people had a 20% better chance of surviving, with single males faring the worst.”

What are the demographics of the control group?
Was the control group evenly distributed among all ethnicities, ages, genders, education, social status, sexual orientations?

My conclusion = more married people, a few single/divorced men to flesh out the desired results for this, lets not bring up the fact that there is more funds available for Cancer research/treatment for women only.
Meaning more men will naturally die due to cancer than women.

>”Data in the study, drawn from the California Cancer Registry between 2000 and 2009, included people with leukaemia, lymphoma and multiple myeloma.”

This indicates data gathered in California only.

My conclusion= Again skewed results, one region only, does not indicate likely “world wide” results.
Meaning married men, and men in relationships in California are more likely to contract blood cancers.

>”These results show that health services need to take more care of single patients, they need to be the surrogate for a spouse.”
My Conclusion = There it is right there gentlemen. Upcoming demands for more taxes especially taxes extorted from “single men”. Probably due to there being absolutely no “single women” to share in the financial burden.

>”At worst it can result in patients refusing treatment altogether”.
My Conclusion= Now if this isn’t the lamest shaming tactic ever.
A refusal of treatment will save the taxpayer a greater financial burden. Your body, your choice.

In summary
All men must leave California and NEVER visit there, as it is cancer causing environment, or Women in and from California are cancer causing agents. Both are plausible.

A “study” like this lends credence to Marriage is a cancer to mans soul.

Just my opinion based on my “study” of this report on a “study”.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[BrujahParticipant 579]

Along the same lines as that video encouraging men to marry as it has benefits like a better job to earn more money… to support a wife and kids… yeah.

Circular logic.

[BigDParticipant 3024]

Quick, someone go back in time and tell Tesla and Sir Isaac Newton they need to marry so they could have something to live for.

Don't stick your dick into anyone you aren't willing to put up with for eighteen years and nine months.

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

I couldn’t even imagine what married men have to go through. Almost every married man I know are working their ass off just to support their family. And they also half to keep their mouth shut pretty much all the time or else, if they talking back to their wives, their wives would start arguments and start nagging them even more.

That kind of life would be unbearable for me.

The MGTOW lifestyle is definitely a better choice. Health wise and financially.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[Masculine_ManParticipant 2735]

Let’s just entertain this study was fact. It still won’t change my mind with marriage. I’d rather battle cancer alone.

If it costs you your peace of mind, then it is too expensive.

[Anonymous 54]

Stress causes illness. Women cause stress.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Well, when they value men at 0, a man living for himself is the same as nothing to live for. I’m not 0 value.

Also, correlation doesn’t mean causation. Women tend to marry wealthier, healthier men. These will be men with careers, medical insurance, etc. Men equipped to battle cancer.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

I say manginas have nothing to live for.

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

Giving up all your hopes and dreams in your 20’s to get married and have kids sounds far worse.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Hmm.. so I die young? Great! I won’t have to worry about pension then.

Old people are not really respected anyway, those who are retired. Society views them as ‘extra baggage’ and confine them into old age homes with bossy matrons and nasty caretakers.

I’ll be glad to die after 50-52.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Unbelievableyetnot wrote:

They are also more motivated to seek out healthcare. To put it bluntly, they have something to live for.”

No, they have a nagging wife who will annoy the s~~~ outta the poor bloke to get treatment so she doesnt lose her income but of course use “what about our (now it’s ours instead of hers) kids?” to get your ass treatment. 99% of men would die for their kids, we don’t need some nagging f~~~ing wife to shame tactic us!

[Anonymous 22]

They are getting desperate.. and they’re going about it the wrong way, again.

They should address the real problem and try to figure out why so many men prefer to be single. Is there, perhaps, something wrong with today’s women?

[Author]

Posts