Wrap Your Head Around This

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

American women want to close the “pay gap.” They want to make the same amount of money as men in their workplace, but they want to date men who make MORE MONEY than them (so they can pay for entertainment, expensive wedding rings, bills, and the cost of raising their future children, etc.). Got that? We’re equal…but not when it comes to spending your paycheck.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[KeymasterKeymaster]

GOT IT. Now wrap your head around this……

Every single one of those greedy selfish women thinks a man should throw down $25K on a goddam engagement ring just to ask for permission to love her sorry fat ass until death. As you can see, this is a general/ universal female belief and they actually attempt to JUSTIFY IT!

Now tell the same bitches how long a man has to work to save $25K in after-tax savings. If he’s earning $50K a year and saves 10% he’s earning more than the average American HOUSEHOLD!! and if he saves 10% of that by Dec 31, he’s doing better than 93% of Americans too. Yet women think he should throw away FIVE YEARS of his labour away on her worthless ass. And they EXPECT this.

Now watch what happens when he EXPECTS her to make a goddam sammich which takes 5 minutes and $5 in ingredients. In order to be even with the ring alone, she would have to make him 3 sammiches a day for 165 years.

After seeing this disgusting video, I will never buy a woman as much as a CHEESEBURGER again.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[hollowtipsParticipant 681]

Woman expect anywhere from 30-100% of a mans paycheck in addition to keeping 100% of their own for themselves. Most woman until there late 20’s are carried by there parents until they find a unsuspecting male to dump the economic responsibility on them instead.

They literally expect complete compliance and servitude in a relationship/marriage and you get out of it, the bare minimum pussy which you could get single, without the headaches, time, and money.

We can’t earn more because that would mean we’d actually have a little f~~~ing money to spend on ourselves for a change.

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

Keymaster wrote:

After seeing this disgusting video, I will never buy a woman as much as a CHEESEBURGER again.

Good thing I never bought women anything to begin with. Women, especially modern women, are self entitled c~~~s. Women always expect men to pay s~~~ for them, yet, they never do the same for a man.

I was always indifferent to marriage/didn’t really think about it even in my blue pill years that much, but even when I did, I always thought it was such a stupid concept.

Why do women get a special day all to themselves that cost $20,000 or more, while also getting a $25,000 ring along with probably $10,000 worth of wedding gifts while men don’t even get so much as a flat screen TV, a new car, or a new computer?

I’ve always known weddings were only for women, which is why I always thought the whole concept was for self entitled c~~~s.

Buying s~~~ for women is a waste of resources. It’s literally p~~~ing your money down the drain.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Women and politicians have the same mindset-

Why spend your own $ when you can spend another’s.

I guess thats why there are so any women in politics,lol

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[HitmanParticipant]

F~~~ them and their expectations.
They want want and keep wanting. .
Like bottomless pits..whatever you throw in is wasted and lost forever.
ALL women operate on a “what have you done for me lately ” Mentality. .
Even if you get her the ring it’s value is lost on her. .

[narwhalParticipant]

What’s even more ridiculous is that if you manage to get a ring (or anything for that matter) at a discount, it is somehow an insult to her. It’s as if she thinks you don’t believe she’s worth full price. The one exception would be if you got the discount because you ‘know a guy’. You get makeup points for having connections.

As for the pay gap, you have to figure that the politicians and powers that be are aware that it’s all a lie. So why do they continue to push the lie? Where’s the motivation.

A few guesses:
– For the politician, it’s a easy way to get the woman’s vote. Even though you can’t deliver on closing the pay gap, you can pass a meaningless law, or claim your opponents prevented it. Women will never look into the details.

– For a high ranking feminist, perhaps they feel that it’s needed to draw attention to things that could be fix changed? Perhaps they think they can get more women CEOs and such if they draw attention to pay in general? Sort of an ends justifies the means concept?

– Perhaps the feminist wants to artificially raise the salaries of traditionally women held jobs? Perhaps have teachers and nurses paid the same as engineers and doctors? If that were the case, why not come out and say it?

– The feminist refuses to believe it a lie, because she feels like it’s true.

– Ultimate ‘ends justify the means’.The feminist does’t care that it’s a lie. She believes women must run the world by any means necessary.

All of it just seems stupid to me. Anyone pushing this lie is hurting the very people they claim to be helping.

Ok. Then do it.

[Biggvs_DickvsParticipant 3725]

hollowtips wrote:

We can’t earn more because that would mean we’d actually have a little f~~~ing money to spend on ourselves for a change.

That doesn’t make any sense. You mean we’re not able to earn more? WE’re not supposed to earn more? If you earn more in a marriage/engagement situation I’m pretty sure you wouldn’t be spending it on yourself. I honestly don’t get what you mean here.

narwhal wrote:

What’s even more ridiculous is that if you manage to get a ring (or anything for that matter) at a discount, it is somehow an insult to her. It’s as if she thinks you don’t believe she’s worth full price. The one exception would be if you got the discount because you ‘know a guy’. You get makeup points for having connections.

Ok, I gotta say that most of the women I’ve ever dated honestly were not like this. I admit, I never proposed to any of them, but I’m quite sure many/most of them would be quite happy with a simple gold band and access/control over all of my current and future earnings. It’s the little things…..

"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,

[narwhalParticipant]

Yes, I’m probably exaggerating a bit. It most certainly feels that way though. I bought my exes ring at a warehouse type place at about 30% off the normal retail. It definitely was something that I wanted to make sure she knew as I didn’t want to give any false impressions. And it was nowhere near a 2 month salary, which was supposable the standard at the time.

She always said she liked it, but I was always doubtful that she considered it to be enough. Maybe that was just my issue.

After we were divorced, I made it a point of telling her that I wasn’t going to ask for the ring back. She told me then that here plan was to give it to are daughter when she was old enough. I thought that was kinda strange as I can’t imagine she would want a reminder of her parents failed marriage. Recently, I was going through old boxes and found the original quality inspection (or whatever it’s called) on the value of the ring. I was going to give it to my ex, but she told me she no longer had it. I’m guessing she needed some quick funds or something.

If you think about it, wedding rings are a very odd tradition. It’s common for people to wear rings and such given to them as a reminder of the person who gave it to them. People will wear rings as a reminder of an earned achievement. People where something as a reminder of a commitment they’ve made it comes from the organization that holds them to that commitment, or something they gave to themselves. So why is the husband giving her a ring. Shouldn’t the ring come from the church that marries the couple, the government who enforces the marriage contract, or herself since she’s making the commitment?

I bought my own ring, and that felt like the way it was supposed to be. I was making the commitment and I had achieved nothing at that point. Why would she be buying it for me?

Ok. Then do it.

[Anonymous 54]

That’s so greedily absurd that even the pink shirt wearing mangina motherf~~~er is calling them out. Fat entitled selfish c~~~s.

[Anonymous 18]

Keymaster wrote:

In order to be even with the ring alone, she would have to make him 3 sammiches a day for 165 years.

S~~~, I love me sammiches. Those are some serious Popp University statistics tho. 165 years… She can make 3/day for all my family members. And some of you guys on here to even out the cost-benefit analysis.

[Buller100Participant 2189]

There is no pay gap, income is net matters not where it comes from.

A women earns $1000 a months, gets in tow with a Manginas he pays for everything, so a woman keeps what she earns…

$25000 ring, entitled etc etc..

Net is net, men fund women,, women always do better in divorce , always hypergamy ..

It’s more bulls~~~ , women earn more the men and the money from men what work do they do ?

[hollowtipsParticipant 681]

@BiggvsDickvs
What I mean’t was woman don’t think we should be allowed to earn more because if we earned more we’d have more money to spend on ourselves.

But we don’t earn more because their is no wage gap, but even if there was one, all married men hand a massive chunk of their money over to woman anyways. does that make sense?

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Keymaster wrote:

Every single one of those greedy selfish women thinks a man should throw down $25K on a goddam engagement ring just to ask for permission to love her sorry fat ass until death.

$25,000 (cough, cough, cough) ???!!!

Are you kidding me? Even if I was as rich as Bill Gates, that’s still too much money for some tacky finger ornament. What woman on God’s green earth is worth that much hard labor? Do single women have any idea how hard men work to pay for bills, food, etc.? Do they realize that people living in impoverished nations are risking their lives to dig precious diamonds from tunnels and getting paid pennies to do it? If the ring is that important, I suggest women GET MARRIED TO A RING instead of a real flesh & blood man.

To me, a woman that deserves an expensive ring is a woman that would never require me to buy one in the first place. She has a genuine fondness and appreciation for me that goes beyond material goods. This woman’s name is: MISS UNICORN.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8283]

Tuneout wrote:

Why spend your own $ when you can spend another’s.

Yep, they basically get paid to DO NOTHING. I’d also get excited about my wedding if I had a deal like that.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[Author]

Posts