Would you date a transexual?

[TheroniusParticipant 975]

I reckon I’ll pass.

"I am is reportedly the shortest sentence in the English language. Could it be that I do is the longest sentence?" - George Carlin

[MichaelSpectator 544]

Beer wrote:

I just don’t see the big deal. Men have sex with women and I don’t care. Men have sex with men and I don’t care. If a guy wants to have sex with a surgically altered version of either…why would I care?

If its not your thing I can understand that, and I’d be p~~~ed if I was in a situation where I was purposefully deceived into thinking he was a woman until I found out the hard(no pun intended) way…but at the same time I’d just leave…its not worth beating the s~~~ out of someone and losing my job and doing jail time over something so dumb.

Michael wrote:

You don’t find this kind of gender re-defining in stable cultures where men are in charge like Iran or other middle eastern countries today.

Throughout history quite a few societies have actually had ambiguous genders, third genders, etc…its just the full on sex change is a new concept because the technology wasn’t there 100 years ago.

Maybe sex changed trannies aren’t too common or accepted in Iran or some other middle eastern countries today…but guess what…those same countries men gang bang little boys for fun, so you sir are simply retarded if you are trying to act like those countries are somehow less f~~~ed up than ours unless you think a child getting gang raped by full grown men is somehow better than two consenting adults doing whatever together.

Ok then. Name three civilizations with ambiguous genders. Name two. Name one. If you’re trying to say that transsexual mental disease has always existed – you’re correct. If you’re trying to imply that gender ambiguity is an accepted hallmark of ancient society’s – name one. Let me guess. Ancient Sparta right?

When I first learned there were such a thing as “transsexual escorts” used by heterosexual males I asked myself what kind of mentally depraved sick man would actually pay for this service? And who would’ve thought I they would be on a MGTOW forum? This topic has nothing do to with MGTOW.

Any man who is so desperate for female companionship he would even CONSIDER taking a fake female over a real one is just so far off the deep end it belongs as a new mental disease in the Psych Diagnostic and Statistical Manual.

Now your deflecting the entire conversation onto pedo’s in Middle Eastern/Muslim countries? Ok. What’s your point? Murder’s Pedo’s and other sick individuals exist in all societies. You point out the exception to the rule in Muslim countries and? Not sure what this has to do with tranny’s or why you would even bring that up. And by the way this behavior is also NOT tolerated by Muslim countries.

Re-defining gender is a hallmark of today’s feminist movement. Feminism deliberately undermines societies. Period. I thought that was a basic common sense understanding for anyone driven to these forums???? I honestly think this entire thread is from a troll or disinformation employee.

I’ve been around manosphere forums for a long time and have never run into a thread trying to legitamize tranny’s as a proxy for MGTOW. That’s just f~~~ing sick man. BTW this entire thread has nothing to do with MGTOW.

Trannies are males who believe they are females with a 50% death rate by age 30.

Honestly I have no idea why this is even being discussed on a MGTOW forum other than for reasons stated previously.

I’m outta here!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Michael wrote:

P.S. I’m not sure if you’re the webmaster but if you are could you please put your quotes in quotations because I can’t figure out how. Thank you.

You don’t need to be a webmaster to know how it works. Select the text you want to quote. Click the “quote” button and it will trow it into the compose window. I re-formatted your reply so it isn’t an eye sore. You’re welcome.

Michael wrote:

I don’t need to “question” banging a trans-sexual. Maybe you do. I don’t. I’m well beyond that. If you need to “question” banging a transsexual that’s that’s your confusion to deal with.

I will not respond to your snyde sarcasm and deflections. I wasn’t talking about ME being “confused” about this, and neither were YOU originally. You were speaking about the OP. So attempting that BULLS~~~ will not work. Wrong website and you will f~~~ off with that dishonest s~~~ if you want an ounce of credibility.

You are REQUIRED to be honorable here and agree to it when you join.
I “questioned” NOTHING and the first words out of my mouth on the subject were “absolutely not”.

The OP posed the question. Is there really a need to remind you.

Michael wrote:

You sure about that? What if you were “gay” and the man you thought you were bringing home was a CHICK.

Sure you can. You commented on a hypothetical about bashing a tranny and kicking the s~~~ out of him. No problem with that hypothetical. So why the sudden change in values?

You argue your point like a c~~~.

Michael wrote:

You’re wrong. Violence is acceptable to defend my life liberty or property or someone else’s life liberty or property

But that wasn’t the situation when you justified your violence.
It is not acceptable in the situation that you were speaking about.

Backpedalling is for vagina owners. Not these forums.
If you’re going to withdraw a statement, just withdraw it.

Because I am honorable, I will withdraw the word “never” and will go on the record to justify violence — if my life is being threatened.

Michael wrote:

Dude. That’s a movie. It’s fake.

Yes you f~~~ing idiot. I f~~~ing TOLD you it’s a movie. You argued physical violence and by using reverse-the-gender (and other examples) we can illustrate how much of a f~~~ing hypocrite you are.

Michael wrote:

Just trying to be a man and have principles. Sorry if that offends you.

You can f~~~ off with your c~~~ing sarcasm. Your “principals” were already called out as ass-backwards.

EXAMPLE:

Michael wrote:

Why use force when you can deceive?

Michael wrote:

I’m “suggesting” that if I was set up, conned, deceived into sex/physical contact by a transsexual , as described above I would assault them.

You’re just one c~~~radiction after another.
Go away and sort yourself out. You’re a waste of bandwidth.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Michael wrote:

Ok then. Name three civilizations with ambiguous genders. Name two. Name one. If you’re trying to say that transsexual mental disease has always existed – you’re correct. If you’re trying to imply that gender ambiguity is an accepted hallmark of ancient society’s – name one. Let me guess. Ancient Sparta right?

Samoans had the Fa’afafine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fa'afafine

Many civilizations(Greeks included) had eunuchs who were often castrated early enough to not go through proper male puberty
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eunuch

Thailand had(has) Kathoeys
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathoey

Third genders, ambiguous genders, and genital alteration aren’t exactly new things…its just modern medicine with hormone treatments and reassignment surgeries have brought the whole sex change thing to a whole new level.

Michael wrote:

Now your deflecting the entire conversation onto pedo’s in Middle Eastern/Muslim countries? Ok. What’s your point? Murder’s Pedo’s and other sick individuals exist in all societies. You point out the exception to the rule in Muslim countries and? Not sure what this has to do with tranny’s or why you would even bring that up. And by the way this behavior is also NOT tolerated by Muslim countries.

You are the one that brought up middle eastern countries like they were somehow superior because sex changes aren’t as accepted there…I was simply pointing out a bunch of little boy f~~~ers are even worse than some grown adult who wants his pecker turned inside out.

Michael wrote:

Re-defining gender is a hallmark of today’s feminist movement. Feminism deliberately undermines societies. Period. I thought that was a basic common sense understanding for anyone driven to these forums???? I honestly think this entire thread is from a troll or disinformation employee.

Ambiguous genders aren’t really new though, as I’ve already provided proof of above. What feminists are f~~~ing up in society is they want to redefine what a woman is…only they want to keep all the benefits of being a woman while doing away with the traditional responsibilities of being a woman…all while expecting men to keep fulfilling the traditional male role.

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

According to John Hopkins Medical Center, one of the most recognized and prestigious Medical centers in the world AND who began transgender operations, have stopped doing these operations and asserting, based on science, that transgender conditions are a mental disorder. Do a google search. One of the main doctrines of MGTOW is DO NOT DATE MENTALLY ILL WOMAN..
God Bless, Michael

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Michael wrote:

@ Eric

Your the same guy posting propaganda suggesting European males should roll over and get cucked as PC cowards in the face of an obvious invasion right?

Your correct there is no deceptive fraud in the original posters specific example here. I agree.

In regards to your second point: God or nature (whichever you believe in does not matter) has already defined who is “male” and “female”. Exceptions to the rules like hemophrodites not withstanding. We don’t need to “redefine” who is male/female. This kind of thinking strikes to the core of what is seriously wrong with modern Western societies today; and it’s been implemented intentionally to weaken males and destroy cultures.

You don’t find this kind of gender re-defining in stable cultures where men are in charge like Iran or other middle eastern countries today.

I have no comment on your third, forth, and fifth points. Sorry to hear that. Not sure how you allowed yourself to get in that kind of position. I generally avoid fat ugly women. However these points are irrelevant to the post.

Our society is not “stable”: it’s changing. We have to be open minded if we want things like sex robots and surrogated motherhood (aka children for single men) and then artificial wombs (that will be the best solution). Otherwise the alternative is an alliance between the church and feminists: the pope already said that men who don’t marry are chauvinists who oppress wimminz, and here in Italy feminists are allied with the church against surrogated motherhood. Feminists get their way because they’re manipulative, liars, flexible and cunning, they don’t have problems betraying their supposed “ideals” when it fits their goal: matriarchy. We have see it with sex: second wave was overwhelmingly sex positive – “more f~~~ing for all!” seemed the idea – now they’re rolling back, and that’s natural, because women are far less interested about sex than men. Their next move will be a roll back on marriage: in Italy they’re already turning cohabitations in marriages, WITH ALIMONIES WHEN IT ENDS. But in their idea the new “marriage” will be female-dominated…the idea of feminists is: NO HETERO SEX FOR MEN OUTSIDE A STABLE RELATIONSHIP WITH A WOMAN, AND THE ALTERNATIVES ARE BEING VERY SUBMISSIVE WITHIN SUCH RELATIONSHIP (AND PAYING ALIMONIES WHEN IT ENDS) OR CELIBACY – no one-night stands (unless it’s the woman asking for it – all approachs by men will be outlawed), no sex work, no sex robots, no porn. They would even ban fleshlights, but that’s very difficult because they want to keep dildos.
I never posted “propaganda”: I just don’t think common men should bother so much about “poor sexually assaulted wimminz” – there’s police for that, and there are more important issues pertaining men – like suicides and deaths on the workplace.
Also, let’s talk straight: feminists are inflating, more and more, the definition of rape, and they always get their way. Why? Because our society don’t know anymore what real rape is. Muslims are now just reality-checking our society about what really rape is.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Nope!
Anymore stupid questions?

[JosephParticipant 125]

The plot thickens:

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/real-life-stories/transexual-demands-10000-nhs-sex-4356169

[KeithParticipant 482]

Is being the judge of other people’s intimate/private relationships, connections or interests an elected position or a self-appointed one?

If you don’t have a dog in the fight, why care about the outcome?

All cats are grey in the dark.

ONCE UPON A TIME there was a man who never found a wife and he lived happily ever after. The End.

[JosephParticipant 125]

Keith wrote:

Is being the judge of other people’s intimate/private relationships, connections or interests an elected position or a self-appointed one?

If you don’t have a dog in the fight, why care about the outcome?

All cats are grey in the dark.

Not exactly (all due respect). I would f~~~ a butterface with a nice body, but in the same way I wouldn´t f~~~ a fattie in the dark, I wouldn´t f~~~ someone with more body hair than I do, even if she shaves it.

Then again, I fully support you on the dog fight thing. None of my business. I wouldn´t do it, but if others do more power to them.

[Author]

Posts