World Cup Russia 2018: women are entitled bigots

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

In 2018, people are far less willing to stand for any form of harassment or unwanted sexual advances than ever before.

Needless to say, the Weinstein scandal was a huge catalyst in this. When news of the scandal broke in October last year, no one could have predicted the domino effect it would have across the entire entertainment industry, sparking many other allegations of sexual harassment and assault.

Watch the uncomfortable moment here:

Female Reporter Destroys Soccer Fan Who Tried To Kiss Her During Live Broadcast

“Don’t do this. Never do this again, okay?” Guimarães tells him. “I’m sorry, sorry, okay, okay,’” he replies away from camera shot.

Guimarães continues: “I don’t allow you to do that, never. Okay? This is not polite. This is not right. Never do this. Never do this to a woman, okay? Respect.”

“It’s awful. I feel helpless, vulnerable. This time I gave an answer, but it’s sad, people do not understand. I wanted to understand why he thinks he has a right to do that.”

WOW!
I mean, just WOW!
This is really unrespectful!
We shouldn’t care that the guy was actually relatively handsome compared to the somewhat masculine/ugly Julia Guimares, it’s still unrespectful!
It’s unfair!
It’s harassment!

No, it isn’t

LOL

MEN are AWESOME

WOMEN ARE BIGOTS

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[WallyParticipant]

I can’t blame the woman for being p~~~ed and the South Korean guy should not have take that. No one should have to tolerate that crap. But I see the double standards applied.

"what a waste of a life, to marry, give up your freedom, just for the hope of not dying alone. Don't get married Son."

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Wally wrote:

I can’t blame the woman for being p~~~ed and the South Korean guy should not have take that. No one should have to tolerate that crap. But I see the double standards applied.

I think it’s actually the opposite: in an ideal, nice and tolerant society the right reaction would be that of the South Korean, for both sexes.
But women are simply uncapable of that.

Women pretend to be equal to men but can’t handle a kiss on the cheek like a man can: women are hysterical, indeed the female reporter wasn’t threatened, point here being that women can’t handle a light-hearted joke.
Women NEVER had been able to handle a kiss on the cheek like a man can, women’s reactions were less hysterical 20-30 years ago but still less good than men’s, now women’s hysteria is much more evident since feminism has totally liberated female nature.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[DorkShitParticipant 4353]

She’s a serious news reporter doing important work. She is so important that she had to make her own news.

Bitter old hag is all I see.

Peace brothers

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I wish people weren’t so paranoid about other people. A nice compliment, a nice gesture or comment. A nice kiss on the cheek or pat on the ass. Letting your hand slip a little to far down the lower back.

Who cares. When you react you just give them power. And being nice has it’s own rewards.

But then again I’m Italian/American so all bets are off.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I wish people weren’t so paranoid about other people. A nice compliment, a nice gesture or comment. A nice kiss on the cheek or pat on the ass. Letting your hand slip a little to far down the lower back.

Who cares. When you react you just give them power. And being nice has it’s own rewards.

But then again I’m Italian/American so all bets are off.

Sometimes being paranoid is a good idea.
Example, right now: 5 minutes ago there was unknown people ringing at my door. I did not even answer.
5 minutes before the door ringed it was the door phone ringed, I answered and the voice of an apparently teen girl asked me if I’m the man of the telephone company, and that I sold her a wrong phone card, asking if I could so she could show me the phone card. I said “NO”.
Evidently, the teen girls ringed to someone else who opened the buliding door, and then they walked to my door, ringing.
There’s a street party out there.
This “paranoid” man thinks that 98% chances are that those teens are some friends of the 15 yo girlfriend of my son, probably drunk or under drugs (she’s 15 but she smoke cigarettes and drink beer): the thing of the phone card was just an excuse, I never worked for a phone company and this is a private house, not a shop.
I don’t want be accused of something, chances are actually slight, but I don’t care.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

She is Brazilian.
Here a kiss in the cheek means being friendly.
It is JUST LIKE A HUG for brazilians…

She is just playing the bitch, she just want someone to yell at and a reason.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

She’s trying out her feminist words of armor. “You don’t have permission to touch me”. It didn’t work, our fine fellow knew that he was poking the bear and was having a good time doing it. Nice.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I think that deep down, almost all women are trained to believe that any physical affection from them is so enormously valuable that NO ONE should ever get even a tiny sample of it without paying for it. Money, attention, status, dinner, flowers etc… And they figure out soon enough that they don’t really have much else of any value to offer in exchange for everything else the want/need. So when some guy gives them a kiss on the cheek, he isn’t just stealing money, or its equivalent from her, he is stealing the only thing she has that has any worth at all. Hence the hysterical reaction – which is indistinguishable from the reaction you’d get trying to steal food from the plate of a starving refugee woman.

True enough, unwanted touching is still a criminal offense. But the impact of the tiny gesture does not justify the hysterical response. She is not raped, robbed, assaulted or injured. But she’s p~~~ed that something she thinks is valuable, this guy is not willing to pay anything for. And those women who kissed the Korean reporter? They believe the same thing as the first woman, but to them, they’ve just give him an unearned gift. They probably believe they are generous, and he should be grateful.

And so the bottom line is that NONE of these women believe themselves equal to men. They believe themselves, or at the very least they believe that their physical affection, is far superior in value to a man’s.

If that reporter really believed in equality, he would have maced them both.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[experiencedParticipant]

FFS.
His target wasn’t even the center of her cheek.
It was her cheekbone right up by her eye.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

BrainPilot wrote:

I think that deep down, almost all women are trained to believe that any physical affection from them is so enormously valuable that NO ONE should ever get even a tiny sample of it without paying for it. Money, attention, status, dinner, flowers etc… And they figure out soon enough that they don’t really have much else of any value to offer in exchange for everything else the want/need. So when some guy gives them a kiss on the cheek, he isn’t just stealing money, or its equivalent from her, he is stealing the only thing she has that has any worth at all. Hence the hysterical reaction – which is indistinguishable from the reaction you’d get trying to steal food from the plate of a starving refugee woman.

Bingo.

BrainPilot wrote:

She is not raped, robbed, assaulted or injured. But she’s p~~~ed that something she thinks is valuable, this guy is not willing to pay anything for. And those women who kissed the Korean reporter? They believe the same thing as the first woman, but to them, they’ve just give him an unearned gift. They probably believe they are generous, and he should be grateful.

And so the bottom line is that NONE of these women believe themselves equal to men. They believe themselves, or at the very least they believe that their physical affection, is far superior in value to a man’s.

If that reporter really believed in equality, he would have maced them both.

Bingo, again.

And such mentality have been entrenched in the law: that’s very often, almost always, when the wife’s income is twice or thrice than his income, after a separation he receives NO money.
Because alimony is even (if not mainly) meant to pay the woman for the affection/sex she gave during the marriage contract: her affection/sex is being viewed as much more worthy than his.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[AttonParticipant]

She is unf~~~able to begin with.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Author]

Posts