Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Would you vote for a woman for president
This topic contains 33 replies, has 24 voices, and was last updated by Anonymous 4 years, 5 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Hey, I am a moderate democrat, but I would never vote for Clinton. I noticed that Clinton has a good chance of winning the nomination, unfortunately and Fiorina has shot up in the polls after the last debate, so would you vote for a female if she seems qualified? Thoughts?
Anonymous42I’m prohibited from voting by judicial decree, with executive order to CEASE AND DESIST since 1997. The republic is dead…
Well if she is just “qualified” it depends on who else is better for the job however if she is simply the best guy for the job then yes why not? I don’t take the whole gender equality s~~~ but that doesn’t mean that individual men or women can’t do the other sides job better than most others or maybe even better.
It all depends on how capable the person is in my humble opinion.Voting is just giving consent to be governed. Absolutely not.
If a woman wants to be president she can text me first and ASK FOR MY CONSENT.
And if she doesn’t, she can go f~~~ herself. Just like dating.That’s called holding her to her own ideals. Women HATE that s~~~.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
Anonymous1I don’t vote. Period.
Either man or woman, politicians nowadays are just criminals with a bigger (public) budget.
And its not just on the USA.
Cheers.
Don’t vote. It just encourages the bastards!
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Hell.
No.
Fuck this planet.Even if voting were sensible….. you can’t vote for someone who isn’t prepared to grab a sword and charge into battle ahead of everyone else and DIE for the people they wish govern. That’s how a woman “governs” a marriage and a home – with her f~~~ing arms folded…. expecting YOU to take out the trash,
Hitlery couldn’t even keep her MARRIAGE together. She couldn’t even please her own husband! And someone thinks she can run a COUNTRY? What crack are these people on?
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.The potential for a nuclear war starting ‘because drama’ scares the living s~~~ out of me. No thanks.
The potential for a nuclear war starting ‘because drama’ scares the living s~~~ out of me. No thanks.
Exactly.
In order for a women to be president she has to first be able to define and understand “strength” and “power”. Women never can.
Strength is communicating: “I could but I won’t”.
No woman will ever teach you that. But a man will.•••••
To a woman… “strength” is “I CAN!!! AND I WILLL!!! YOU BASTARD!!!!!”
•••••
Imagine that on a NATIONAL scale. “That country is ignoring us!! Im gonna teach them a LESSON now. HA HA!!!” That’s how women run their personal lives….. over….. and over…. and over again. Starting violent, destructive, domestic wars and drama out of NOTHING – just for being left alone .
“I’m not getting enough attention so I’m gonna push the red button now”.
Dear god it would be an unspeakable nightmare.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Nope. I wouldn’t even vote. I just don’t care for politics and how to handle things, because let’s just face it: no one can come to a consensus about anything. I would most likely vote for a male president than a female president (assuming I even voted), but I’m just now going to even get involved in this stuff.
Only if the Libertarian Party chooses to put up a female candidate.
The potential for a nuclear war starting ‘because drama’ scares the living s~~~ out of me. No thanks.
I tried the two party route, and prefer being the minority that screws one of those candidates out of a vote to choosing the lesser of two evils just because I think they’ll ass rape me less.
I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.
I think Margaret Thatcher did a decent job; there was actually a DECREASE in the percent of GDP consumed by government during her prime ministership. Obviously, she alone wasn’t responsible for that, but she was certainly a STRONG leader. I’d definitely vote for her, over, say, Neville Chamberlain, haha. Any downward trend in government as a percent of GDP demands respect in my book.
I would also argue Angela Merkel isn’t too bad historically either, though recently she’s sadly bought into the feminist malarky (must need some votes): http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/womens-politics/11651033/Angela-Merkel-Germanys-Chancellor-is-finally-having-a-feminist-moment.html
Ogre: Actually, the first woman to receive an electoral vote for Vice President of the US was libertarian Toni Nathan. She ran in 1972.
And yes, I agree, the ass-raping/government growth is reduced if you don’t elect a majority of one party over the other. Glorious gridlock. Hey, at least it prevents MORE government expansion! So a Democratic president & Republican Congress, or vice versa, go well together!
There were plenty of women out there that seemed qualified enough to marry.
If you can trust that then go ahead and vote for a woman.
"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.
Interesting to see other MGTOW view points, I thought everyone would just say no.
When Bill and Hill were pres last time there was a big “joke” going around about the king and queen of America. Scared yet?
Former Minnesota Gov. J. Ventura would get my vote, if I voted.nope , not a chance..no woman will get my vote , great video’s….point made !
I’m glad everyone agrees! I always said it would be bad for a woman on her period to have access to ICBM’s.
Fuck this planet.
Anonymous42Would you guys vote if there was a nobody for president check box? I mean like vacate the office for the next 4 years, congress and all elections too? I know I would go out of my way to vote for nobody at each and every election! Now that’s a third party worth considering!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678