Wow! Women Awarded Back Wages For Jobs They Never Had!

Topic by WhackerGuy2030

WhackerGuy2030

Home Forums MGTOW Central Wow! Women Awarded Back Wages For Jobs They Never Had!

This topic contains 13 replies, has 14 voices, and was last updated by Constantine  Constantine 3 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #257562
    +10
    WhackerGuy2030
    WhackerGuy2030
    Participant
    999

    Talk about bizzaro world! Link below. Short version. Feds went after a turkey butchering plant in MN for gender discrimination because there weren’t enough women working there. The lawsuit ends up getting settled. Company agrees to hire 53 women. Not 53 qualified individuals, but 53 sets of ovaries. Further, 338 women, WHOM WERE NEVER HIRED, will receive a cumulative settlement of $491,861 in back wages, for jobs THEY NEVER HAD.
    .
    Jennie-O will hire more women after federal discrimination lawsuit
    .
    And all this over a low wage disgusting job that most people would never have the stomach to do. What do you want to bet they will never find 53 women to actually take those jobs?
    .
    Do you suppose I can go back after my old employer for passing me over for a lateral move position because I was a man? Can I get back wages even though I had another job anyway?

    #257563
    +3
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    https://youtu.be/sZB7sO5ZoV8things

    have been “crazy ” for a while.
    this is really crazy !! hahahaha!!!

    #257568
    +7
    Klaus Windamier
    Klaus Windamier
    Participant
    543

    I don’t think there is any ‘only man’ job sign there? Then the most logical outcome would be : Because no woman would want to work there, for many reasons. (well, they only want a job with the highest income with probably a quarter or a half effort or as low as possible than it supposed to be).

    This company gonna have a hard time and the one that makes it go south is the federal itself. Your country killing it’s own growth by persecuting ridicolous things like this and make that like there is normal to suicide.

    Yes, 53 women, not 53 qualified individuals, that’s just idiotic. Feminism like to bring sexism, isn’t this sexist as it is being punished by the federal for not having enough woman to apply (yes, to apply by their own will, not because it has ‘man only’ policy) to work there?

    #257571
    +3
    Bob__
    bob__
    Participant
    946

    Feds went after a turkey butchering plant in MN for gender discrimination because there weren’t enough women working there.

    Women are the ones discriminating against the business by not wanting to work there (and actually have to do real work). Women want the cushy paper shuffling jobs where their pay is based on how many “degrees” they have and how long they’ve gotten away with not getting fired (i.e. “experience”). Not performance, but how long they’ve been there.

    #257572
    +2
    Experienced
    experienced
    Participant

    It’d be great if …. they’d force the women receiving that cash to have to productively hold those positions 20 years with the only opportunity for backing out being going to prison.
    Your mandatory position your choice.
    The blade cuts both ways – it’s a girly thing.

    "It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

    #257588
    +6

    Anonymous
    42

    The federal grubbermint are a bunch of SEXIST RACIST BIAS BIGOTS! Where THE F~~~ ARE THESE SORTS OF MANDATES WHEN IT COMES TO EDUCATION??????????????????

    ONLY WOMEN SUFFER! MEN ARE MUTHAF~~~IN BEASTS OF BURDEN! LASH LASH LASH! CRACK THAT WHIP!

    If you have a swinging dick, you’re white, and you dwell under condemnation of law, THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HAS MADE THEMSELVES YOUR ACHE F~~~ING ENEMY!

    I can agree WHOLE MUTHAF~~~ING HEARTILY with radicals when they chant DEATH TO AMERICA! AGREED!

    Only a GOD DAMNED FOOL WOULD LEND ASSISTANCE TO A MODERN PIECE OF S~~~ WOMAN!

    #257617
    +4
    Shiny
    Shiny
    Participant
    2307

    We should demand back wages for not being midwifes – the most discriminatory profession.

    #257632
    +2

    “EQUALITY”

    Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

    #257679
    +2

    Well, I won’t be buying turkey burgers from there anymore.

    #257681
    +3
    Photon_Man
    Photon_Man
    Spectator
    47

    Idiots giving resources to women…

    #257741
    +1
    Franky
    Franky
    Participant
    2338

    Women are running the show now, so the show will and continue to be nothing but concentrated bulls~~~.

    #257763
    +1
    WhoIsAsking
    WhoIsAsking
    Participant
    105

    For the same topic, the highest court in Switzerland, ruled into favour of a woman, a couple of weeks ago as well. And if I talk about the highest court in Switzerland, I of course mean the 3 all-female judges of 3 total judges in a Gender discussion, because….reasons.

    #257951
    Deadly Raver
    Deadly Raver
    Participant

    I’m wondering when.

    When will this s~~~ test we call modern feminism finally break the back of the men who support it? When will enough finally be,”enough”? When will the hammer fall and the ones who are biting the very hands that feed them get punched in their mouths? When?

    Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

    #258008
    +1
    Constantine
    Constantine
    Participant
    4420

    F~~~ing insane.

    As Klaus said, the majority of women don’t want jobs like that. If it was purely a matter of gender discrimination, there wouldn’t be any women working in that factory. If there are less women, it’s because they either don’t like the idea of working in such a place, or they weren’t qualified for the job when interviewed. Why is that so hard for people to put together? I once applied for a job at a bookshop. Although I had a lot of experience working in retail, I was beaten by somebody else. This was because my competition had previously been the manager of Borders for ten years. How lame would it be if I complained that this was blatant discrimination against people who’d never worked at Borders?

    For the most part, women only apply for jobs that they want to have. If a woman struggling to make ends meet came across an ad in the paper asking for turkey factory workers, she would probably say, “Ahhh…let’s see how we are at the end of the month.” Men, however, don’t have this kind of luxury. When men are still expected to support their families and pay for everything, they often have to take whatever jobs they can get.

    I just don’t understand this. There probably aren’t a great deal of dwarves working in that factory either. Is that discrimination? Dwarves need employment aswell. I demand that this company adjusts its policies so that it’s 50% tall people, and 50% dwarves! Hey, they demonstrated their diamond-mining capabilities in Snow White!

    Remember that photo that was posted on here recently, of the all-female staff at a company that I’ve forgotten the name of? How is it that nobody’s allowed to throw the discrimination book at them for not having enough men – no, for not having any men – in their employment?

    To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.