Women hijacking the MRM?

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

I used to go to this MRA forums before I came here it was a long time ago and frankly I didn’t last too long. You will see my nickname on there. What is funny is a woman makes a thread about women highjacking the MRM. What is funny is that she or other women are doing the exact thing they are being accused of. When I started to explain why they men are being so aggressive and not trusting to her it’s the MRA mangina comes along to her rescue.
If you wonder why women don’t belong to a men’s community this is enough proof. It has happen to on AFVM and now even with a small MRA forums that doesn’t that get much traffic, it happening there too.

The admin wonder why men won’t step up to the plate to help out the site. Geesh if they were actually listen to men and being supportive of men instead of putting words in their mouths maybe they would have. Here is the link to the thread. What I have posted wasn’t really my view but the view of men being hostile and not so trusting with women.

http://antimisandry.com/general-news/57115.htm

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

You cannot hurt women and girls without also hurting men and boys. You cannot hurt men and boys without also hurting women and girls. We all belong to the same species. More to the point, if you chased female members away from the MRM, you would fatally damage the MRM cause.

Never mind they drive men like me away from the cause and obviously men other men. this is why MGTOW is the only way to go.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

They are trying to manipulate and control the movement. Keep men on the plantaDrtion.

Remember how feminist say men can’t be feminists. Well do you really think any females care about men?

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Read the post made the response to my posts. These idiots put words in my mouth. Talking about manginas, these guys are no different than male feminists, they are just the other side of the coin.

Start reading from post #61.

http://antimisandry.com/general-news/57115-2.htm

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Notice her argument is about “anti feminism” or being “against feminism”. But there is a distinct difference between being “against feminism” — and being PRO-MALE.

Women are simply not “pro-male” and they don’t care for things that are pro-male. In fact, when women encounter things / groups / thoughts / opinions that are pro-male, they too often reinterpret them as “anti-female”.

But a pro-male agenda is not inherently anti-female.

Take for example a wedding. If a groom doesn’t show up to the wedding, that’s a pro-male act. He’s thinking about his concerns, protecting his future, assets and well-being. But how does the bride and the bridesmaids interpret that? It’s “anti-female” and she will beat him over the head with a bouquet. If a bride were actually PRO-MALE, she wouldn’t want him to do something he didn’t want to do anyway.

So when a woman steps in and pretends to be there for “the male best interest”, listen to how she speaks. “Hey everyone! I’m anti-feminist too! Why don’t you let me in?”.

This isn’t about being “anti-feminist”. She’s got it all wrong. Its’ about being PRO-MALE. You don’t need to be “against feminism” anyway… all that’s required for it to FAIL, is a simple refusal to subscribe to it.

SHE KNOWS THIS.

Feminists are telling these women to pretend to like sports, work, being independent and that women can’t be happy unless they enjoy the same things MEN do. And when an “anti-feminist” woman says “f~~~ you, I want to be a mother and a wife”… the feminists lose their budget – and their minds.

SHE needs to be “anti-feminist”.
MEN only need to be “pro-male”.

A goodly number of f~~~ing “men’s issues” can be solved by refusing to sign a marriage contract in the first place. + No kids. + No cohabitation. You don’t even need to band together with women to accomplish that.

Women “hijack” the MRM for the wrong reason.
They PRETEND to be an ally, but they aren’t.

We don’t give a s~~~ about being “anti-feminism” – or “fighting feminism”. We’re PRO-MALE and don’t need a woman’s help for that. She can duke it out with the feminists, and already has enough to worry about.

The enemy of your enemy …. is not necessarily your friend.

Not even a man’s WIFE (or bride) is “pro-male”. And she’s the one who swore to “love” you. So these women who pretend to be “on your side” are entirely full of s~~~.

—

Note the hashtag #womenagainstfeminism. That’s a completely different message than #womenformen. But these “women against feminism” are really only against feminism. They are not pro-male and never will be. That’s why they get tossed out.

Feminism created #heforshe, though.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

Hey CC, why did you bother? Here we get to chew women to shreds and throw them the hell out!

Your arguing with feminized MRA reminds me of this:

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

Typical c~~~ behavior. They have to be in the f~~~ing spotlight. LOOK AT US WOMEN how we are supporting men… with emphasis on Look at us! That’s why they are there and everywhere. Men create and women come to rip the benefits and then f~~~ it up.
I’m thanking KeyMaster every day for making this website “registered red-pill Men only” and my c~~~-punting brothers for keeping it clean.

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[Anonymous 42]

[DengeParticipant 28]

Just yesterday I was on this site, reading and stumbled across an article there about this very topic.

link

He analyses different types of interfering women and details how they are being disruptive. Both informative and entertaining, I recommend it.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Anonymous wrote:

Hey CC, why did you bother? Here we get to chew women to shreds and throw them the hell out!

Your arguing with feminized MRA reminds me of this:

<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/9QG1UJMLoIk?feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ height=”281″ width=”500″></iframe>

<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/tKePT2I-ORU?start=58&feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ height=”281″ width=”500″></iframe>

<iframe src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/VhSXohRnEuk?start=19&feature=oembed” allowfullscreen=”” frameborder=”0″ height=”281″ width=”500″></iframe>

Because I wanted to see what was going on there. The first response is why I blame the woman.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[KeymasterKeymaster]

John Woods 13 wrote:

Typical c~~~ behavior. They have to be in the f~~~ing spotlight. LOOK AT US WOMEN how we are supporting men… with emphasis on Look at us!

There’s a good example. ^

“Supporting men” is how they THINK they are coming across. But being “anti-feminism” is something else. It’s not supporting men. It’s just being “anti-feminist”.

In terms of integers, and all things being equal at ZERO….
They are pretending a -1 for feminism is the same as a +1 for men.

It ain’t.

John Woods 13 wrote:

this website “registered red-pill Men only”

Another good observation. The sign on the door says “FOR MEN”. It doesn’t say “women f~~~ off and get out” because we should never have to. They should already know the difference.

Again…. a totally different message, and we did it that way ON PURPOSE.

But when necessary – and it has been at times(!) – we will say “women can f~~~ off”.
Whatever it takes to keep it FOR MEN ONLY and “pro-male”.

For nearly 2 years we kept it WIDE OPEN for anyone to register, join and post. We had no intention of creating a men’s “prison with barbed wire” to keep women out. We created a wide-open atmosphere to welcome men IN. But women f~~~ed that up – MANY MANY times – because they interpreted “pro-male” to mean “anti-female”.

So the “barbed wire” installed later was only necessary to keep it PRO-MALE.
The can attempt to hijack the MRM, but they will never hijack MGTOW.

MGTOW would never permit it under any circumstances.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

The only reason women would go against feminism and declare themselves to be anti feminists is they want to be the fictional nawalt. Women against feminism are seen are traditional unicorns compared to the feminist c~~~s even thou they are still the same thing the only difference is they want men to support them.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

The MRM is long gone.
The only thing left is a bunch of manginas and women wearing the label and apologizing to women all the time.

[Anonymous 54]

I am on this site because it is for Men only.I want to talk with other Men without womens throwing in there two cents.I give credit to MRAs for there effort,how they deal with them bithes i dont know,but i want no part of it. Im here for the Brotherhood.

[Ronin De NiroParticipant 200]

Not surprised. Don’t follow closely, but heard similar things is happening to atheist movements. Happened in many circles I was in.

I hate to say such things, because it would sound over the top if it wasn’t true. But that is all the do. They infiltrate, divide, create chaos, and destroy it from inside out.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

The real problem is the Pua, white knight pussy worshippers, who don’t have the b~~~~ to kick them out. If these betas actually had b~~~~, we wouldn’t be talking about this.

The c~~~s main objective is to get into mgtow, the holy grail.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

It happened in geek culture a few years back.

Low status women can go into these groups and instantly gain a group of beta orbiters who will bend over backwards for her. These days comic cons have posters telling non-Chads Geeks not to touch women when they’re out in their Slutty Cosplay outfits.

I suspect they are infiltrating MRA’s partly because of this, but also because they genuinely dislike bats~~~ crazy feminists speaking for all women. However, i think that they and MRAs will have very different goals in the long-term and the men may be setting themselves up to be pawns.

I don’t think this goes for all female MRAs, but there shouldn’t be an instant trust of someones motives just because they’re anti-feminist.

[Anonymous 1]

To sum up – MRA’s are nawalt. That will serve to their detriment.

Best of luck boys. I actually mean that.

[BufordParticipant 935]

Surprising?

Man builds a thing.
Man stands back to admire what he’s built.
Woman previously hiding out of sight darts past man and takes it over.
Woman slowly destroys what man had built.

"This happens every time one of these floozies starts poontangin' around with those show folk fags. - Sheriff Buford T. Justice"

[Ronin De NiroParticipant 200]

Expect this to happen in MGTOW, by the way. It is inevitable. Soon it the term will be perverted and the woman swarms will join in.

[Author]

Posts