Women now paying services with sex in the Netherlands

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Check it with a translator:
http://www.at5.nl/artikelen/150703/sekswerk
Due economic crisis, in the Netherlands women are paying in sex rather in money services like plumbering, fixing computers, driving lessons, and so on.
Seriously 😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[RoyDalParticipant]

It’s the logical extension of paying for dinner, drinks, and a show with sex. Call it dating, call it prostitution, it’s all trading one service for another.

It is an interesting fact that prostitution was permitted in the USA’s early days. It became illegal due to the efforts of ‘respectable’ women.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

I find this sad.

[The Skank SpankerParticipant 1372]

Quite saddening that women are allowed to pay by using sex. This demonstrates female shallowness once again. It was even approved in court of law after they took it to court I believe.

This is what the world has come to, another privilege for women has now been enabled.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Faust For Science wrote:

I find this sad.

It’s female nature unleashed.
In the wild women who traded sex for resources have more chance to survive, on average.
The old concept of marriage was just a compromise between the need for sex of men and the need of support of women. As long as women had been taught to keep are of their husband, the system, even if with a lot of flaws (even many issues affecting women, I’m very fair about it), had worked. Now, since women are generally taught that happiness of their husbands is not so important, the very idea of marriage is in deep crisis.
My idea is that 20 years from now, 2035, due actual educational gender gap, women will control about 60% of the economy, but it’ll be very hard times for at least an half women because men will still have about 40% and men willingly to share their resources with a woman will be unicorns.
In other words women with money will never bother to marry, because they will not need resources, but all other women, at least an half, will be totally desperate, and such things like trading services for sex will be extremely common.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

I might give a discount but not below cost.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Eric Lauder wrote:

In the wild women who trade sex for resources have more chance to survive, on average.

That is ironic considering how little prostitutes are regarded in western society.

Eric Lauder wrote:

The old concept of marriage was just a compromise between the need for sex of men and the need of support from women. As long as women had been taught to keep are of their husband, the system, even if with a lot of flaws (even many issues affecting women, I’m very fair about it), had worked. Now, since women are generally taught that happiness of their husbands is not so important, the very idea of marriage is in deep crisis.

I have talked about that too, on this forum. While it might have been a comprise, it was a comprise that both men and women got positive goals from.

Eric Lauder wrote:

My idea is that 20 years from now, 2035, due actual educational gender gap, women will control about 60% of the economy, but it’ll be very hard times for at least an half women because men will still have about 40% and men willingly to share their resources with a woman will be unicorns.
In other words women with money will never bother to marry, because they will not need resources, but all other women, at least an half, will be totally desperate, and such things like trading services for sex will be extremely common.

The irony is not lost on me.

Women are taught they are better than men, but they also taught to only marry up from their social status.

Women do not want men to be successful, but women will only date successful men.

This is the embodiment of insanity.

[RennieParticipant]

RoyDal wrote:

It is an interesting fact that prostitution was permitted in the USA’s early days. It became illegal due to the efforts of ‘respectable’ women.

Another anti-competitive action no doubt.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

The Skank Spanker wrote:

Quite saddening that women are allowed to pay by using sex. This demonstrates female shallowness once again. It was even approved in court of law after they took it to court I believe.

This is what the world has come to, another privilege for women has now been enabled.

I don’t think is a “privilege”: theoretically both sexes are allowed to trade sex for services. Practically, yes, it benefits women.
But since it benefits women by expanding their freedom rather than limiting the freedom of men, it cannot be harmful for men (at least, not harmful for wise men) and on the long run it may be even somewhat beneficial for men because more and more women’s true nature will be exposed, more and more men will wake up.
I bet there’s alot of feminists opposing it: radfems are aware that power for women is mainly gained limiting men’s freedom, much more than by expanding women’s freedom, and they’re even aware that too much freedom can be harmful to women themsthemselves. That’s why, in example, radfems oppose prostitution, pornography and sex robots (including, therefore, even hypotetical male sex robots for women).
Julie Burchill, radfem, always said that the most liberal sexual ideas make the world a worst place for women…

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

I find this sad.

It’s female nature unleashed.
In the wild women who traded sex for resources have more chance to survive, on average.
The old concept of marriage was just a compromise between the need for sex of men and the need of support of women. As long as women had been taught to keep are of their husband, the system, even if with a lot of flaws (even many issues affecting women, I’m very fair about it), had worked. Now, since women are generally taught that happiness of their husbands is not so important, the very idea of marriage is in deep crisis.
My idea is that 20 years from now, 2035, due actual educational gender gap, women will control about 60% of the economy, but it’ll be very hard times for at least an half women because men will still have about 40% and men willingly to share their resources with a woman will be unicorns.
In other words women with money will never bother to marry, because they will not need resources, but all other women, at least an half, will be totally desperate, and such things like trading services for sex will be extremely common.

More chance of survival? Not really.
C~~~s who want to live the slut lifestyle are more likely to die from cervical cancer without the proper healthcare, most of these have a good chance of being dead in their early 50’s. I personal know a couple who have this, ones in her mid 30’s, the other in her mid 20’s, and their not healthy people, in fact they have health problems all the time.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Eric Lauder wrote:

My idea is that 20 years from now, 2035, due actual educational gender gap, women will control about 60% of the economy, but it’ll be very hard times for at least an half women because men will still have about 40% and men willingly to share their resources with a woman will be unicorns.

As long as men in China, Russia and USA control the markets and women desire financial security, multi million dollar homes, cars, champagne and handbags it’s NEVER gonna happen.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Wymyn paying for services with sex?

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[AttonParticipant]

Raging Vaginal Disease many will have it none of them will get rid of it.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Remember lads, women ARE 80% of the market spending, BUT it is generally done on mens’ money and mens’ economic, marketing and ideas.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

How bad is the economy there? Im wondering. Are they that desperate or just basically fine with being whores?

I don’t really care. It IS barter, afterall. Good for the working man.

All Aussie women care about is $$$, status and having a man that looks like Hugh Jackman. ‘nuf said.

[AttonParticipant]

bigboy83 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Faust For Science wrote:

I find this sad.

It’s female nature unleashed.
In the wild women who traded sex for resources have more chance to survive, on average.
The old concept of marriage was just a compromise between the need for sex of men and the need of support of women. As long as women had been taught to keep are of their husband, the system, even if with a lot of flaws (even many issues affecting women, I’m very fair about it), had worked. Now, since women are generally taught that happiness of their husbands is not so important, the very idea of marriage is in deep crisis.
My idea is that 20 years from now, 2035, due actual educational gender gap, women will control about 60% of the economy, but it’ll be very hard times for at least an half women because men will still have about 40% and men willingly to share their resources with a woman will be unicorns.
In other words women with money will never bother to marry, because they will not need resources, but all other women, at least an half, will be totally desperate, and such things like trading services for sex will be extremely common.

More chance of survival? Not really.
C~~~s who want to live the slut lifestyle are more likely to die from cervical cancer without the proper healthcare, most of these have a good chance of being dead in their early 50’s. I personal know a couple who have this, ones in her mid 30’s, the other in her mid 20’s, and their not healthy people, in fact they have health problems all the time.

Just ask a gynecologist but that is assuming gynecology is even possible, with some of these women.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

DeepInThought wrote:

Remember lads, women ARE 80% of the market spending, BUT it is generally done on mens’ money and mens’ economic, marketing and ideas.

To be precise, women are 80% of the net profit for sellers, quite different from being 80% of the market spending. The difference is due the fact that men tend to spend their money on things where price are less charged by immaterial, emotional, factors. What’s the profit margin on a car, a boat, a computer, a rifle, or a LED TV? 10%-20% these are the typical voluptuary expenses for men.
What’s the profit margin for an expensive perfum, hand-made handbag, high fashion dress? 80%-90% – and these are the typical voluptuary expenses for women.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[DeepInThoughtParticipant 2710]

Eric Lauder wrote:

DeepInThought wrote:

Remember lads, women ARE 80% of the market spending, BUT it is generally done on mens’ money and mens’ economic, marketing and ideas.

To be precise, women are 80% of the net profit for sellers, quite different from being 80% of the market spending. The difference is due the fact that men tend to spend their money on things where price are less charged by immaterial, emotional, factors. What’s the profit margin on a car, a boat, a computer, a rifle, or a LED TV? 10%-20% these are the typical voluptuary expenses for men.
What’s the profit margin for an expensive perfum, hand-made handbag, high fashion dress? 80%-90% – and these are the typical voluptuary expenses for women.

Thanks for correcting me *thumbs up*

[EntropyParticipant 902]

… and the wage gap argument is OFFICIALLY invalid.

"Compare your lives to mine and then kill yourselves" -BBR

[BubParticipant 1405]

How do I show pu$$y on my tax return ? Lol………..

Just rolling down the road

[Author]

Posts