Women lament the missing men in society

[X11Spectator 4520]

Universities have to keep inventing new trendy degree courses with ever lower standards to get fees to pay for research going on in dangerous musty labs conducted by mainly men in straight hard STEM fields where the women just ain’t at.

[ConstantineParticipant 4417]

Autolite wrote:

Some women were paying a high price for feminism, she suggested.

And please note how she still bemoans the problem that women are getting from it.

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Article says:
Not enough “good enough” men for the hypergamous princesses!

Anonymous wrote:

F~~~ em, they want a college educated man to show the hive what they caught in the vagina net. Never mind resource extraction during and after the marriage and kids scam. A lot of blue collar workers like myself make more money than people with degrees. I’m not bashing college but their idea of education vs reality are to different things. A man will get educated for promotion and money, yes there’s status to. A female wants the money and status but not the work to get there and maintain it. Most not all I will say, that would be unfair. They snag you with the pussy show you off until they find better and before they hit the wall you as a man are run through the cleaners. They can freeze their eggs until the Lord returns. We are out!

No, it’s about money, not about education.
I have a PhD in History but my job is unrelated with that.
The wage is good, much better than average but still slightly less than an associated university professor, I have further little income due I own another house and it’s rented but also I have to support two children, so net income is about 80% that of an associated university professor.
A female associated university professor is almost always attracted by me and ready to f~~~ with me but she’s unlikely to start a serious relationship with me even if:
I have more culture than at least an half university professors.
I have an awesome body compared to almost all male university professors.
I still have a net income that is at least 80% that of an associated university professor.

When they say “equal” they mean “earning at least 120% them, ideally 150% or more”.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Eric Lauder wrote:

No, it’s about money, not about education.
I have a PhD in History but my job is unrelated with that.
The wage is good, much better than average but still slightly less than an associated university professor, I have further little income due I own another house and it’s rented but also I have to support two children, so net income is about 80% that of an associated university professor.
A female associated university professor is almost always attracted by me and ready to f~~~ with me but she’s unlikely to start a serious relationship with me even if:
I have more culture than at least an half university professors.
I have an awesome body compared to almost all male university professors.
I still have a net income that is at least 80% that of an associated university professor.

When they say “equal” they mean “earning at least 120% them, ideally 150% or more”.

Exactly. What some don’t understand is that hypergamy is an unchecked instinct. The more a woman earns the more she wants her long term partner to earn.

Even if a woman is millionaire she will want a multi-millionaire of billionaire.

Women’s wants are not reasonable, they are an endless pit.

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

That’s the funniest and most satisfying news article I’ve read in months, thanks for sharing OP

Feminists must reap what they sow. We are approaching peak gynocentrism, expect a watershed point in maybe the next decade, or sooner. Then it’s no longer a cold war.

[Anonymous 3]

They were unable to find willing men, because no highly educated, successful, intelligent man actually believes women are equal to them and that somehow a past her prime promiscuous bitch is something he has to be around.

Women have this cognitive dissonance about them that they are smarter than men but superior men will be easily manipulated and fooled, due to their hypergamous desires. You can fool stupid men. Plenty of blue pill idiots that buy into all this feminism bulls~~~ and are easily manipulated.

But anyone with a brain knows better. And women spent decades silencing warnings from smarter men and even in some cases older women that had meant well, until they had only an echo chamber of feminism where women were praised as perfect goddesses while being obviously inept and total bitches.

That type of thing can only work short term, especially from around 15-25, but then it fades after that and the bulls~~~ by 35 nobody, even blue pill men, wants anything to do with these women. You better believe they’d be up for a blue pill man at that age too, if only he also wasn’t busy chasing after the 15-25 group, even if he is unsuccessful. But 15-25 year old women are mostly trash themselves. and usually even a blue pill loser “gets” a 25-30 year old out of persistence.

But who cares. I’m with Doc on this, it’s not even really worth discussing. Once a man has reached the MGTOW stage, he’s not going back no matter what. I don’t think even a young, well behaved virgin would work, let alone a 35+ year old hag.

[narwhalParticipant]

It looks like the ‘chicken or egg’ dilemma. Which came first, did the men start losing interest in us, or did we lost interest in them? Women always take the side of the argument where it’s somebody else’s fault. Men take the side where they can fix the issue, or bypass it, and go about living a happy life.

These women spent years ignoring all the signs around them, and then act surprised when they realized that raising your standards, while doing nothing to appeal to the opposite sex will eventually push you out of the market.

Most men did the opposite, they tried to raise their value while lowering standards to accommodate till the point they realized they were better off getting out of the market.

Ok. Then do it.

[ShineParticipant 1696]

Anonymous wrote:

A typical C~~~ response,

“Maria Elena 5 Jul 2017 7:56AM
HA! I rather be an old cat lady and lonely spinter crying in a Ferrari than a desperate wife and mother of 4 in a pick up truck with a husband trying to make ends meet. (if the dude still around that is. Men tend to abandon their families quite frequent) The ova is frozen and there’s plenty of spern banks to choose from. BYEEEE”

This is a similar quote to “I would rather cry in a BMW than smile on a bicycle.” from a Chinese TV dating show ‘If you are the one’.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I_would_rather_cry_in_a_BMW

The line was in response to a question by an unemployed suitor who asked if Ma would “ride a bicycle with him” on a date.

Both examples showing hypergamous nature.

"Society is to blame" Denton

[Anonymous 0]

Keymaster wrote:

GENUISES actually! I went to Starbucks yesterday and I actually saw woman splitting the atom while she sipped on her flavor-changing unicorn frappuccino. So over-educated.

Amazing! I saw a woman designing a self-driving car while checking her facebook for any new beta orbiters.

[Anonymous 0]

Beer wrote:

They think their “career” makes them attractive then chase after higher income guys, who once you get in your 30s are more likely more concerned about protecting their income and wealth than if their next hole makes 40k a year or 100k a year.

^^^This plus a 30 year old high income guy will probably rather have a 22 year old than some post wall career woman.

[AufladenParticipant 105]

I saw this ‘news’ a few hours ago, the title of which had me laughing:

Women graduates ‘desperately’ freeze eggs over ‘lack of men’

I immediately thought of this site. I continued to read and saw the claim that there is a ‘dearth of educated men to marry’. You think? Because we are now getting a new form of education elsewhere. Men educating other men of the gigantic black hole that is ‘committing to family life’, as the article I read so wonderfully put it. Our fault y’see? Ain’t it always us to blame.

All the missing men will hopefully remain missing….living their own lives, under their own rules, and not falling for all this claptrap that a woman spending more time on her job and being forced to freeze her sodding eggs because of it is down to men. Men who refuse to be signed up to contracts that serve no conceivable purpose to them.

I would commit to such a life for a woman who I believed genuinely loved me, wanted to build an equal life, and……hang on. Considering they aren’t capable of the first thing, nothing else matters.

I had egg mayonnaise sandwiches for lunch today. The only eggs I want anywhere near me.

'You can achieve more and be happy avoiding the wrong women than you ever could searching for the right woman.' - KM

[Anonymous 2]

Oh, for f~~~’s sake! Just come out and say it, already! This is just a bunch of beating around the bush to try and portray women in a positive light instead of saying what the real problem is: HYPERGAMY!

“Eligible” is code for “making more money (preferably, significantly more) than her”. Of course, they can’t just come out and say it because it makes women look greedy and superficial, and heaven forbid women EVER be painted in a negative light in western society! Men, of course, can be bashed mercilessly.

This article just supports the fact that women don’t give a s~~~ about how good of a person a man is. If his salary isn’t right, then he’s in the “no go” zone. Before they even start dating somebody, women are thinking about how much they can squeeze out of their future ex-hubby in divorce court. Divorce court is every woman’s dream and every man’s nightmare.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Oh, for f~~~’s sake! Just come out and say it, already! This is just a bunch of beating around the bush to try and portray women in a positive light instead of saying what the real problem is: HYPERGAMY!

“Eligible” is code for “making more money (preferably, significantly more) than her”. Of course, they can’t just come out and say it because it makes women look greedy and superficial, and heaven forbid women EVER be painted in a negative light in western society! Men, of course, can be bashed mercilessly.

This article just supports the fact that women don’t give a s~~~ about how good of a person a man is. If his salary isn’t right, then he’s in the “no go” zone. Before they even start dating somebody, women are thinking about how much they can squeeze out of their future ex-hubby in divorce court. Divorce court is every woman’s dream and every man’s nightmare.

lol you really think women have a choice in the matter?

The narrative that women choose their partners only work on young men and low tier men. Any men above that have always had the choice. There is a reason a dowry was standard for most cultures at most times. High tier men have to be bribed to take on women, otherwise they won’t do it.

Western society got things backwards, and also p~~~ed away women’s most valuable traits: youth, virginity, softness, obedience, loyalty. The first two are physical realities, the others may have always been a myth, and women merely exposed their true natures. But the former two women refused to give to men in marriage, so it is moot.

There is a reason young women were married in the past and were kept married. It wasn’t to “oppress” them. It was at women’s insistence, not men’s. It is because they essentially trade 10-20 years max for 40-60+ years. It was extremely beneficial to them. The only gender oppressed in that arrangement were men, who were forced into it.

Feminism ultimately freed men. Feminism is the farmer that killed the golden goose out of greed. There is no going back. Idiots.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

I’m too uneducated to understand. Maybe one of these ladies could read it to me and explain the finer points. I hope I get some fresh baked cookies out of the deal to cover up the smell of her dying aspirations of motherhood.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Anonymous wrote:

A typical C~~~ response,

“Maria Elena 5 Jul 2017 7:56AM
HA! I rather be an old cat lady and lonely spinter crying in a Ferrari than a desperate wife and mother of 4 in a pick up truck with a husband trying to make ends meet. (if the dude still around that is. Men tend to abandon their families quite frequent) The ova is frozen and there’s plenty of spern banks to choose from. BYEEEE”

I’ve heard c~~~s like this so much in my teens and early 20s. Their message changes when they get into their late 20s and beyond. Once she hits the wall and being that old cat lady lonely spinster becomes a reality she’ll be hating her life. Meanwhile guys will be looking at her saying thank god I didn’t commit to that when she was young and hot because look at her now.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Anonymous wrote:

lol you really think women have a choice in the matter?

The narrative that women choose their partners only work on young men and low tier men. Any men above that have always had the choice. There is a reason a dowry was standard for most cultures at most times. High tier men have to be bribed to take on women, otherwise they won’t do it.

Western society got things backwards, and also p~~~ed away women’s most valuable traits: youth, virginity, softness, obedience, loyalty. The first two are physical realities, the others may have always been a myth, and women merely exposed their true natures. But the former two women refused to give to men in marriage, so it is moot.

There is a reason young women were married in the past and were kept married. It wasn’t to “oppress” them. It was at women’s insistence, not men’s. It is because they essentially trade 10-20 years max for 40-60+ years. It was extremely beneficial to them. The only gender oppressed in that arrangement were men, who were forced into it.

Feminism ultimately freed men. Feminism is the farmer that killed the golden goose out of greed. There is no going back. Idiots.

Beautiful post Phoenix, you’ve been hitting it out of the park lately.

I’m a young man, that has experienced what you’ve described recently. I come from a traditional family with a mother that loves to gossip; when news got out that I was making a name for myself in the markets the parties and gatherings dynamics changed completely.

The muslim holiday Eid happened recently, im not religious anymore but its an enjoyable holiday so I spend it with my family and friends. At every party/gathering women that never spoke to me in previous years were being friendly and giving me compliments for the most stupid s~~~. A few of them were being a bit more friendly than what is acceptable for a muslim women (i’ve had experience with muslim women before; most of them use piety as a way to attract a man, they dont actually care about God).

All i was thinking was that I wanted nothing to do with these women; their opportunistic nature was showing in full force. I was asked ‘when are you going to get married’ by a woman and i told her that i don’t want to get tied down, i enjoy having my freedom. One of the old men in the room gave a little smile and chuckle when I said that.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Aufladen wrote:

All the missing men will hopefully remain missing….living their own lives, under their own rules, and not falling for all this claptrap that a woman spending more time on her job and being forced to freeze her sodding eggs because of it is down to men.

For all this nonsense about women not starting families because they focus on their careers…why do I know so few women in the 25-35 age bracket who make 75k+ per year and have assets to show for it?

I’m in that age bracket myself so I know quite a few women in it. Most of them work s~~~ jobs and are broke. I know two that have over 100k net worth…both have a divorce under their belt. One I think would have gotten there on her own as I know she makes over 100k a year and isn’t too retarded with her money, she’s smart enough to max her 401k and can hold an intelligent conversation about stocks, but the other I don’t think makes a lot, she just divorced an investment banker and bought breast implants, a condo, and a couple high end cars with her divorce cash and prizes.

[rorickParticipant 682]

Whatever said, and whatever done.. its always the nature that wins in the end i.e. Men !! So c~~~s, you can continue freezing your eggs for eons or how about using an incubator.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Fuck this planet.

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Keymaster wrote:

“‘As far as I’m concerned, a dinner party isn’t complete without a bit of an intellectual tussle during dessert’”

Which is of course code for “unless I start an argument I’m not satisfied”.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Author]

Posts