Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Women to serve in close combat roles in the British military
This topic contains 22 replies, has 18 voices, and was last updated by
jack reacher 3 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Looks like Britain is allowing women to fight in close combat as well.
And now British women are reacting the same way American women reacted.
Kate Medina said:
We are physically different from men. It is a biological fact that the average women has a third less upper body strength and when it the comes to hand-to- hand combat – a fight to the death one-on-one; woman against a man – we will be at a physical disadvantage.
Hey, you c~~~s wanted equality and now you got it. Don’t come crying to us now.
I find this entertaining as hell. Women wanted equality, but now when it’s given to them on a silver plater, they reject it if it doesn’t benefit them in anyway.
Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.
“Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.”
GET THAT OUTFIT ON, MAGGOT! SHUT THE F~~~ UP! TO THE FRONT LINE! CHAAAARGE!
*splat* *maim* *limbs everywhere* *women crying hysterically* *f~~~ton of bombs raining down, accompanied by some sort of toxic gas* *all women die*
Welcome to equality, bitches!
"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K
Now that they have to deal with some of the negative side effects of being a man, they back track so hard. Turn the f~~~ around now that they have to put their money where their mouth is. Of course, general policy is, at least in the states, is for women to get pregnant to avoid combat deployments. And of course the military will let them stay and all that.
Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.
If they want to play soldier, so be it. I do feel for the fighting men who’ll be put at risk by these little girls, not to mention having to listen to their crap in an already stressful situation.
Now that they have to deal with some of the negative side effects of being a man, they back track so hard. Turn the f~~~ around now that they have to put their money where their mouth is. Of course, general policy is, at least in the states, is for women to get pregnant to avoid combat deployments. And of course the military will let them stay and all that.
If I were I high up in military I’d say “f~~~ it, don’t care if you got pregnant. You have a duty to your country. Now report to your officer!”
"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

Anonymous3Last time I checked, you were all strong, independent women who don’t need no stinkin weakling men.
Tungus Khan wrote:
Last time I checked, you were all strong, independent women who don’t need no stinkin weakling men.This.
To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell
I thought Britain (Europe) already have a population problem…
So are they doing this because there aren’t enough ‘men’ soldiers, or are they doing this so that women will become all ‘reproductive-mode-on’ and produce more babies?A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
I would not want to go on any mission with a female. I don’t care how tough or strong they are, nor do i care how accurate they are with a weapon. Here’s why …
It is not in female nature to place herself in grave danger for a man, what do we hear time and time again when s~~~ goes down ? “HEROIC BOYFRIEND TAKES BULLET FOR GIRLFRIEND WHEN GUNMAN OPENED FIRE”
As men, we can place our bet that our fellow man has no problem being the first in the door and taking fire, and in some cases, has no problem with diving on a grenade to save the lives of his unit. Would a women ? I highly doubt it.
If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.
women can do anything a man can do
I hope men give these women some white feathers
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
When women start getting their heads smashed in on the battle field, war comes to an end.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
How many of those trollops are going to falsely accuse male soldiers of rape so they can sue the military?
Yeah, how nice.
You guys should see them p~~~ and s~~~ their pants in supporting roles let alone up front where
you eat dirt from mortars and spaying bullets.Zero Tolerance
almost makes me want to go to war against the uk, except the likelihood of hand to hand these days are slim and none. they’re worried and complaining about nothing.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Liberals are useful idiots. Once they have fulfilled their purpose of ushering in the new socialist order, the gooberment wont need them anymore and they will be the first ones to go.
You have to feel sorry for the men who will be assigned to active combat roles with these women. A man and two ladies going up against a squad of ISIS men- what could go wrong?
Well the front line women will probably demand to be promoted to generals anyway. Maybe the women can get some designer shoes to coordinate with their combat fatigues.
The military should just enforce birth control (Shot, or IUD), or force abortions.
“My body, my right”
F~~~ you bitch, for the rest of your service term your ass BELONGS TO THE QUEEN, and she says “Suck it up, Buttercup”
“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard
I went through basic training and have vivid memories of the 4 broads who had a chit to get out of PT one morning. That is 4 broads and only 4 broads.
The rest of us were up at 0500 running circuits while all handing off full jerry cans to each other, at the same time wearing gas masks, and the “sick” bitches got to polish artillery rounds sitting on their asses.
Even with affirmative action policies and cushy non combat roles, bitches are at about 25-30 percent of most western forces. Many stories of them getting knocked up when deployment approaches, look at the stats for deaths and injuries during deployment, its still the guys.
But the Army’s research suggests fewer than 5% of its 7,000 women would pass the current infantry fitness test.
So why on earth are they in the military?
I also think a blanket approach to opening up all ground combat roles to women is too ‘cookie-cutter’.
I see no reason why women couldn’t serve in front line armoured regiments that aren’t quite as physically demanding as, say, the infantry. These units do see direct combat, but the soldiers are ‘mounted’ in fighting vehicles, so there is less physical fitness required and they do not engage in hand-to-hand combat unless their vehicle is disabled and over-run by the enemy.
I’m sure men would love to be afforded this opportunity.
But the Army’s research suggests fewer than 5% of its 7,000 women would pass the current infantry fitness test.
So why on earth are they in the military?
I also think a blanket approach to opening up all ground combat roles to women is too ‘cookie-cutter’.
I see no reason why women couldn’t serve in front line armoured regiments that aren’t quite as physically demanding as, say, the infantry. These units do see direct combat, but the soldiers are ‘mounted’ in fighting vehicles, so there is less physical fitness required and they do not engage in hand-to-hand combat unless their vehicle is disabled and over-run by the enemy.
I’m sure men would love to be afforded this opportunity.
This is exactly what bothers me about women in military. Even if they are in front line combat units, i believe they’ll still find a way to waffle their way out of it. So what should happen, is they should have a seperate boot camp where they are trained for support roles. Everyone saying “good these bitches will get what they asked for” don’t understand that they actually won’t, they will get recognition from everyone for making the cut, and in the end, they will never see a day of CQC.
If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
