Women not consenting to sex robots, who should be punished?

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

so………………………………….

The programmer is responsible for the robot……………….somehow…………raping………..her…………….

See? When they start shooting bitches in the street, I’m not going to be able to shed a tear. No matter what, they’ll find a way to bitch. They’ll keep it up no matter how hard you try to appease them until finally, you snap and will kill them for silence even if it’s a jail cell. Go MGTOW and don’t go back.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[SH3LLZParticipant 5569]

F~~~ THESE WOMEN! Literally and figuratively! They rather f~~~ a fish monster. They thing bestiality is romantic now. Feminism has corrupted their minds beyond redemption. Im no monk, but when I do smash, im wrapping up atomic bunker style! These hoes are GROSS

And I’ll NEVER let another vagina attach itself to my wallet!

#ICETHEMOUT
#MANOUT!

#ICETHEMOUT!!! #MANOUT!!! #HIDEYOURWEALTH #VAGINAISWORTHLESS

[AttonParticipant]

They can just try it, since my response would be a large number of battle droids with m4’s.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[GrumpyParticipant]

Caveat Emptor ladies and gents, caveat emptor.
When you purchase a machine for sex, and use it. You have provided consent.
Read the f~~~ing EULA, the owner/operator manual, and know and understand the options.
If I stick my dick in an electric toaster and electrocute myself who is to blame?
The manufacturer, the electric company, or me for being a retard and using the device incorrectly?

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Simple solution to this.

Do not design male robots for females. When you can eliminate a problem, then do it. As long as you interact with said females, you will encounter drama. Zero interaction with drama.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

Grumpy wrote:

The manufacturer, the electric company, or me for being a retard and using the device incorrectly?

The person to blame is not you nor the power company, it is the poor bastard who is digging up the coal in the coal mine. SMH…..

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22545]

Eric Lauder wrote:

One scenario being pondered is if a robot has sex with a woman who hasn’t consented. Does that count as rape? And who should be punished?

THAT’S OBIOUVS: WHEN A WOMAN CRY, THEN THE CLOSER MAN IS BEING PUNISHED – INDEED

“Thus if a male gendered sex robot were to rape a woman…the police would need to hunt down the programmer.”

Here we go

If male sex robots rape women it could land their programmers in jail, warns expert

<iframe class=”wp-embedded-content” sandbox=”allow-scripts” security=”restricted” src=”https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6066373/male-sex-robot-rape-legal-liability/embed/#?secret=7eXpx6ARUK” data-secret=”7eXpx6ARUK” width=”500″ height=”287″ title=”“If male sex robots rape women it could land their programmers in jail, warns expert” — The Sun” frameborder=”0″ marginwidth=”0″ marginheight=”0″ scrolling=”no”></iframe>

MY CONCLUSION: GIVE THEM NOTHING.

Its a tool. It doesnt have to ask consent. Besided women already have set precedent tools do not need to as consent. Vibrators, dildoes, butt plugs, blow up male sex dolls, sex dolls,bananas, cucumbers, baseball bats, bedposts, car gear shifters, jacuzzis, etc, have never been required to give consent, and in fact, were also never asked by women for their consent, either.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

I bet that a way greater percentage of women “marry” their sex robots. Women are addicted to marriage and will do anything for the title.

A way greater percentage of women be marrying f~~~ing trees. And their pets. And ghosts. And themselves.

And that’s OK, because I’m not a robot or a tree or a pet or a ghost or whatever.

They do anything to fake their “special day”. And if you think single men are under shame and peer pressure, it’s nothing to the s~~~ women give each other later in life for not having a man especially by women who think they have one.

A woman looks at that picture and thinks: “How romantic,” or, “How weird is she?”

A man looks at that picture and thinks: “Those robot parts look 3D printed. I wonder what 3D printer they used.”

[Gabriel A. KingParticipant 730]

Good. I’d rather have then marrying trees than bugging the s~~~ out of me all day.

[foghornleghornParticipant 3449]

does the dildo ask consent?

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

foghornleghorn wrote:

does the dildo ask consent?

Oh f~~~.

Ima put a sound chip in a dildo that does exactly that. Should sell well on the novelty market for a production run or two.

But seriously, though, the whole idea of “sex robot rape” is a complete red herring. Has anyone else here ever actually read the EULA that comes with every major software product? Microsoft Windows can literally f~~~ you up the ass with a chainsaw, and there’s nothing you can do about it since you clicked the “I Accept” button. Does anyone seriously think sexbots won’t come with an equally overblown EULA for covering the manufacturer’s ass?

[Gravel PitParticipant]

If a woman is alone in the forest and falls on a dick, did a rape happen?

Sorry, the whole topic is kind of insane. There is a continuous anthropomorphication of robots in the last 20 years that is ludicrous.

But this topic is just like a liberal suing the gun manufacturer….

And I wouldn’t bother worrying about these hypothetical ideas about robots and AI until I actually see some robots with AI. May as well be talking about flying carpets.

The legal system is in place so when people sue, you can dismiss their case or counter sue.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant 6253]

This illogical crap, if not identified with a MGTOW mindset, will result in an epidemic worse than the ebola virus. You cannot reason with a virus. You can understand it and stay away from it.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Gravel Pit wrote:

Sorry, the whole topic is kind of insane.

Find me a topic involving women (especially feminists) that isn’t.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

MGTOW_Mike wrote:

Simple solution to this.

Do not design male robots for females. When you can eliminate a problem, then do it. As long as you interact with said females, you will encounter drama. Zero interaction with drama.

That would be wrong: without male sex robots the company would be accused to be sexist.
I would design and market a male sex robot that is good looking but totally unable to move: female sex robots with motion motors, male sex robots without motion motors “cuz our female customers doesn’t want moving male robots – women are strong and independent and they want to have full initiative in the bedroom”
I want really see how the c~~~s could convince the court that they have been raped by a sex robot totally unable to move…
Win win.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

sidecar wrote:

GravelPit wrote:

Sorry, the whole topic is kind of insane.

Find me a topic involving women (especially feminists) that isn’t.

Conservative men sometimes aren’t better: I have my kids so I have nothing to do. So I spent quite a lot of time trying convincing conservative men to not virtually chop their dick by criminalizing surrogacy.
Those morons still think that withholding a chance to have kids without women is a good idea, it’s virtue signalling or something like that.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts